Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue May 05, 2026 8:53 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
Uber and Lyft stop hiring new drivers in New York City

Uber and Lyft have stopped accepting new drivers on their respective platforms in New York City. The move comes after the city passed new rules that are designed to curb the explosive growth of ride-hail companies.

On its website, Uber attributes the new policy to “new [Taxi and Limousine Commission] regulations.” This is a reference to legislation passed by the New York City Council in December 2018, which requires ride-hail companies to pay drivers at least $17.22 an hour after expenses. The pay formula uses a so-called “utilization rate,” which accounts for the share of time a driver spends with passengers in their vehicles compared to time spent idle and waiting for a fare.

The rules penalize companies for running too many cars without passengers on city streets. The higher a company’s utilization rate, the less it has to pay drivers to meet the new wage floor requirement. The rules were intended to increase pay for drivers, while also addressing what many saw as an oversaturated market in New York City.

In that sense, today’s news suggests the rules are having their desired effect. The wage rule was passed several months after the city council approved a new vehicle cap for Uber and Lyft in the hopes of reversing worsening traffic congestion. That rule doesn’t affect Uber and Lyft’s ability to onboard new drivers; it just restricts the number of vehicles that can be used to pick up passengers.

While wildly popular among riders, Uber and Lyft have been a source of almost constant grief for policymakers, disability advocates, taxi medallion holders, and labor groups. Critics complain that Uber and Lyft have been allowed to dominate the market without having to follow many of the same rules that apply to yellow taxis. This has led to a glut of drivers that has outstripped demand, driving down wages and increasing traffic congestion. At the time, New York City’s law capping the number of drivers was held up as a potential model for other cities that want to rein in the ride-hail industry.

Uber stopped onboarding new drivers in New York City on April 1st, followed soon after by Lyft. In January, Lyft sued the city to block the new wage rules, arguing that they would create an uneven playing field and would ultimately mean their own drivers would be paid less. Three weeks later, Uber sued the city over the cap on new ride-hail drivers.

“As drivers exit the industry and demand from riders increases, we will once again seek to add new drivers,” an Uber spokesperson said.

“Because of TLC regulations, we’re currently not accepting new drivers in New York City,” Lyft said. “We do have a waitlist and will let drivers know when they can apply to drive.”

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2019 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
On its website, Uber attributes the new policy to “new [Taxi and Limousine Commission] regulations.” This is a reference to legislation passed by the New York City Council in December 2018, which requires ride-hail companies to pay drivers at least $17.22 an hour after expenses. The pay formula uses a so-called “utilization rate,” which accounts for the share of time a driver spends with passengers in their vehicles compared to time spent idle and waiting for a fare.

could you imagine that being brought in by TFL :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2019 5:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:35 pm
Posts: 1855
I'd quite happily let Uber pay me £13 an hour after expenses. It's more than I take in total BEFORE expenses ! :sad:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 30, 2019 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
sasha wrote:
I'd quite happily let Uber pay me £13 an hour after expenses. It's more than I take in total BEFORE expenses ! :sad:



but not coming to any town in the UK as the tory party are so far up ubers backside we would be the last place in the world to adopt this

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Roy-the-bus and 695 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group