Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu May 07, 2026 12:52 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 8:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Taxi drivers and operators in Middlesbrough will be reimbursed after four years of "overcharging"

NEARLY £700,000 looks set to be paid back by Middlesbrough Council to Teesside taxi owners and operators after several years of overcharging for licences.

The potential refunds on the cost of the licences follows a decision by the Local Government Ombudsman and covers the four years from 2012/13 to 2015/16.

The plan, which will be considered at a council meeting on Wednesday, March 30, follows a review of the administration of taxi licensing in the town.

The council apologised to Teesside's largest taxi company, Boro Taxis, after it was reprimanded by the ombudsman. Christine Bell, the taxi firm's company secretary had made a complaint about the way fees were calculated.

Just over half of the reimbursement will be covered by council reserves, while the rest will be paid out from a surplus within the existing taxi licensing budget.

At the root of the over-charging was the Council’s ‘cross-subsidy’ approach to drivers’ fees, in which increases in fees to vehicle proprietors and private hire operators were used to off-set the fees payable by drivers.

But earlier this year, after the ombudsman decision, the council changed its fee structure and work was undertaken to establish how much money needed to be paid back to operators.

Councillor Julia Rostron, Middlesbrough Council’s Executive Member for Adult Health and Social Care, said: “Our approach to taxi licensing for many years has been similar those of authorities up and down the country.

“Our aim has always been to be fair and even-handed, while offering an effective and responsive service.

“We have always endeavoured to support drivers as many are of limited means, but now accept that this approach could not be legally justified.

“However we will not seek to claw back any of the driver under-payments, particularly as the recent review has resulted in a significant increase in their licence fees.”

source: http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/1 ... ing_quot_/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 8:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Our lot have just admitted doing this.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 11:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Ours said they're running at a deficit and that the wages for lincencing staff is some of the lowest in the country

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2016 11:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Here are our figures for vehicle licenses.
We currently pay £252.50 for a 1 year license. it went up in February from £202.
The Council say there is a deficit on vehicle licenses of £4244
The new fees proposed from April 1st are £156 which includes recovering this deficit.
Without the deficit the cost would be £102 for the year.
Can anyone explain how there is a deficit when we are paying more than double the actual cost?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2016 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
Our lot have just admitted doing this.

Good.

Have their knackers.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2016 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
Can anyone explain how there is a deficit when we are paying more than double the actual cost?

Civil Servants desperate to keep their jobs.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 822 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group