On the other hand, I found the source of the above articles, which seems to be a series of Tweets on the Derbyshire Dales Police account
Here's the precise words as posted. There's a very subtle difference to the original article at the top of the thread. Anyone notice it?
(This isn't the whole lot - the rest is the reference to the driver, and how to contact police etc etc.)
https://mobile.twitter.com/DDalesPolice ... 4167808000Derbyshire Dales Police wrote:
We have released an image of a man we would like to speak to about an assault in a taxi.
A 29-year-old man who had been on a night out in #Manchester and got a taxi back to his home in the #Ashbourne area reported being assaulted by the taxi driver, a man, after falling asleep in the front passenger seat during his journey home.
The victim got out of the taxi, realising he was close to home, and ran the rest of the way.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the difference is just a couple of words - the Tweet says that the assault took place *in* the taxi.
That wasn't explicitly made clear in the original article. Not sure what others thought of it, but I kind of got the impression that it probably happened outside the taxi and it happened because the punter had decided to run off once he realised he was close to home
So it may in fact be that the assault took place
in the cab, and that was why the punter
then decided to run home. And who would blame him?
But if that was the case, then no clear rationale for the assault, but of course we don't know precisely what went on. It may have even been a sexual thing, which would of course be reasonably predictable if the victim had been a sleeping female
Anyway, that's probably enough speculating for now. And it's maybe a taxi driver thing that the public wouldn't notice, but the original article definitely gave me the impression that the punter had done a runner
