Onzon wrote:
A bit steep all in one go perhaps. Maybe if it were spread over the next couple of fare increases it might be more acceptable.
The 8% figure is roughly comparable to the general inflation figure for the period since the last fare increase, so it's not exhorbitant. The real problem is that there have not been regular yearly fare increases, which would have been much lower. They would also have been much more in line with the anual inflation figures and thus not have attracted so much adverse publicity.
Omitting an anual fare adjustment is false economy and nearly always compounds the problem at the next fare review.

But remember that there were quite hefty rises a few years ago, so maybe costs haven't caught up on that yet?
And it's not that long since a £1 premium was added to late night weekends, on top of the premium already in operation.
And how do you compute the appropriate rise anyway. Is it:
- for someone renting a car/plate at extertionate rates;
- someone who paid £40k for a plate;
- someone who got a plate gratis;
- someone forced to run a WAV rather than a saloon;
- free/paid plate for the WAV, as above;
- someone not relevant to any of the above but forced into the PH market and thus forced to pay an office, and who charges the metered taxi fares.
And doesn't Brighton have a fare formula anway, so why the issue at all?