Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 9:12 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 7:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Chelsea star Sam Kerr cleared of racial harassment

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp9xpv8105jo

Chelsea striker Sam Kerr has been found not guilty of causing racially aggravated harassment, after calling a Metropolitan Police officer "stupid and white".

A jury at Kingston Crown Court cleared her in relation to an incident in Twickenham, south-west London, on 30 January 2023.

Ms Kerr, 31, said she was "antagonised" by officers after she was taken to a police station by a taxi driver following a dispute.

The Australian international, who made the comments to PC Stephen Lovell, did not deny using the words "stupid and white" but denied it amounted to a racial offence.

Ms Kerr was cleared by the jury after it deliberated for four hours.

After the verdict was returned, Ms Kerr gave a thumbs-up to her legal team before leaving the courtroom with her fiancée Kristie Mewis.

Ms Kerr and Ms Mewis had been out drinking when they were driven to Twickenham Police Station by a taxi driver who complained that they had refused to pay clean-up costs after one of them was sick and that one of them had smashed the vehicle's rear window.

Judge Peter Lodder KC said: "I take the view her own behaviour contributed significantly to the bringing of this allegation.

"I don't go behind the jury's verdict but that has a significant bearing on the question of costs."

During the trial, Ms Kerr said she regretted the way she expressed herself but added: "I feel the message was still relevant".

She denied using whiteness as an insult and claimed: "I believed it was him using his power and privilege over me because he was accusing me of being something I'm not.

"I was trying to express that due to the power and privilege they had, they would never have to understand what we had just gone through and the fear we were having for our lives."

It can now be reported that Ms Kerr's legal team attempted to get the case thrown out at a preliminary hearing, arguing there had been an abuse of process by crown prosecutors.

Ms Kerr's lawyer Grace Forbes said the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) had violated its own guidance, adding that a "loophole" in the victims' right of review scheme was used to justify prosecution proceedings a year after the alleged offence.

During the trial, it was put to PC Lovell that he only provided a statement alleging that Ms Kerr's comments had caused "alarm or harassment" after that decision.

In his first statement to the CPS, the officer made no mention of the "stupid and white" comment having an impact on him, the jury was told.

A second statement from PC Lovell was provided in December 2023, mentioning the alleged impact.

He read a section of the statement to the court, which said the comments made him "shocked, upset, and (left) me feeling humiliated".

The charge was authorised later in December 2023, almost a year after the incident.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
yup she got away with it but I do feel this whole thing was a HUGE waste of taxpayers money over something that whilst it shouldn't have been said was minor compared to some stuff you hear about

Did she get away with 'it', or should 'it' have never been brought in the first place? :-k

Was she and her partner a nightmare for the cabby and the police? 100% yes.

However, what she was changed with was racially aggravated harassment. For that change to be successful someone has to be alarmed, harassed, or distressed, with an added racial aspect.

Is there anyone, outside of the MET police and the CPS, who thinks calling a police officer 'white and stupid' has led him to feel alarmed, distressed, or harassed?

The jury didn't, which is all that matters.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
Judge Peter Lodder KC said: "I take the view her own behaviour contributed significantly to the bringing of this allegation.

"I don't go behind the jury's verdict but that has a significant bearing on the question of costs."

Basically, the judge is saying if you act the way you did on the night, evidenced by CCTV and the damage to the cab, you will suffer the financial consequence of paying your legal costs despite winning.

Which could be £50,000 + in my view.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2025 3:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18531
Maybe I'm being a bit mean, but I'll always think of Sam Kerr now when I read any piece about unruly women :-o

This is from Belarus, and the headline speaks for itself.

And, as regards another classic in recent trade history, no doubt if the North Wales coroner had been involved here he would have held the driver responsible for inadequate safeguarding procedures and risk assessment regarding these vulnerable women :lol: :roll:


TAXI TERROR Watch terrifying moment grinning drunk female taxi passenger yanks driver’s wheel sparking horror rollover crash

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/33978150/ ... shes-taxi/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 622 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group