Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 9:55 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2022 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
On Panorama Monday 11th 20.00pm BBC2

Uber Files: Massive leak reveals how top politicians secretly helped Uber

Thousands of leaked files have exposed how Uber courted top politicians, and how far it went to avoid justice.

They detail the extensive help Uber got from leaders such as Emmanuel Macron and ex-EU commissioner Neelie Kroes.

They also show how the taxi firm's former boss personally ordered the use of a "kill switch" to prevent raiding police from accessing computers.

Uber says its "past behaviour wasn't in line with present values" and it is a "different company" today.

The Uber Files are a trove of more than 124,000 records, including 83,000 emails and 1,000 other files involving conversations, spanning 2013 to 2017.

They were leaked to the Guardian, and shared with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and a number of media organisations including BBC Panorama. They reveal, for the first time, how a $90m-a-year lobbying and public relations effort recruited friendly politicians to help in its campaign to disrupt Europe's taxi industry.

While French taxi drivers staged sometimes violent protests in the streets against Uber, Mr Macron - now president - was on first name terms with Uber's controversial boss Travis Kalanick, and told him he would reform laws in the firm's favour.

Uber's ruthless business methods were widely known, but for the first time the files give a unique inside view of the lengths it went to in achieving its goals.

They show how ex-EU digital commissioner Neelie Kroes, one of Brussels' top officials, was in talks to join Uber before her term ended - and then secretly lobbied for the firm, in potential breach of EU ethics rules.

At the time, Uber was not just one of the world's fastest-growing companies - it was one of the most controversial, dogged by court cases, allegations of sexual harassment, and data breach scandals.

Eventually shareholders had enough, and Travis Kalanick was forced out in 2017.

Uber says his replacement, Dara Khosrowshahi, was "tasked with transforming every aspect of how Uber operates" and has "installed the rigorous controls and compliance necessary to operate as a public company".

'Spectacular' Macron help

Paris was the scene of Uber's first European launch, and it met stiff resistance from the taxi industry, culminating in violent protests in the streets.

In August 2014, an ambitious former banker named Emmanuel Macron had just been appointed minister for the economy. He saw Uber as a source of growth and badly needed new jobs, and was keen to help.

That October, he held a meeting with Mr Kalanick and other executives and lobbyists, which marked the start of a long - but little-publicised - stint as a champion of the controversial firm's interests within government.

Uber lobbyist Mark MacGann described the meeting as "spectacular. Like I've never seen," the files show. "We will dance soon," he added.

"Emmanuel" and "Travis" were soon on first name terms, and met at least four times, the files show - in Paris, and at the World Economic Forum conference in Davos, Switzerland. Only the Davos meeting has been previously reported.

At one point Uber wrote to Mr Macron saying it was "extremely grateful". "The openness and welcome we receive is unusual in government-industry relations."

French taxi drivers were particularly enraged by the 2014 launch of UberPop - a service which allowed unlicensed drivers to offer rides, at much lower prices.

Courts and parliament banned it, but Uber kept the service running as it challenged the law.

Mr Macron didn't think there was a future for UberPop, but he agreed to work with the company to rewrite France's laws governing its other services.

"Uber will provide an outline for a regulatory framework for ridesharing. We will connect our respective teams to start working on a feasible proposal that could become the formal framework in France," an email from Travis Kalanick to Mr Macron reads.

On 25 June 2015, the protests became violent, and a week later Mr Macron texted Mr Kalanick with an apparent offer of help.

"[I] will gather everybody next week to prepare the reform and correct the law."

The same day, Uber announced the suspension of UberPop in France.

Months later Mr Macron signed off on a decree relaxing requirements for licensing Uber drivers.

The extent of the now-president of France's relationship with the controversial global firm that was operating in violation of French law has not been revealed until now.

A spokesperson for Mr Macron said in an email: "His functions naturally led him to meet and interact with many companies engaged in the sharp shift which came out during those years in the service sector, which had to be facilitated by unlocking administrative and regulatory hurdles."

Regulator turned lobbyist

The files also reveal how Uber's relationship with one of Europe's top officials, European Commission vice-president Neelie Kroes, began significantly earlier and ran deeper than previously was known, putting her in an apparent breach of rules governing commissioners' conduct.

They reveal she was in talks to join Uber's advisory board before she even left her last European post in November 2014.

EU rules say commissioners have to respect a "cooling-off" period, then 18 months, during which new jobs require the approval of the commission.

