Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 7:58 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
When are we going to get rid of these vermin?

https://www.facebook.com/jessica.amy.g/ ... 893217728/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Once again the TAXI(hackney carriage) has been the receiver of much bad publicity on a public website when the perpetrator is clearly a private hire driver and vehicle,when will people realise that there is a huge difference between the TAXI(the name states it) and the private hire trade,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
heathcote wrote:
Once again the TAXI(hackney carriage) has been the receiver of much bad publicity on a public website when the perpetrator is clearly a private hire driver and vehicle,when will people realise that there is a huge difference between the TAXI(the name states it) and the private hire trade,


Looks like they've got rid of him, they didn't mess about.

Thank you Nigel for your email, we deeply ashamed of the conduct of this Leicester City Council licensed driver, and he clearly broke the law, and has been dispensed with, as well as being reported to the council. The driver is now free to work for any firm he chooses. Our policy is clear, we do not discriminate. If we have drivers reported to us for breaking terms of their license, we cut them off from our bookings system and no longer use their service. The manager I believe is contacting the customer concerned, and will offer him a full apology and some free journeys.




Kind Regards







David Hunter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
Sounds like it's turned into a racial debate.

Thank you Nigel, its been a traumatic 24 hours for us all hear, as it turned into a racial debate with a lot of our staff that dont belong to an ethnic group, being abused.







Kind Regards







David Hunter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
heathcote wrote:
Once again the TAXI(hackney carriage) has been the receiver of much bad publicity on a public website when the perpetrator is clearly a private hire driver and vehicle,when will people realise that there is a huge difference between the TAXI(the name states it) and the private hire trade,


When the trade starts a super complaint to the press complaints people and it is made clear there is an issue

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 8:55 pm
Posts: 479
Simple solution to this issue and child sexual abuse don't issue Hackney or Ph badges to Muslims.
I'm sure the licensing authorities know this would work but there's not a hope in hell any would have the balls to do it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:45 am
Posts: 9966
Location: Braintree, Essex.
Midlife martyr wrote:
Simple solution to this issue and child sexual abuse don't issue Hackney or Ph badges to Muslims.
I'm sure the licensing authorities know this would work but there's not a hope in hell any would have the balls to do it.


Once one would start the others will follow. It would be a minefield but tread carefully and the objective can be achieved.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Nidge2 wrote:
heathcote wrote:
Once again the TAXI(hackney carriage) has been the receiver of much bad publicity on a public website when the perpetrator is clearly a private hire driver and vehicle,when will people realise that there is a huge difference between the TAXI(the name states it) and the private hire trade,


Looks like they've got rid of him, they didn't mess about.

Thank you Nigel for your email, we deeply ashamed of the conduct of this Leicester City Council licensed driver, and he clearly broke the law, and has been dispensed with, as well as being reported to the council.
Quote:
The driver is now free to work for any firm he chooses
. Our policy is clear, we do not discriminate. If we have drivers reported to us for breaking terms of their license, we cut them off from our bookings system and no longer use their service. The manager I believe is contacting the customer concerned, and will offer him a full apology and some free journeys.

He wont be once the council take him to court and he looses his licence




Kind Regards







David Hunter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
heathcote wrote:
when will people realise that there is a huge difference between the TAXI(the name states it) and the private hire trade,

Remind me what that difference is in respect of driver credentials in your area? As it's nothing to do with the vehicle.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Midlife martyr wrote:
Simple solution to this issue and child sexual abuse don't issue Hackney or Ph badges to Muslims.

Not sure that's a sensible view. [-X

More enforcement everywhere yes, banning the bad guys yes, but banning some fella cos of his religion is ridiculous.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 9:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 8:55 pm
Posts: 479
Sussex wrote:
Midlife martyr wrote:
Simple solution to this issue and child sexual abuse don't issue Hackney or Ph badges to Muslims.

Not sure that's a sensible view. [-X

More enforcement everywhere yes, banning the bad guys yes, but banning some fella cos of his religion is ridiculous.


So it's just a coincidence that most of the drivers that refuse to take guide/assistance dogs and the drivers involved in the organised child sex abuse rings happen to come from a certain religious background.

The problem with followers of Islam is they believe there religious laws are superior to the laws of the land they are in unless that changes this is certain to result in more offences of this nature.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
TO INFER THAT MUSLIMS ARE ALL SEX PREDATORS OR INCAPABLE OR REFUSING TO FOLLOW LICENSING REQUIREMENTS IS LUDICROUS,THERE ARE THOUSANDS WHO DO ON A DAILY BASIS

TO POINT OUT THE FACTUAL HISTORY OF SUCH FREQUENT EVENTS AND REQUEST MUSLIM AUTHORITY'S INVESTIGATE AND PRONOUNCE ON SUCH OCCURRENCES IS FAIR AND PROPER .............................SO LETS HEAR FROM THEIR REPS PLEASE!

HAS THIS DRIVER BEEN DEALT WITH BY THE COUNCIL YET SURELY HE MUST BE BANNED FOR LIFE FROM THE INDUSTRY??

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
It seems to me that whilst the company say they have now got rid of the driver why did they not insist the driver taking the customer in the first place instead of offering to send another car?

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:20 am
Posts: 2948
Location: Over here!
A simple way around this persistent problem is to have a notice posted alongside/within the vehicle license, stating.......This "VEHICLE" and "DRIVER" are licensed to carry "GUIDE DOGS". What could be simpler? nobody could possibly claim anything different.

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:20 am
Posts: 2948
Location: Over here!
To get rid of this persistent problem! Why not incorporate within the vehicle/driver license, an automatic inclusion that the vehicle and driver are licensed to carry (a) "Guide Dog". It leaves no doubt to any driver of his/her legal obligations, or to any customer, who might think that as many as they like is the order of the day.

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 826 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group