Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 3:58 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Brighton Uber driver victim of false sexual assault claim

https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/1956788 ... ult-claim/

Image

A FATHER has spoken of his ordeal after being falsely accused of sexual assault by a passenger in his Uber.

A review of CCTV inside his car found full-time driver Islam Rushdi, 39, was the victim of a false accusation "probably just made to get a refund", according to Brighton and Hove City Council.

Council officials demanded Uber remove the allegation from his personal record and reinstate the driver "as soon as possible".

However, it failed to do so for nearly a month, leaving Mr Rushdi thousands of pounds out of pocket.

"I think they should be punished for making this false complaint," said Mr Rushdi, who lives in Hove and has three children.

"This is one of the most serious allegations you can make about someone, next to murder and rape.

"It could have changed my life, it could have led to suicide.

"I feel I'm very lucky because my CCTV was working."

The female passenger was taken from university halls of residence in Lewes Road, Brighton, to a 24-hour shop in Richmond Parade on July 31.

She returned from shop, got back into the vehicle with some bread and was taken back to the accommodation.

Mr Rushdi was later told by Uber she had claimed he had touched her leg after locking the car doors.

This claim was passed on to the licensing team at Brighton and Hove City Council, which reviewed footage inside the car.

A licensing enforcement officer then emailed Uber saying that he could " confirm that the allegation is false and probably just made to get a refund of the fare paid".

He said Mr Rushdi should be reinstated as soon as possible and the permanent record of the complaint should be expunged from his driver record.

Uber did not reactivate his account until August 27, nearly a month after the false allegation was made.

Mr Rushdi and his family said they were "denied an income" during this time and were struggling to keep up with specialist vehicle financing and insurance.

"If I had no CCTV in my car, I would have been done," said Mr Rushdi. "My car is on finance, I rent the house, I have three children, bills to pay, loans, so many things.

"It's not fair at all that if someone complains that your account will be blocked without an investigation.

"The council reviewed the CCTV within three days, but they blocked my account a month."

Uber was contacted for comment.

Brighton and Hove City Council said: “We always investigate as quickly as possible any serious allegations made against local taxi drivers.

“Taxis have CCTV installed in them these days. In this instance we were able to review the footage very quickly and respond to the company that contacted us.

“In this instance we did not consider it appropriate to notify the police.

“Any possible further action relating to this incident would be a matter for the taxi company and/or the driver, not the council.”

The App Drivers and Couriers Union (ADCU) said: "Too often private hire drivers are victims of false and vexatious allegations from customers seeking an easy refund. False allegations of a sexual nature can destroy lives, drive people to ill health and in some cases can lead to suicide.

"Uber management openly admit that while they know passengers do make up false allegations with the motive of securing a dishonest refund which Uber deducts from driver's wages, they nevertheless err on the side of believing the passenger.

"Brighton and Hove Council must now step in and review Uber's security procedures in partnership with trade unions to ensure passengers and licensed drivers are properly protected."

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Anyone out there still doubt the benefits of CCTV, and why it should be made mandatory?

All that said well done to B&H licensing.

Shame on Uber, and shame on the slag who made the false allegation.

It could have left the driver in ruins and possibly dead. :sad: :sad: :sad: :sad: :sad: :sad: :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 10, 2021 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
I'm told there is going to be a demonstration in support of the driver and in support of action to be taken against Uber for their inaction following the driver getting the all-clear from the council.

Thursday September 16th by the Cricket Ground.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 17, 2021 9:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Uber drivers hold protest outside office in Brighton

Image

A PROTEST has been held outside Brighton's Uber office after a driver remained banned for a month despite a claim he had sexually assaulted a passenger being found to be false within days.

A review of CCTV inside the car of full-time driver Islam Rushdi, 39, found the father-of-three was the victim of a false accusation "probably just made to get a refund", according to Brighton and Hove City Council.

Council officials demanded Uber remove the allegation from his personal record and reinstate the driver "as soon as possible".

However, the global rideshare giant failed to do so for nearly a month, leaving Mr Rushdi thousands of pounds out of pocket.

They waved flags and held speeches to protest "the unfair dismissals and failure to implement Supreme Court ruling on worker rights".

James Farrar, ADCU General Secretary said: "Uber's treatment of Islam Rushdi and other ADCU Brighton members is unacceptable in the modern day.

"Uber are privileged to be allowed to operate in Brighton but in return Brighton and Hove City Council must protect licensed private hire drivers from exploitation."

The union is demanding that Uber compensate Mr Rushdi for lost earnings for the period and apologise for the length of time he was suspended. They also want to end Uber's "arbitrary and unfair dismissal of drivers in Brighton".

They also demand Uber to "abide by the Supreme Court ruling and pay drivers for all of their working time", and are also calling for them to raise fares to £2 per mile and reduce its commission take from drivers from 25 per cent to 15 per cent.

Speaking previously about his case, Mr Rushdi said: "I think they should be punished for making this false complaint.

"This is one of the most serious allegations you can make about someone, next to murder and rape.

"It could have changed my life, it could have led to suicide.

"I feel I'm very lucky because my CCTV was working."

Uber was contacted for comment.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2021 4:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
How long is the footage stored for? Problem with some of these complaints (like the Liverpool one this week) is that it's often several days until they're properly investigaged, if not weeks, months or even years after the event.

By which time I'd imagine the average driver's equipment would have loop-recorded over the relevant footage, although obviously things are more heavily regulated by the council in Brighton.

(Recall the Lanarkshire PHD accused of running over and killing the punter, and who was accused of destroying dashcam evidence by continuing to work and thus recording over the footage.)

But this is just an extreme example of the recent Uber fares complaints thing and that a driver had umpteen 'complaints' against his name - just because a complaint is lodged it doesn't necessarily mean anything.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2021 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
StuartW wrote:
How long is the footage stored for? Problem with some of these complaints (like the Liverpool one this week) is that it's often several days until they're properly investigaged, if not weeks, months or even years after the event.

B&H CCTV rules say 28 days.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 772 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group