Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 4:03 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2024 7:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18531
They like their plying for hire prosecutions at South Oxfordshire Council [-(

And by the standards of some of the stuff like this in the press (and even council news releases), this is quite comprehensively and accurately explained - it even avoids the word 'fine' with regard to the total he's been 'ordered to pay' :-o

And more to come, according to this...


Experienced taxi driver caught offering rides illegally during Henley Regatta

https://www.southoxon.gov.uk/licensing/ ... y-regatta/

19 December 2024

A taxi driver has been ordered to pay more than £2,000 and had six penalty points added to his licence after plying for hire illegally during Henley Regatta.

On Friday 13 December, Muhammad Naeem, of Terryfield Road, High Wycombe, was convicted in his absence after he failed to attend Oxfordshire Magistrates’ Court.

Magistrates heard how, on the evening of 5 July 2024, licensing officers from South Oxfordshire District Council were carrying out checks in Henley-on-Thames when they spotted a grey Toyota Auris, in a prominent location for picking passengers leaving the Regatta, displaying a Buckinghamshire Council licence plate.

A test purchase was carried out, during which the driver, identified as Mr Naeem, agreed to take the undercover officers to Reading for £60 without a prior booking.

Mr Naeem was not licensed by South Oxfordshire District Council, meaning he was not authorised to ply for hire in the district. He was also only licensed with Buckinghamshire Council as a private hire driver and his vehicle was only insured for pre-booked journeys, with his policy specifically excluding public hire.

Having held licences since at least 2017, including previously in South Oxfordshire, Mr Naeem would have been fully aware of the different rules governing private hire and plying for hire. His decision to charge an inflated fare also highlighted his intent for personal gain.

During an interview under caution on 5 August, Mr Naeem admitted to agreeing to the fare and acknowledged his mistake. He confirmed that his actions had invalidated his insurance policy.

Magistrates fined Mr Naeem £660 for illegally plying for hire and other related offences. In addition, his DVLA licence has been endorsed with six penalty points. He has also been ordered to pay £1,092 in costs and a victim surcharge of £260, bringing the total to £2,012 to be paid within 28 days.

Henley Regatta is persistently targeted by unlicensed drivers from outside the area with 17 successfully prosecuted over the last three years. More court hearings are listed to take place over the next few months.

Cllr Georgina Heritage, Cabinet Member for Communities at South Oxfordshire District Council said: “Our primary concern is the safety of the public. Offering taxi rides illegally poses a significant risk as it allows unvetted drivers to pick up passengers in untraceable and often uninsured journeys. These activities undermine the licensing system, compromise safety and deprive legitimate taxi drivers of work. This conviction sends a clear message that illegal taxi operations will not be tolerated in South Oxfordshire.”

For more information about licensing regulations, please visit: southoxon.gov.uk

Notes to editors:

This prosecution was brought by South Oxfordshire District Council under Section 45 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847, Section 143 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, and Section 54 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976.

The district council’s licensing enforcement team works to ensure public safety by regulating taxi services within the district and taking action against illegal operators.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2024 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18531
And, predictably enough, the press rehash uses the inaccurate f-word in the headline (no, not that f-word :p )

To be fair, the opening paragraph does state things more accurately.

And can't be bothered going through it all, but traditionally sub-editors have written the headline rather than the journalist or reporter, but not sure how it works in the days of the online press etc.

But, looking at some of them, I'd be surprised if they're actually proof-read or looked at by a sub-editor at all :lol:


High Wycombe taxi driver fined £2k after Henley Regatta

https://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/2 ... tta-rides/

A High Wycombe taxi driver has been ordered to pay more than £2,000 after plying for hire illegally during Henley Regatta.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2024 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
was convicted in his absence after he failed to attend Oxfordshire Magistrates’ Court.

If I were to give anyone any advice concerning similar matters, it would be that they should always attend court.

It never pays not to attend. [-(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerberus and 581 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group