As a commissioner, Ms Kroes oversaw digital and competition policy, and was a high-profile scourge of big tech, playing a leading role in hitting Microsoft and Intel with massive fines.

But of all the companies she could have worked for after leaving, Uber was a particularly controversial choice.

In her home country, the Netherlands, the UberPop ridesharing service had also brought legal and political trouble.

Uber drivers were arrested in October 2014, and that December a judge in the Hague banned UberPop, threatening fines up to 100,000 euros. In March 2015, Uber's Amsterdam office was raided by Dutch police.

Emails say that Ms Kroes called ministers and other members of the government to persuade them to back down during the raid.During another raid a week later, Ms Kroes again contacted a Dutch minister the Uber Files show, and, in the words of an email, "harassed" the head of the Dutch civil service.

An internal email advised staff not to discuss her informal relationship externally: "Her reputation and our ability to negotiate solutions in the Netherlands and elsewhere would suffer from any casual banter inside or outside the office."

The files show that the company wanted Ms Kroes to pass messages on to the office of the Dutch Prime Minister, Mark Rutte.

In October 2015, an email reads: "We'll get backchannel going with Neelie and the PM's Chief of Staff, to extract maximum advantage through 'giving' them the notion of a 'victory'."

She wrote to the commission's Ad Hoc Ethical Committee requesting permission to join Uber's advisory board before the 18 months were up, and appealed to commission president Jean-Claude Juncker.

That permission was denied, but documents show Ms Kroes continued to help the company informally until her appointment was announced, shortly after the cooling-off period had ended.

This underlines that Ms Kroes was in a "clear breach" of the rules, says Alberto Allemanno, Jean Monnet professor of European Union law at HEC Paris.

"You're proving the fact that you're doing something you are not allowed to do," he told BBC Panorama. "Because if she didn't necessarily ask for permission, you might still argue there was a grey area, there was a grey zone. But now it's no longer there."

Looking at all the disclosures about Ms Kroes' relationship with Uber, he said: "It makes me feel that our system is probably not fit for purpose because this situation should have been prevented."

Ms Kroes denies that she had any "formal or informal role at Uber" before May 2016, when the cooling-off period expired.

She said as an EU commissioner she interacted with numerous technology companies, "always driven by what I believe would benefit the public interest".

During the cooling off period, the Dutch government appointed her special envoy for start-ups, which involved interactions with a "wide array of business, government and non-governmental entities" with the aim of promoting a "business-friendly and welcoming ecosystem in the Netherlands", she said.

A spokesperson for the Dutch ministry of economic affairs says that "Uber was not considered a start-up in 2015".

Uber says Ms Kroes left the advisory board in 2018, and says it has since introduced new guidelines "strengthening oversight" of "lobbying and external engagements with policymakers" in Europe.

'Hit kill switch ASAP'

If the police came knocking, Uber had a second line of defence - the "kill switch", which made it impossible for visiting law enforcement to access the company's computers.

This would restrict officers' access to sensitive company data, such as lists of drivers, which the company believed would harm its growth.

The files confirm earlier news reports about the kill switch, and reveal that Mr Kalanick himself activated the system at least once.

"Please hit the kill switch ASAP. Access must be shut down in AMS [Amsterdam]," an email from his account says.

The kill switch was also used in Canada, Belgium, India, Romania and Hungary, and at least three times in France.

Uber says it has had no "'kill switch' designed to thwart regulatory inquiries anywhere in the world" since the new chief executive took over in 2017.

A spokesperson for Mr Kalanick said he never authorised any actions or programmes that would obstruct justice in any country, and any accusation he did is completely false. He said Uber "used tools that protect intellectual property and the privacy of their customers" and that "these fail-safe protocols do not delete any data or information, and were approved by Uber's legal and regulatory departments".

Uber Files

The Uber Files is a leak of 124,000 records including emails and texts exposing conversations and meetings between Uber executives and public officials as the technology-driven taxi firm sought to expand its business. The files were leaked to the Guardian which shared them with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists in Washington DC and media partners in 29 countries, including the BBC's Panorama.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2022 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Guardian's take on it all.

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/j ... i-protests

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2022 6:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I think we all knew this anyway

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2022 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Tuesday 11th July BBC 2 20.00 Panorama special :D

I wonder how this will go down in France :D shame it was too late to affect the presidential election vote :roll:

Even more's the pity proof of what Cameron and Osbourne were up to wasn't included

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2022 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Law Commission Press Release May 2014

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2022 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
The world is rightly appalled by the Uber files – the drivers aren’t so surprised

My union, the IWGB, has been fighting tooth and nail for the rights of Uber drivers. It feels like the only way to trigger change. Alex Marshall is the president of the Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain, and a former courier.

