More murkiness in Sandwell
Don't know if there's anything in it, but as usual the blizzard of comms blather in response to the criticisms sounds compelling enough. At face value, anyway
Taxi firms under previous scrutiny by auditors get new contract with Sandwell councilhttps://www.birminghammail.co.uk/black- ... y-24946553Grant Thornton had previously questioned why four large contracts with two taxi firms was approved of which the director had links to Sandwell councilTwo taxi and private hire companies previously under intense scrutiny for misleading councillors have had their contracts renewed by Sandwell council this week.
North Birmingham Travel and County Cars, along with seven other taxi companies, will both deliver home-to-school transport for vulnerable children across the Sandwell borough.
After intense media scrutiny last year - where it was revealed taxi employees did not hold DBS certificates at neighbouring councils - new drivers and passenger assistants will undergo rigorous checks and safeguarding training before taking children to school in the new term.
But Companies Houses documents show North Birmingham Travel under a ‘compulsory strike off’ as recently as August 30. County Cars had a similar strike-off in March this year, before being discontinued in May.
A company will receive a compulsory strike-off notice when it fails to file its accounts with Companies House in time. North Birmingham Travel’s accounts have not been updated since March 2021, according to Companies Houses.
Councillor Jay Anandou told the Local Democracy Reporting Service he has written to Sandwell council “four times” with his concerns about the scheme.
In a letter posted online, he said: “I have deep concerns about the current model which is neither entrepreneurial from a business perspective, nor creating value for taxpayers money.
“The Sandwell public entrusts us to manage and scrutinise millions and millions worth of hard-earned taxpayers money, especially in times of soaring energy prices, the cost of living, and we as Sandwell council are very far from being entrepreneurial.
“I have repeatedly requested the council to allow members to scrutinise the new SEND model before implementation, which was ignored, and the result yet again [is] a flawed process.
“I urge the scrutiny board to call for a discussion in the next available opportunity to make sure next year’s procurement model is reviewed and securitised before implementing.”
Contracts for home-to-school transport services for vulnerable children made news in August last year after neighbouring Birmingham city council had terminated its contract with North Birmingham Travel. The council found discrepancies in DBS checks for more than 50 employees and potential ‘deliberate tampering’ with a document, according to a council report.
It was revealed 59 out of 110 employees listed by the company to provide the service for Birmingham city counci l did not have a confirmed DBS check in place, council compliance officers found. North Birmingham Travel has since had its contract terminated after an emergency meeting.
Azeem Hafeez, director of North Birmingham Travel and County Cars, a lso had a four-year transport contract with Sandwell council. It emerged Mr Hafeez, the son of former Sandwell council deputy leader Mahboob Hussain, were both named in the 2016 Wragge Report over dodgy land deals. The report was a significant reason for government-appointed commissioners to enter the council in March.
The decision to award the contracts came after Grant Thornton, the external auditor into governance at Sandwell council, had questioned why four large contracts with just two companies were approved, who in themselves come under the ownership of one individual.
Last year, Rajbir Singh, the previous leader of Sandwell council, had halted proceedings to award the contract to Mr Hafeez’s firms and established an internal review to understand how the award was made.
Despite intense scrutiny related to the award of the contract, minutes at a children’s services and education scrutiny board meeting noted: “processes for checking DBSs within Sandwell was different; checks were conducted in-house and the leader of the council had instructed that all DBSs should be re-checked to provide additional assurances”.
The internal review, excluding the public and press, was leaked to the Local Democracy Reporting Service , which found Sandwell council had ‘ no written record ’ on the decision to award Mr Hafeez the £20 million contract. It also found council officers failed to declare if they have any potential conflict of interests.
Councillor Simon Hackett, Sandwell council's cabinet member for children and education, said: “We are committed to giving children and young people in Sandwell the best possible start in life. We’re determined to support children and young people the best way we can, and this new model for SEND transport will provide them with the highest quality services to travel between home and school.
“This procurement exercise has been carried out in a fair and transparent way for all potential providers. We have followed a clear and consistent process to assess each bid with moderation provided by external legal advisors, as was set out at the beginning of this process.
When queried by the LDRS on the award of contracts to North Birmingham Travel and County Cars, councillor Hackett added: “In designing this new process for awarding contracts for SEND transport we have implemented all recommendations made by our external auditors and from an internal review carried out after the last procurement exercise.
“We have also received independent legal advice in order to design this new framework that ensures we can provide high quality services for families in Sandwell, alongside attracting multiple providers that delivers value for money for the council and means we can maintain a resilient service.
“This procurement exercise has been carried out in a fair, robust and transparent way for all potential providers. We have followed a clear and consistent process to assess each bid with moderation provided by external legal advisors, as was set out at the beginning of this process.”
The LDRS attempted to contact Mr Hafeez for comment but he did not respond to our requested deadline.
Previously Mr Hafeez told local media : "We are very proud of what we do. We deliver services to exceptional standards and pride ourselves in going beyond what’s required and it’s a shame that we have now lost the opportunity to show all the hard work that has gone into preparing for this coming term for our Birmingham families.
"It’s been presented by the council and so in the subsequent media reports in a way that we feel is trashing our reputation, which we have worked hard to gain, supported by our committed workforce."