Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 8:23 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18513
Taxi drivers warned over 'inappropriate behaviour towards young girls'

https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/ ... ung-girls/

TAXI drivers in Torfaen were issued with written warnings over three complaints relating to “inappropriate behaviour towards young girls.”

Torfaen council’s licensing team immediately interviewed the drivers over the three incidents between April and September, and found the behaviour in each case was “inadvisable rather than unacceptable.”

One of the incidents involved a driver giving a cigarette to a 15-year-old girl.

At a licensing committee meeting on Thursday, Alison Hughes, the council’s licensing manager, said the drivers had been issued with written warnings over future conduct.

Cllr Norma Parrish said it was “really worrying” for three complaints to be made over the issue.

Ms Hughes said the drivers had acted “in all innocence” and said they will learn from their actions.

She said: “Even with the safeguard training, these drivers were not aware that something they did in all innocence, in other cases would be part of these girls being groomed.”

Ms Hughes said one of the incidents involved a driver giving a cigarette to an underage girl, which prompted concern as “cigarettes are often used as part of the grooming process.”

However when the council further investigated, it found the girl was known to be a regular smoker by the driver and others.

Ms Hughes said the girl asked the driver for a cigarette because she had run out, and he gave her one “off the cuff”, knowing she was a smoker.

When it was later explained to the driver that what happened could look like grooming, he said he did not realise and that he would not do it again, the meeting heard.

The people who had raised the complaint were satisfied by the explanation given, Ms Hughes added.

Cllr Parrish said it was “not a wise thing to do” by the driver, even if he knew she was a smoker.

Ms Hughes said the licensing team made that “very, very clear to him.”

“He has now understood he will not be doing it again,” she said.

A total of 29 complaints relating to taxi matters were made to Torfaen’s licensing team between April and September, with other incidents involving smoking and vehicles not arriving.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20852
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Quote:
“inadvisable rather than unacceptable.”


is there a difference ? :roll:

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
Quote:
“inadvisable rather than unacceptable.”


is there a difference ? :roll:

Yes.

It is inadvisable to go north of Gatwick, but it's not unacceptable. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 11:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18513
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
Quote:
“inadvisable rather than unacceptable.”


is there a difference ? :roll:

Yes.

It is inadvisable to go north of Gatwick, but it's not unacceptable. :wink:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

It's inadvisable to take heed of what Edders says, but not unacceptable :wink:

Although sometimes I think it should be both :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 16, 2019 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20852
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
StuartW wrote:
Sussex wrote:
edders23 wrote:
Quote:
“inadvisable rather than unacceptable.”


is there a difference ? :roll:

Yes.

It is inadvisable to go north of Gatwick, but it's not unacceptable. :wink:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

It's inadvisable to take heed of what Edders says, but not unacceptable :wink:

Although sometimes I think it should be both :shock:


only because sometimes you spout pure gibberish :wink:

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 16, 2019 12:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
edders23 wrote:
Quote:
“inadvisable rather than unacceptable.”


is there a difference ? :roll:

Yes, the spelling for a start.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 551 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group