When the trove of confidential files about Uber was published on Sunday evening, the true extent of the tech giant’s ruthless methods was revealed. The leaked documents exposed the mercenary tactics Uber used to lay the groundwork for its empire and to bulldoze its ride-hailing service into cities around the world. From 2014 to 2017, the company duped police, lobbied governments and may have broken laws. One senior Uber executive even told the Guardian the company had a strategy of “weaponising” drivers and exploiting violence against them in order to “keep the controversy burning”.

These revelations may be shocking to anyone who uses Uber. But they were less surprising to Uber drivers. Since the Uber files were published, the company has said that these behaviours are now in the past. In a public statement responding to the Uber papers, Jill Hazelbaker, the company’s senior vice-president of public affairs, wrote that Uber was now a “different company”.

Despite the change of personnel, drivers aren’t overly concerned with who holds what title in the company: they’re more concerned about how to feed their families, pay their bills and keep their jobs.

Uber might argue that its problems have melted away, but this is not the experience of its drivers. For years, the union that I am president of, the Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain (IWGB), has been fighting tooth and nail for the rights of couriers and private hire drivers. Every day, I speak to Uber drivers who believe they have been unfairly deactivated by the platform, have suffered abuse from passengers or have seen their fares decrease. The stories I hear from drivers are almost always the same: Uber tends to side with riders over drivers, while its opaque algorithm means drivers have little power to understand or challenge the decisions the company takes.

In February last year, the UK supreme court ruled that Uber drivers were workers, not independent contractors. It was a breakthrough that forced Uber to reclassify its 70,000 drivers, giving them a guaranteed minimum wage, holiday pay and pension (although this reclassification did not include couriers on the Uber Eats platform). Yet despite this progress, drivers are still experiencing severe problems.

Despite all drivers being paid a guaranteed minimum wage, many have seen their fares decline dramatically. The escalating costs of petrol – together with the overheads of leasing your car and, In London, paying the congestion charge – mean that many Uber drivers are still struggling to break even at the end of the week. There is no transparency over how fares are calculated, and drivers’ pay is not tied to surge pricing, even when riders are paying more than double the standard fare. Uber says, however, that owing to fare increases and additional demand, drivers are earning more than ever.

Another crucial problem drivers struggle with is deactivation – Uber’s neologism for unfair dismissal. Uber says that it takes deactivation seriously and has “robust processes” in place to investigate and review incidents. Members of the IWGB believe Uber is more likely to take the rider’s side in a dispute, and will frequently deactivate drivers without giving a reason. Earlier this year, the IWGB staged a protest against unfair deactivations outside Uber’s London office.

Finally, drivers are still struggling with basic safety issues. A recent survey conducted by the IWGB of drivers who work for a number of platforms including Uber found that more than 50% of our members had experienced physical assault while on the job during their career and more than 80% had experienced verbal abuse in the past year alone. Minicab driving is dangerous work, but Uber and other apps have a responsibility to do much more to support drivers.

In our experience this support has been lacking, and far too often drivers will report concerns about abuse by a passenger only to find nothing has been done. It does not surprise me at all to see the Uber files reveal comments from Uber managers where violence against drivers is treated as unimportant. Uber says it has a “zero tolerance” approach to abuse, and anyone found to behave in this way would face being permanently removed from using the platform.

Last year, Gabriel Bringye, a driver for another ride-hailing platform, Bolt, was stabbed to death while on the job. On the anniversary of his death this year, the IWGB launched the Justice for Gabriel campaign for driver safety. There are easy ways to make private hire driving safer: companies such as Bolt and Uber could change the way they respond to complaints from drivers, and subsidise the cost of CCTV and safety screens for vehicles.

Uber will probably be injecting vast amounts of money into its PR machine in order to claim that everything these recent leaks detail belongs in the past. Owing to the lack of government intervention, change at Uber will come about only through workers getting organised and taking action. Uber still needs a drastic overhaul consisting of three key things: better pay, greater transparency and treating drivers like human beings. There should be a just and transparent process for deactivation, a fair pricing structure that prices fares by the mile, and more measures to ensure the safety of drivers.

Drivers must also have power over their work. This will be achieved only through collective organising. The public have now seen the dirty side of Uber, which workers are all too familiar with. Now it is time to take action and bring about change.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 825 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group