Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 11:42 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
StuartW wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Most of the operators in London, as elsewhere, don't take a % off every job.

Many take a % off account work, but not cash/card work.

You mean as regards the VAT issue?

Can't see how the difference between a fixed fee and % based model has any bearing on any aspect of the case [-(

I do mean the VAT issue.

Umpteen cases on here which say that if an operator takes a cut of the fare, be that cash/card or account, then VAT is payable by the operator on the whole fare, not just the cut.

In short if they don’t take a cut then they can argue they are acting as an agent, if they take a cut they are acting as a principal.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 3:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Now as far as I have been told, VAT is already included in hackney fares and must be accounted for if the driver is taking above the VAT threshold. Not many drivers will be doing that as individuals but office bases taking bookings may well have to account for the VAT on all pre bookings.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 3:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18540
Sussex wrote:
Umpteen cases on here which say that if an operator takes a cut of the fare, be that cash/card or account, then VAT is payable by the operator on the whole fare, not just the cut.

In short if they don’t take a cut then they can argue they are acting as an agent, if they take a cut they are acting as a principal.

Gotcha. To be honest, I'm not that up to speed with the VAT stuff. But of course there are parallels with the employment status issue.

And to that extent I don't really see the difference between drivers paying a fixed fee or a %age fee. It's just a different way of the driver paying the operator rather than anything more substantive in economic terms.

Of course, yesterday's judgement wasn't about the VAT dimension, but it's obviously fundamental to it, so it will be interesting to see how HMRC approaches it, and whether it's considered relevant to the difference between fixed or %age fees paid by drivers to circuits.

Or at least that's my opinion, but obviously the current case law views things differently [-(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 3:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18540
Grandad wrote:
Now as far as I have been told, VAT is already included in hackney fares and must be accounted for if the driver is taking above the VAT threshold. Not many drivers will be doing that as individuals but office bases taking bookings may well have to account for the VAT on all pre bookings.

Well indeed that's a mega-important point as regards any change in the VAT question as regards HC circuits. They can't just add VAT on to the fare, and must retain the regulated tariffs, and to that extent would be forced to take the VAT hit.

But if Sussex is right then it won't impact them anyway, because their fee model means that they're an agent, not a principal.

However, if Uber started charging drivers a fixed fee, would that avoid having to pay the VAT as the principal, and they'd then just become an agent? Of course, yesterday's ruling seemed to exclude the possibility they could simply be an agent because of the operator rules. So what about the London PH circuits charging drivers a fixed fee? :-o


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
StuartW wrote:
Grandad wrote:
Now as far as I have been told, VAT is already included in hackney fares and must be accounted for if the driver is taking above the VAT threshold. Not many drivers will be doing that as individuals but office bases taking bookings may well have to account for the VAT on all pre bookings.

However, if Uber started charging drivers a fixed fee, would that avoid having to pay the VAT as the principal, and they'd then just become an agent? Of course, yesterday's ruling seemed to exclude the possibility they could simply be an agent because of the operator rules. So what about the London PH circuits charging drivers a fixed fee? :-o

In my view yes.

If Uber didn’t take a cut then they would merely pay VAT on the weekly subs.

Which is one further reason as to why they have now gone down the road of subbing out work to traditional operators.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 757 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group