Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 9:29 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 8:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
Taxi driver fined while collecting disabled passenger from Dundee support centre

A taxi firm has pled with owners of a private car park to take a “common sense approach” after a driver was fined for collecting a disabled passenger.

A Tay Taxis driver was fined while collecting a passenger in a wheelchair from support service Capability Scotland in Camperdown Street at City Quay, Dundee.

He was fined £170 by Euro Car Parks after spending 29 minutes in the area managed by the firm.

Capability Scotland work with disabled children and adults and has a long-term contract with Tay Taxis for service users to be dropped-off and collected safely.

A 15-minute free waiting period is offered but Tay Taxis director Charlie Duthie said this is not long enough to safely collect disabled passengers.

‘Common sense approach’

Mr Duthie has been pleading with the land owner’s property management company since the fine was received in March, without success.

“A common sense approach has got to be put in place here with this,” he said.

“We have been trying to contest the decision on his [driver’s] behalf with the property management company representing the owner.

“Eventually the driver paid a fine of £170, as there was threats of legal of action, despite our ongoing discussions.

“We have daily runs to Capability Scotland and have done so for a number of years, there is a great relationship there with the charity.

“All the drivers know the various needs of the passenger and it can take varying degrees of time to get people on and off safely.

“We’ve tried to explain this repeatedly to firm representing the owner but they are not prepared to extend the gratis period, despite now knowing the nature of the taxi fares.

“Unfortunately there is no way around it for us, we need to be parked there to get them on and off safely.

“For safety reasons I would urge a reconsideration to the current stance and extend the gratis period.”

Mr Duthie also believes the fine should be reimbursed.

He added: “No one else was even parked there, as it was during lockdown, it was completely empty.

“The owner of the taxi and his family took the decision to pay it given the threats were made of further action.”

Degree of flexibility

Capability Scotland bosses also plan to contact the car park operators, in support of the taxi driver.

“We are disappointed that a taxi driver is the subject of legal action,” a spokesman said.

“To our knowledge, drivers take only the amount of time required to pick up or drop off our customers.

“Given the service they are providing to disabled people who rely on this transport to attend City Quay, we would have hoped for a degree of flexibility from the operators of the car park in such matters.

“We will certainly take this issue up with the operators and with the local authority.”

Euro Car Park did not respond to a request for comment.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 15, 2021 8:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
“Eventually the driver paid a fine of £170, as there was threats of legal of action, despite our ongoing discussions.

Then the driver is as thick as pigs sh**. #-o

Unlike down here the owner of the vehicle in Scotland has no duty to name the driver, and it's only the driver that can be taken to the small claims court.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 12:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18540
Sussex wrote:
Unlike down here the owner of the vehicle in Scotland has no duty to name the driver, and it's only the driver that can be taken to the small claims court.

So what happens if the tickets are just ignored?

It was the same City Quay area where the woman ignored £24k worth of parking tickets and ended up bankrurpt in 2017.

Different parking company (unless they've changed their name), but presumably potentially a similar process.

So wouldn't be surprised if the likes of that wasn't preying on the driver's mind. But somehow I don't think he'll be doing any more WAV jobs there.

However, unlike the lady below, I'm guessing some sort of compromise will be reached in the current case.


Dundee woman hit with landmark £24k parking charge declared bankrupt

https://www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk/fp/d ... -bankrupt/

A Dundee woman who was ordered to pay £24,000 in a landmark parking charge court ruling has been declared bankrupt.

Carly Mackie, 28, then of Fintry, parked outside her parents’ City Quay home and ignored the almost-daily parking tickets left on her windscreen.

She wrongly believed she was entitled to park her Mini in front of her family’s garage near their West Victoria Dock Road home and that the tickets were unenforceable.

However, private firm Vehicle Control Services took her to court last year when she racked up an £18,500 bill for ignoring more than 200 penalties.

Now, the Tele can reveal that Ms Mackie has been declared bankrupt with debts totalling £37,546.84.

Documents lodged with the Accountant in Bankruptcy (AIB) show that she has now left Dundee and moved to Paisley and that she is working as a member of the cabin crew with airline Thomas Cook.

The AIB is the Scottish Government agency responsible for administering the process of personal bankruptcy and corporate insolvency,

Sheriff George Way ordered Ms Mackie to pay the sum after she had “entirely misdirected herself on both the law and the contractual chain in this case”.

He said the pursuers believed she had been engaged in a “personal crusade” to prove the charges were unenforceable.

The sheriff said in his judgment: “She knew perfectly well what the signs displayed and that she was parking in breach of the conditions.

“She stated (effectively a protest position) that parking charges were illegal and unenforceable in Scotland and that she could park where she liked as her father’s guest.

“The defender is not the tenant. The defender’s car was an additional burden on the parking facilities and she was the same as any other interloper.

“She was offered a permit by the factors (at a reasonable charge I think) but she refused on principle.”

Sheriff Way added: “Parking is not only an amenity but a valuable commodity in modern life.”

The Tele attempted to contact Ms Mackie but had not received a response at the time of going to press.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
So what happens if the tickets are just ignored?

Don't have to ignore them, just write to the company as the keeper of the vehicle, but refuse to name the driver.

I'm guessing the lady concerned admitted being the driver, or the only driver.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2021 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
it is such a shame this goes on surely these parking companies must realise there is merit in being kind as well as good publicity

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 6:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:

Unlike down here the owner of the vehicle in Scotland has no duty to name the driver, and it's only the driver that can be taken to the small claims court.

I didn't think that the owner in England had to identify the driver if the parking was in a private car park.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 6:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18540
Sussex wrote:
Quote:
So what happens if the tickets are just ignored?

Don't have to ignore them, just write to the company as the keeper of the vehicle, but refuse to name the driver.

I'm guessing the lady concerned admitted being the driver, or the only driver.

According to this it's not quite as cut and dried as that, although I'm not sure if the proposed legislation that's mentioned was ever passed:

Advice Scotland wrote:
If you are the Registered Keeper of a car but were not driving it at the time the fine was charged, you can argue that you are not liable for the fine.

To do this, you would need to notify the Company, once you receive the notice.

It is likely you will be expected to give the name and contact details of the person that was driving the vehicle. If you don’t, then at present although there is no concept of Registered Keeper’s liability in Scotland, a Court may presume, in the absence of you identifying the driver, that you were the driver.

The law in Scotland is expected to change with the introduction of the Transport (Scotland) Bill, which will introduce the concept of Registered Keepers Liabilty.

This will mean where the identity of the driver is not known, the Registered Keeper can be held liable.

Maybe the driver's name had been disclosed already, or they decided that the risk wasn't worth it :?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2021 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57359
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
Sussex wrote:

Unlike down here the owner of the vehicle in Scotland has no duty to name the driver, and it's only the driver that can be taken to the small claims court.

I didn't think that the owner in England had to identify the driver if the parking was in a private car park.

If they don't then they become liable.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 757 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group