Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 11:19 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2021 4:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18540
Taxi strike in May could cause major disruption during Eid, organisers claim

https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/ ... ebrations/

Image

A TAXI drivers action group is planning to strike two days in May, which could cause major disruption to Eid celebrations across Bradford.

Bradford Taxi Action Group (BTAG) is calling for a full strike on May 13 and 14 unless Bradford Council responds to concerns about plans to introduce a Clean Air Zone (CAZ) in January.

In a letter to the council, Asif Shah, chairman of BTAG, wrote: "We are still awaiting a response from an email sent to the Council Leader and Chief Executive on March 18 in relation to the CAZ queries.

"If we don’t get a response by May 4, then we will have no option but to call for a full strike to take place on Thursday, May 13, and Friday, May 14, to coincide with Eid celebrations which will undoubtedly create problems for the city."

Mr Shah did say that a strike would cause significant disruption as approximately 70 per cent of operators across the city support BTAG.

It follows on from a previous taxi strike about the Clean Air Zone on March 12, which Mr Shah said had a "very successful turnout of 500 to 600 drivers".

The CAZ would see the most polluting vehicles charged to enter much of the city centre.

Although private cars will not be charged, taxis and private hire vehicles that do not meet up to date emission standards would have to pay £12.50 per day to enter the city.

"There is frustration amongst members," said Mr Shah. "We don't want to strike because it's not in the interest of anybody.

"But if we do strike it will bring the transport industry in Bradford to it knees."

Mr Shah also said BTAG are frustrated that the council will not recognise them as a trade association.

Mr Shah said getting recognised as an association by Bradford Council would give BTAG "some communication with the licensing service"

"It would allow us to put the views of our members' views forward, particularly during licensing meetings."

However, Mr Shah explained that council would not recognise BTAG unless they release membership details.

"They're asking us to disclose membership details, which a lot of members do not want to do," said Mr Shah.

In a letter to BTAG, a council solicitor explained: " I cannot see how the council can recognise a trade association unless its membership can be verified. Only the names, badge/ plate numbers and contact details of members would be required for this purpose."

A spokesperson for Bradford Council said: “The council works well with a number of trade organisations which represent the taxi trade and they comply with the rules set out.

“The council is under a Government directive to introduce a Clean Air Zone and is therefore duty bound to comply.

“We are continuing to have conversations with the trade to support drivers to adapt. We value the district’s taxi drivers as an important part of our public transport service, they have had a very difficult year and we are grateful for all they have done in these challenging times.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2021 4:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18540
Quote:
However, Mr Shah explained that council would not recognise BTAG unless they release membership details.

"They're asking us to disclose membership details, which a lot of members do not want to do," said Mr Shah.

In a letter to BTAG, a council solicitor explained: " I cannot see how the council can recognise a trade association unless its membership can be verified. Only the names, badge/ plate numbers and contact details of members would be required for this purpose."

Very like the dispute in nearby Wakefield about six months ago. That was over emmissions policy as well, and the council wouldn't recognise the new group, although the intention there was to hold a demonstration rather than a strike:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=36295&p=404990


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2021 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
However, Mr Shah explained that council would not recognise BTAG unless they release membership details.

Even if he had the details he couldn't release those details to the council unless he wanted to be prosecuted.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2021 6:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Sussex wrote:
Quote:
However, Mr Shah explained that council would not recognise BTAG unless they release membership details.

Even if he had the details he couldn't release those details to the council unless he wanted to be prosecuted.


Another example of a Council and its employees demanding to know information they are not entitled to know, smacks of blacklisting and we all know the outcome of the court case involving blacklisting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 18, 2021 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I think the main problem here is that each "trade body" represents a trade faction

One reason why we don't have one here is because half the trade wants a trade association which devotes 99% of it's time to screaming racism every time someone says boo to a muslim driver and the other half wants only the owners interests promoted

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 18, 2021 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
But even if the fella said I only represent myself, the council should still take note of his views.

If the fella has announced a strike, and many drivers take part in it, then that in itself is evidence of his standing.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 18, 2021 4:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I was once told by an LO that to be taken seriously by a council you must represent 60% minimum of the drivers/cars

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 19, 2021 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
I was once told by an LO that to be taken seriously by a council you must represent 60% minimum of the drivers/cars

But your council are a basket case, so what more would you expect?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerberus and 723 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group