edders23 wrote:
assuming the driver is honest about it

if he's not on a database how would they know if he didn't declare
Heathcote is correct if the new LA requires a Group 2 medical (or even any kind of medical), but if the council only requires self-declaration then you're correct.
Quote:
Clearly naughty drivers can go f*** themselves, but if someone has had their license removed under health grounds it would be a bit mean putting them on any forbidden list.
Ditto above - it's not a 'forbidden' list, strictly speaking, because there's nothing illegal about one LA refusing a driver but another LA approving him.
Seems to me more LAs getting the full information so they can properly assess an application, and it helps prevent non-disclosure and outright misrepresentation.
And it stands to reason that if an applicant is rejected by one LA, then applies to another, he'll be more tempted to leave vital information out, or whatever. Hence the database.