Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed May 06, 2026 10:32 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Drivers to pay cost of Wigan taxi demand survey

Wigan Council commissioned a report into demand for Hackney Carriages

Wigan’s hackney carriage drivers will have to stump up the £7,000 cost of an independent survey that found there was no need for more vehicles.

As reported in the Evening Post last month, town hall officers had commissioned a report to see if the current amount of Hackney Carriages in service in the borough was suitable.

The independent assessment found there could have been a case for “significant unmet demand” but the closure of Morrisons in The Galleries has had a negative impact.

Several licence holders, who asked not to be named, questioned whether the town hall was correct in recovering the cost of survey from an increase to this year’s fee.

They claimed in the years since the last survey, hackney carriage drivers had been paying towards a fresh one, meaning those funds should have been used rather adding to next year’s payment.

However, town hall officers have moved to clarify the situation, explaining the fees paid in previous years had been spent on other “operational costs.”

A spokesman told the Evening Post: “The costs of all taxi licensing fees are reviewed on an annual basis and fees are calculated based on the costs incurred for the particular licence category.

“The cost of the previous survey was recovered through an increase in the hackney carriage vehicle licence fee at the time.

“All fees that vehicle owners have been paying since then have been to cover normal operational costs including licence processing, vehicle testing, enforcement and provision of taxi ranks.

“We have clearly explained this to vehicle owners over the past few months in detail to reassure them.”

A town hall committee last year ruled the borough was not in need of more hackney carriages following recommendations from council officers.

But the authority is required to carry out an independent review to ensure the correct decision had been made.

Specialists CTS carried out the survey, which included almost 300 hours of observation of taxi ranks across the borough. It concluded there no demand for more hackney carriage licences to be issued in the borough.

Licence holders are required by law to pay for such surveys and a recent council report reveals the £7,000 total will be recovered from the borough’s 136 drivers, at a rate of £51 each

source: http://www.wigantoday.net/news/drivers- ... -1-8276016

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
captain cab wrote:
Drivers to pay cost of Wigan taxi demand survey

Wigan Council commissioned a report into demand for Hackney Carriages

Wigan’s hackney carriage drivers will have to stump up the £7,000 cost of an independent survey that found there was no need for more vehicles.

As reported in the Evening Post last month, town hall officers had commissioned a report to see if the current amount of Hackney Carriages in service in the borough was suitable.

The independent assessment found there could have been a case for “significant unmet demand” but the closure of Morrisons in The Galleries has had a negative impact.

Several licence holders, who asked not to be named, questioned whether the town hall was correct in recovering the cost of survey from an increase to this year’s fee.

They claimed in the years since the last survey, hackney carriage drivers had been paying towards a fresh one, meaning those funds should have been used rather adding to next year’s payment.

However, town hall officers have moved to clarify the situation, explaining the fees paid in previous years had been spent on other “operational costs.”

A spokesman told the Evening Post: “The costs of all taxi licensing fees are reviewed on an annual basis and fees are calculated based on the costs incurred for the particular licence category.

“The cost of the previous survey was recovered through an increase in the hackney carriage vehicle licence fee at the time.

“All fees that vehicle owners have been paying since then have been to cover normal operational costs including licence processing, vehicle testing, enforcement and provision of taxi ranks.

“We have clearly explained this to vehicle owners over the past few months in detail to reassure them.”

A town hall committee last year ruled the borough was not in need of more hackney carriages following recommendations from council officers.

But the authority is required to carry out an independent review to ensure the correct decision had been made.

Specialists CTS carried out the survey, which included almost 300 hours of observation of taxi ranks across the borough. It concluded there no demand for more hackney carriage licences to be issued in the borough.

Licence holders are required by law to pay for such surveys and a recent council report reveals the £7,000 total will be recovered from the borough’s 136 drivers, at a rate of £51 each

source: http://www.wigantoday.net/news/drivers- ... -1-8276016

Good value for money...say I...what say you..

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57364
Location: 1066 Country
Well who else should pay for it other than those that benefit from it?

They can of course tell the council to not bother, but I doubt they would like the consequence of that action.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
£7000 for an independent survey and it appears some are winging about the cost,it has just cost us £13,000 for our survey.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:20 am
Posts: 2948
Location: Over here!
Imo, it is an unfair cost foisted upon the drivers by a Council department, who stand to gain from it, ie (the bigger the department) the bigger the salaries. In many respects it is an immoral way for the council to obtain a survey, as they stand to benefit from it (clearly a conflict of interest) by forcing others to pay for it.

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
£ 51 each or this viewtopic.php?f=5&t=195&start=20

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57364
Location: 1066 Country
cabby john wrote:
Imo, it is an unfair cost foisted upon the drivers by a Council department, who stand to gain from it, ie (the bigger the department) the bigger the salaries. In many respects it is an immoral way for the council to obtain a survey, as they stand to benefit from it (clearly a conflict of interest) by forcing others to pay for it.

Councils would gain bigger fleets, thus bigger fees, thus bigger departments if they didn't restrict.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:20 am
Posts: 2948
Location: Over here!
Sussex wrote:
cabby john wrote:
Imo, it is an unfair cost foisted upon the drivers by a Council department, who stand to gain from it, ie (the bigger the department) the bigger the salaries. In many respects it is an immoral way for the council to obtain a survey, as they stand to benefit from it (clearly a conflict of interest) by forcing others to pay for it.

Councils would gain bigger fleets, thus bigger fees, thus bigger departments if they didn't restrict.


Possibly! Having said that it is "The Council" that commissioned the report - (not the drivers). If it had gone the other way........The drivers still end up paying #-o something that is totally wrong.

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
Councils would gain bigger fleets, thus bigger fees, thus bigger departments if they didn't restrict.


:lol:

really

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 749 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group