Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed May 06, 2026 6:59 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Swansea private hire operator fined a second time for employing unlicensed drivers


A PRIVATE hire operator has been prosecuted for a second occasion for licensing offences, including employing unlicensed drivers.

Matthew Benjamin, operator of MCB Executive Travel in Swansea, pleaded guilty at Brecon Magistrates Court to five charges, after being found on four occasions to be employing unlicensed drivers to undertake hirings, as well as failing to produce his private hire operator records as required.

It follows a prosecution for similar offences earlier this year.

The prosecutions were both brought by environmental health service department of Powys Council, the authority which licenced the business.

John Powell, cabinet member for environmental health, said: "The purpose of licensing the hackney carriage (taxis) and private hire trade is to ensure the safety of the public by ensuring that drivers are fit and proper and that the vehicles they drive are safe, suitable and reliable.

"This case should act as a warning to the trade that if they fail to obtain the necessary licences for their vehicles and drivers the council will take the appropriate action. Our licensing officers will continue to make sure that vehicles and their drivers comply with the important safeguards."

Benjamin was fined £600 for each of the charges, and ordered to pay £2,125 legal costs and a surcharge of £60, bringing the total to £5,185.

In May, he had pleaded guilty to offences at Llandrindod Wells Magistrates' Court, including employing an unlicensed driver to carry passengers, in a prosecuting also brought by the authority.

Benjamin pleaded guilty to three charges and was fined £350 for each of the charges. He was also ordered to pay £240 legal costs and a surcharge of £35, a total of £1,325.

It is the duty of all private hire operators to ensure that all vehicles and drivers employed by them are licensed to do so, in order to ensure both vehicles and drivers are safe and fit for purpose.

Read more at http://www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk ... FD3SvjL.99

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
Strange they didn't do him for having no insurance?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Even stranger that the Council did not revoke the operator license first time round,as he is clearly not a fit and proper person and he has definitely proved it beyond all reasonable doubt.

This Councils licensing procedures require investigating urgently.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20866
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Benjamin was fined £600 for each of the charges, and ordered to pay £2,125 legal costs and a surcharge of £60, bringing the total to £5,185.

In May, he had pleaded guilty to offences at Llandrindod Wells Magistrates' Court, including employing an unlicensed driver to carry passengers, in a prosecuting also brought by the authority.

Benjamin pleaded guilty to three charges and was fined £350 for each of the charges. He was also ordered to pay £240 legal costs and a surcharge of £35, a total of £1,325.


At this rate they won't need to he'll either give up or go bankrupt

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 12:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
Note he EMPLOYED the drivers...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 11:24 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57368
Location: 1066 Country
mancityfan wrote:
Strange they didn't do him for having no insurance?

Can the council prosecute for that?

Or the driver may have been issued with a fixed penalty ticket

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
If as stated he employs the drivers then he knowingly supplied a vehicle that was unfit for purpose to fulfil a booking by being uninsured due to it being driven by an unlicensed driver,one has to wonder how many journeys were actually undertaken using uninsured vehicles and unlicensed drivers.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sussex and 880 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group