Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu May 07, 2026 4:40 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Taxi firms call for Uber's licence to be revoked for breaches of city agreement


TAXI firms have called for Uber’s licence to operate in Brighton and Hove to be revoked.

Taxi drivers claim Uber drivers are illegally using taxi ranks to pick up customers while less than a quarter of the company’s drivers are licensed in the city.

It is also claimed that Uber drivers are obtaining licences from councils with lower standards hundreds of miles away to operate in Brighton and Hove.

Rising tension between Uber and taxi drivers boiled over this month with police investigating a scuffle at a taxi rank.

Uber said the taxi drivers’ complaints were based on city firms' fear of competition and claimed its drivers had faced intimidation and abuse.

The firm was granted a licence in October 2015 and began operating in the city 12 months later.

Within a month, licensing chairwoman Jackie O'Quinn called for a meeting with Uber in response to the number of Transport for London (TfL) licensed taxi drivers operating in the city.

She said the firm only received the licence to operate in the city on the grounds that they would use Brighton and Hove licensed drivers.

A taxi drivers’ forum will be held today [Wednesday] with bosses calling for their licence to be revoked and TfL inspectors to enforce regulations against Uber drivers because the city council’s enforcement team is powerless to intervene.

John Streeter, of Streamline Taxis, said: "We want the council to revoke their licence until they stand by their commitment to use Brighton and Hove licensed taxi drivers.

"They are not a fit and proper company to hold a licence.

"We don’t mind competition but it has to be a fair playing field.

"What Uber drivers are doing is going to the cheapest councils with the lowest standards in the country to get a licence even though they have no intention of operating there.

"We have got the highest standards of anywhere in the country and we don’t want them to drop."

An Uber spokesman said: “Since launching in Brighton we have been blown away with the demand we’ve seen for Uber, and more Brighton and Hove licensed private hire drivers are signing up to the app every week to help meet this demand.

"We have a good relationship with the council and have met the licensing committee who are happy with the way we’re operating under the conditions of our license.

"Uber is attending the meeting to discuss the intimidation and violence some drivers using our app have received in the city.”

A Brighton and Hove City Council spokeswoman said: "Taxi licensing officers are currently investigating complaints of vehicles other than Hackney Carriages parking on ranks and enforcement action will be taken in accordance with the council’s enforcement policy.

"The situation is being monitored. Uber was given a licence for a period of one year to enable the authority to monitor their operation."

source: http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/14979079 ... agreement/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
Another journalist/paper that only printed a fraction of what info they asked for.

My normal view is that the local trades should just ignore Uber as they thrive on all this publicity.

But those that represent the trade can only let so much go unnoticed.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20868
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Sussex wrote:
Another journalist/paper that only printed a fraction of what info they asked for.

My normal view is that the local trades should just ignore Uber as they thrive on all this publicity.

But those that represent the trade can only let so much go unnoticed.


but licensing sections can let everything go unnoticed :wink:

unless they need to be seen to be protecting the public

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 12:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
TAXI firms have called for Uber’s licence to operate in Brighton and Hove to be revoked


How will this help as drivers will just come from or get licenced from outside the area to complete the work

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
toots wrote:
Quote:
TAXI firms have called for Uber’s licence to operate in Brighton and Hove to be revoked


How will this help as drivers will just come from or get licenced from outside the area to complete the work

I suppose it would ensure those that are daft enough to book a uber car, will only get a non local car from god knows where.

Subtle difference but easier to compete against.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
I suppose it would ensure those that are daft enough to book a uber car, will only get a non local car from god knows where.

Subtle difference but easier to compete against.


You're presuming the passenger gives a flying fig - experience tells - they don't.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Sussex wrote:
I suppose it would ensure those that are daft enough to book a uber car, will only get a non local car from god knows where.

Subtle difference but easier to compete against.


You're presuming the passenger gives a flying fig - experience tells - they don't.

But it's easier to scaremonger, and punters generally don't like the surge.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 697 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group