Bizzare!
I see the STF has also changed tack slightly.
Before they were saying:
"Although the report to be completed by the summer of 2003 will not immediately affect the taxi industry in Scotland (taxi licensing is devolved to the Scottish Parliament) it is still a matter of great concern that removal of control of numbers in England and Wales will ultimately lead to a similar situation north of the border in Scotland."
Now they're saying:
"Unlike Westminster Departments, the Scottish Executive is not statutorily obliged to respond to the report. However, Scottish Ministers have agreed to respond."
I'm still not sure that they are correct.
In 2001 the Govt published a white paper, A World Class Competition Regime, in which they committed themselves to respond to OFT recommendations within 90 days. I don'tl think there is any statutory obligation to do so, as claimed by the STF.
Following devolution I think the Scottish and Northern Irish administrations agreed to do likewise.
So I think the position of Scotland, England and Wales and NI are the same - competiton issues are not devolved, and the OFT is the 'competition watchdog' for the whole UK. The OFT reviews markets and recommends changes, and the three administrations have agreed to respond withing 90 days, but ultimately it's up to them whether or not to implement the OFT's recommendations.
The 120 days response time for the taxi report is merely due to the NI elections, according to the OFT's press release.
It's interesting that the STF haven't actually posted any response to the OFT's report on their website, but they have posted Mr Muldoon's victory allowing him 'free parking' on Edinburgh taxi ranks.
'nuff said!
Dusty
