Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 1:37 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Magistrates fine Taxi driver who worked in Rugby £100 for overcharging passengers

https://www.rugbyadvertiser.co.uk/news/ ... -1-8591762

Magistrates handed a taxi driver who worked in Rugby a £100 fine for overcharging passengers after failing to switch on his cab's meter.

Cllr Lisa Parker, Rugby Borough Council portfolio holder for environment and public realm, said she hoped the prosecution of taxi driver Junedhai Motorwala will serve as a warning to the town's taxi drivers to abide by the licence conditions.

Mr Motorwala was working in Rugby town centre on New Year's Day when he picked up a couple near The Squirrel pub in Church Street. The couple asked to be taken to The Crown pub in Newbold, but a dispute over the fare started.

The passengers' account of the dispute differed to Mr Motorwala's - but both parties accepted the cab's meter was switched off for the duration of the journey and Motorwala took a fare of £10. On making a complaint to the council about the, one of the passengers said Motorwala had insisted the fare was a fixed rate of £15 before starting the journey and refused to switch on the meter.

The passenger said Motorwala then took the cab's tariff card - which should have been on display - from behind the sun visor, waved it at the couple and said: "I don't need the meter on. It's a fixed price all night."

On arriving in Newbold, the passenger said Motorwala again asked for £15 but, after being challenged over the meter being switched off, said: "Give me a tenner."

When interviewed by a licensing officer, Motorwala said when he was first asked about the cost of the journey, he had told the passengers the fare was approximately £11, to which one of the passengers offered to pay £10.

During the journey, Motorwala said one of the passengers started arguing about the fare but, on arrival in Newbold, reluctantly paid the £10. However, Motorwala accepted he had failed to switch the meter on and had overcharged the passengers - an offence under the terms of his taxi licence.

He insisted he had never switched off the meter while carrying passengers before, but also accepted the cab's tariff card should have been on display for passengers - another condition of the licence.

Motorwala, of Lowther Street, Coventry, pleaded guilty at Nuneaton's Warwickshire Justice Centre on Tuesday, July 31, to breaching the conditions of his taxi licence, an offence under section 58 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847.

Magistrates fined the 31-year-old £100 and ordered him to pay the council's costs, £758, and a £30 victim surcharge.

Cllr Parker said: "The majority of our taxi drivers deliver a high quality service, but we need the public's help to stop the minority who breach the taxi licence conditions."

"The conditions protect both drivers and passengers, ensuring fair competition between drivers and offering passengers set standards of service.

"We often receive reports of taxi drivers breaching conditions, but rarely with sufficient information to compile satisfactory evidence for prosecution.

"In this case, the passengers made a note of the driver's taxi plate number, which allowed us to identify and, ultimately, prosecute him.

"I'd encourage any passengers who feel a taxi driver has breached the conditions of the taxi licence to make a note of the plate number, vehicle registration or details of the make and model of the vehicle so we can take appropriate action."

Residents can make a complaint about the conduct of a taxi driver by calling 01788 533599 or emailing taxilicence@rugby.gov.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 2:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Seems to have gotten off relatively lightly compared to the Bristol driver suspended for six months, but of course it's not clear whether this is the end of the matter or whether he'll be further 'punished' by licensing councillors.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
StuartW wrote:
He insisted he had never switched off the meter while carrying passengers before,

Yeah right. :---)

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
The passengers' account of the dispute differed to Mr Motorwala's - but both parties accepted the cab's meter was switched off for the duration of the journey and Motorwala took a fare of £10

He insisted he had never switched off the meter while carrying passengers before, but also accepted the cab's tariff card should have been on display for passengers

hang on wasn't this prosecution for not using the meter but charging fixed price so surely it was meter not switched on at start not switched off part way through journey ?

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
edders23 wrote:
The passengers' account of the dispute differed to Mr Motorwala's - but both parties accepted the cab's meter was switched off for the duration of the journey and Motorwala took a fare of £10

He insisted he had never switched off the meter while carrying passengers before, but also accepted the cab's tariff card should have been on display for passengers

hang on wasn't this prosecution for not using the meter but charging fixed price so surely it was meter not switched on at start not switched off part way through journey ?


Well spotted, but suspect it's just clumsy wording, and 'switched off the meter' means same as 'not activating'.

Which is a distinction that a taxi driver might appreciate, but probably not so much a journalist or member of the public.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 605 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group