Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Apr 26, 2026 10:46 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 3:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18500
Taxi driver wins bus gates fine battle against Kirklees Council

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/wes ... s-17605428

Mohammed Naim takes case to independent adjudicator after council refuses to cancel fines

Image
Image: Huddersfield Examiner

A taxi driver, who was fined for driving through a bus gate, has won a battle to have his tickets cancelled.

Mohammed Naim was caught driving his hackney carriage through a bus gate on Market Street, in Huddersfield town centre, on two occasions in October.

Hackney carriages – taxis which are licensed to ply for hire – are permitted to drive through the bus gate and use the bus lane.

But Kirklees Council issued two £60 fines as Mr Naim had failed to display a taxi sign on the roof of his Vauxhall Astra.

Mr Naim appealed to the council saying his vehicle was a hackney carriage regardless of whether it was carrying a taxi sign on the roof.

Kirklees Council, however, upheld the penalty charges saying: "Hackney carriage vehicles are authorised to access bus gates in Huddersfield but only when they are in use at the time and available for fee paying passenger journeys. Drivers cannot use the bus gate for their own convenience."

But Mr Naim, who has held a hackney carriage licence for 30 years, took the decision to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal who overturned the council's fines.

The parking adjudicator said: "The fact that Mr Naim has not provided evidence he was carrying a passenger at the time is therefore irrelevant. The question in this appeal then is whether a potential breach of the licence conditions by failing to display a roof top sign means that the vehicle is no longer a licensed hackney carriage. The answer to that question is no and the vehicle remains at all times a hackney carriage...

"I conclude that regardless of whether the roof top sign was present or not, the vehicle was in law a licensed hackney carriage at the time it used the bus gate and no contravention occurred on either occasion."

Mr Naim, 55, of Birkby, said he was pleased with the decision but disappointed with how Kirklees Council handled his case.

He said: "A hackney carriage vehicle is a taxi 24/7 regardless of the roof sign or not. The roof sign was removed because the vehicle had been on the motorway and it is normal practice to take the roof sign off for safety reasons.

"The council left me with no alternative but to appeal against the two penalty charges. Today I have won both appeals.

"Surely the council should (know) better? Disappointed with council's approach to this issue."

Kirklees Council has been approached for comment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 9:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
StuartW wrote:

He said: " The roof sign was removed because the vehicle had been on the motorway and it is normal practice to take the roof sign off for safety reasons.

It may be "normal practice" to you but is it legal?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 12:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 3:00 am
Posts: 105
Location: Wolverton, buckinghamshire
grandad wrote:
StuartW wrote:

He said: " The roof sign was removed because the vehicle had been on the motorway and it is normal practice to take the roof sign off for safety reasons.

It may be "normal practice" to you but is it legal?


He won the case, If it was Illegal he wouldn't of won the case.

I have seen in many areas Roof signs off but a Hackney carriage plate on the back.

I believe many Hackney Saloon drivers when not working remove the Taxi roof sign, Even know in My area drivers only have roof sign and Plate on only when working, Rest of the time Day/Evening/Night Weekends Holidays Drive with the Plate off and Roof sign off.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20847
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
the other half of one of my drivers never goes near the rank and mainly does airport work the only time his roof sign goes on his car is for the 6 monthly compliance test

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 1:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
rashid wrote:
grandad wrote:
StuartW wrote:

He said: " The roof sign was removed because the vehicle had been on the motorway and it is normal practice to take the roof sign off for safety reasons.

It may be "normal practice" to you but is it legal?[/quote

He won the case, If it was Illegal he wouldn't of won the case.

I have seen in many areas Roof signs off but a Hackney carriage plate on the back.

I believe many Hackney Saloon drivers when not working remove the Taxi roof sign, Even know in My area drivers only have roof sign and Plate on only when working, Rest of the time Day/Evening/Night Weekends Holidays Drive with the Plate off and Roof sign off.
I think he won the case in this instance because the law says that once licensed the vehicle is always licensed until it is no longer licensed. maybe I put my point incorrectly and should have put is it abiding by the licensing conditions?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
I doubt the Traffic Order states 'Only Hackneys whilst working', thus the council got it wrong, as determined by the adjudicator.

I suspect bus gate is enforced by cameras operated by people, and those people saw a saloon car not a taxi.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2020 1:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Sussex wrote:
I doubt the Traffic Order states 'Only Hackneys whilst working', thus the council got it wrong, as determined by the adjudicator.

I suspect bus gate is enforced by cameras operated by people, and those people saw a saloon car not a taxi.


I think if camera was positioned to take photograph of rear of vehicle the license plate would be visible.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 588 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group