Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 12:07 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 4:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
This isn't very exciting at all, and who'd have thought that the Windsor Advertiser has a tighter paywall than the likes of the Times and Daily Telegraph, and that my normal three, er, avenues for getting round paywalls didn't work 8-[

Got there in the end, though, and while its relevance to the trade is a bit indirect, and it's really more about licensing hours, it's a pet subject of mine and how it interacts with the trade :-o


Discussions over taxi marshalling as Windsor venue seeks to extend opening hours

https://www.maidenhead-advertiser.co.uk ... hours.html

Image
Image: Facebook/Windsor Advertiser

There are no plans for the imminent return of a taxi marshalling system in a popular Windsor nightlife hub despite discussions with officers, a meeting has heard.

The news came during a meeting of the Royal Borough’s licensing sub-committee, in which representatives from The Boom Bar in Goswell Hill sought to extend their Thursday and Sunday opening hours.

In what was a fairly uncontroversial application, the bar sought permission to open until 2.30am on the aforementioned days and bank holidays, with time at the bar called at 2am.

Owner Vik Maharaj explained that the premises would still be closing earlier than some of its neighbours, such as Labyrinth which is open until 3.30am seven days a week.

Craig Hawkings, licensing enforcement officer for the council, told panel members that the sub-committee was required after representations from two residents.

He added that the council would have granted permission for the extension had the representations not been made, and that ‘no responsible authorities’ – such as Thames Valley Police – had objected to the plans.

Mr Maharaj added that himself and Atik were part of Windsor’s NTE (night time economy) meetings, although attendance to these meetings from other parties and neighbours was often very low.

He also sought to address concerns over noise pollution raised in the objections with the speaker system within the bar designed by a sound engineer to ensure as much noise from recorded music stayed within the premises.

Cllr Sayonara Luxton (Con, Sunningdale and Cheapside) questioned over the existence of taxi marshalling.

Although it was once in place on Goswell Hill, this patron dispersal system has not returned since the pandemic.

“The taxi marshalling is something that has been under discussion in our [monthly] pub watch meetings,” Mr Maharaj explained.

“The taxi licensing on Goswell Hill has been discussed many times, and we believe that its Paul Roach (Windsor town manager) who is in charge of it.

“Barry [Smithers, manager at The Boom Bar] has spoken to Paul about four or five times to say that we need to get the taxi marshalling back in place, but we’re not getting any concrete answers as to why it’s not in place.”

Mr Maharaj added that it was ‘so much easier when we can guide people down’ to the taxi drivers with a marshal there to assist.

Cllr Luxton said that she believed the system had worked ‘really well’, but responsibility ultimately lied with the council’s licensing department rather than the town manager.

Chair of the panel, Cllr David Cannon (Con, Datchet, Horton & Wraysbury) added that taxi marshalling was a separate issue from the application, and so it would not be judged against the lack of a marshal.

A decision will be issued to The Boom Bar within five working days.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 4:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18538
Boom Bar owner Vik Maharaj wrote:
“Barry [Smithers, manager at The Boom Bar] has spoken to Paul about four or five times to say that we need to get the taxi marshalling back in place, but we’re not getting any concrete answers as to why it’s not in place.”

Mr Maharaj added that it was ‘so much easier when we can guide people down’ to the taxi drivers with a marshal there to assist.

Wonder why they think a taxi marshall system is such a good idea to 'guide people down'? Nothing to do with people getting too pished, yet they want an extended licence? [-(

Quote:
Chair of the panel, Cllr David Cannon (Con, Datchet, Horton & Wraysbury) added that taxi marshalling was a separate issue from the application, and so it would not be judged against the lack of a marshal.

See above :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Generally taxi marshalls work. The problem is no f***er wants to pay for them.

The answer, and I’m told this would require primary legislation, is for a premium to be put on late night drink sales to cover the costs of those marshalls.

In the grand scale of things taxi marshalls don’t really cost the earth.

I think down here two marshalls, at the two busiest ranks, on a Friday and Saturday for 4 hours each, works out about £25,000 for a year.

Think how much money councils waste and it’s really a pittance.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Doormen are a requirement for a premises to have a late licence therefor cannot understand why a Council cannot make it a condition of licence that the premises contribute to a TAXI Marshall scheme.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 935 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group