Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Dec 24, 2025 2:49 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 3:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 17497
So problems when 24x7 took over the 'one school' contracts in Sussex, but sounds a good bit worse in Southend when 24x7 *lost* the whole lot to a joint venture involving the council.

I suppose transferring a shedload of school runs with special needs kids is never likely to happen without at least some glitches, but this sounds quite bad :?


Southend SEN school transport chaos: Vecteo botches service takeover

https://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/195624 ... -takeover/

In scenes of absolute chaos children with autism were left waiting hours for school buses or asked to get into taxis alone without assistants as the handover of SEN school transport from one company to another was completely botched.

The start of a new term at St Christopher’s in Leigh was plagued by transportation issues as Vecteo took over Southend Council’s provision of school transportation for children with special educational needs.

Vecteo, a joint venture between Southend Borough Council and London Hire Community Services, was set up to provide transport services for the council. Previously, the service had been run by 24x7 school transport.

Parents were left waiting until the night before the start of term before hearing from Vecteo, with parents texted and called by passenger assistants – tasked with assisting the children and keeping them safe on the journey to school – to introduce themselves.

For safeguarding purposes, parents were desperate for their children to meet drivers and assistants prior to school commencing, to inform them of the challenges unique to each child.

On Thursday, September 2, the first day of term, dozens of parents were left stranded with their child, waiting for a school bus to turn up. Some were left waiting for hours.

Others were informed their bus had been cancelled at the last minute and instead a taxi was sent to their door, without a chaperone on board.

Adrian Dickinson, 50, whose autistic son goes to The St Christopher’s school, said: “We were expecting a minibus to turn up. What actually turned up was an everyday taxi to pick up my son.

“I cannot believe that whoever is responsible for this would think it’s okay to send a taxi to pick up an autistic child with special needs. How they expected a parent to put their autistic child in a taxi when they have never met this driver before and just say ‘off you go then’ is just ludicrous.”

Outraged parents say they were unable to contact Vecteo and claim the council were directing them to call the company.

Tillie Waterman, whose son also goes to St Christopher’s school, said she was ‘frustrated’ with how her child had been treated.

She said her autistic son was left in tears as they waited for over an hour for the school bus to arrive.

“We have never had a problem with the old provider 24/7,” she said.

In a letter sent to parents following the fiasco, Vecteo cited “major issues” with staff transferring across to the company from the previous provider..

The letter read: “Vecteo fully realise this is far from ideal and not the start of the new school term we wanted. Also, we are acutely aware of the adverse effect and issues it has caused many children and their families and we are very sorry for the anxiety caused.”

Simi Wilson, who also has an autistic son at The St Christopher’s, said: “Southend Council changed to Vecteo without consulting the parents. I knew nothing of it until I received a letter in the first week of August.

“The first I heard from them was a text from a lady saying she was the passenger assistant the night before my son’s first day back.

“I don’t think anybody would release their child to a stranger. I don’t know who she is, she could be anybody.”

Cllr Laurie Burton, Southend’s cabinet member for children and learning said: “We deeply regret the quality of service some children using home to school transport received at the beginning of the new school year. It is simply not acceptable, and I am sorry for any distress and upset it may have caused.

“Working within SEND, we know how important it is for children to receive a regular, reliable, and punctual school transport service. We also understand how important it is for some children that the service is familiar to them, with the same driver, passenger assistant and vehicle taking them to and from school each day, wherever possible.

“Once the issues are fixed, we will be speaking with Vecteo to find out what went wrong, why and find out how we can prevent it from ever happening again.”


Vecteo says taxis were sent without assistants 'accidentally'

https://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/195693 ... identally/

Taxis sent to pick up autistic children without trained assistants to keep children safe were “accidentally operated by mistake”, the provider has said.

The start of a new term at St Christopher’s in Leigh was marred by transportation chaos as children with special educational needs were left waiting hours for buses or being told to get into taxis alone without support staff.

The chaos unfolded last week as children returned to school with Southend Council having swapped transport provider from 24x7 to Vecteo.

Vecto – a joint venture between the council and London Hire Community Services – has issued a statement apologising for the blunder-filled takeover.

Parents were left fuming after the company failed to organise meet and greets before the start of term. Meet and greets are a safeguarding necessity, for the children to meet their drivers and passenger assistants and for parents to inform the assistants of their child's personal needs.

In a recent statement the firm has claimed the taxis which were sent as replacements for bus services which were cancelled at the last minute, were "accidentally" sent without Passenger Assistants.

Richard Gerard-Sharp, Vecteo’s transport manager, said: “Vecteo would like to sincerely apologise for the disruption to transport services, particularly to St. Christopher’s School.

“To try and ease the situation taxi services were employed on the September 2 to provide additional cover. A small number were accidentally operated by mistake without Passenger Assistants. This error was identified and corrected straight away. A full investigation as to how this error arose will be conducted in due course, once all services are settled.

Mr Gerard-Sharp added: “Letters have been sent to parents affected providing the assurance that every effort is being made to improve these essential services. Where services have not met standards parents and carers would expect, we can only apologise and strive to ensure a safe and stable service is delivered moving forward."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20615
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I wonder if this is the same lot that took over the sussex contracts :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
It makes you wonder if it's not little Brown envelopes that wins these contracts rather than price and capability.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20615
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
It's a "Joint venture company" in other words a vehicle to pay the councillors many of whom are directors of the company

our council has set up about half a dozen of them all of whom have council cabinet members on their boards of directors

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56830
Location: 1066 Country
Never been a fan of school runs other than covering mate's runs.

But one thing I will say is that school runs should be undertaken by local firms using local drivers.

It never ends well when councils try and save money using firms from 100s of miles away. [-(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group