Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri Apr 17, 2026 7:47 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2025 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57306
Location: 1066 Country
Taxi commissioned to take children to special school found with illegal tyre

https://www.stourbridgenews.co.uk/news/ ... ort-taxis/

A TAXI driver who is commissioned to drive children to school has been hit with points on their licence after being caught with an illegal tyre on their vehicle.

Dudley Council undertook a sting operation in conjunction with West Midlands Police and DVSA, checking taxis that are responsible for transporting children to and from special schools across the borough.

Taxis taking children to three special schools in the borough were ordered to go for a spot check at Merry Hill, with council officers, police and compliance officers from DVSA in attendance.

47 drivers and vehicles were checked during the operation on April 3, with the majority found to be compliant with the council’s standards. However, some were found to have not been meeting their contractual obligations on the day, including two vehicles that were found to have bulbs out and another that was not showing the correct licensing sticker.

One driver was also hit with three points on their licence, as their vehicle was found to have an illegal tyre with no tread on the inside and had the corded inner of the tyre showing.

Andy Beaman, a Transport Officer at Dudley Council, said the operation helps to provide peace of mind to parents and carers of children who rely on these services in order for their children to attend school.

He said: “It’s a good message that Dudley puts out that we’re going to up the standards of checking to ensure we can give the best security and safety for the parents of children who need these services.

“We’re looking for any defects on the vehicles that go up and above where we’re contracted to check – our licensing people can do number plate checks, but with the police and the DVSA, they’re operational - they check if there is anyone on their record that they are after who may have slipped the net in terms of driving, and then also check the standards of the vehicles, looking for things like corroded chasses and illegal tyres.

Andy Beaman, a Transport Officer at Dudley Council, said the operation helps to provide peace of mind to parents and carers (Image: Olivia Warburton / NQ) “It adds that extra layer of protection.”

Cllr David Stanley, Cabinet Member for Children’s Services at Dudley Council, said: “Once again, we have shown that our school transport contractors must adhere to the stringent terms of our agreement or risk strong action from our enforcement officers.

“The majority of drivers and vehicles today were found to have the standards required, and I would like to thank them for their patience.”

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18443
Quote:
47 drivers and vehicles were checked during the operation on April 3, with the majority found to be compliant with the council’s standards. However, some were found to have not been meeting their contractual obligations on the day, including two vehicles that were found to have bulbs out and another that was not showing the correct licensing sticker.

So they found nothing, basically, apart from one tyre over 47 vehicles :-o

And some strange phraseology in the article, such as drivers 'commissioned' to take children to school :?

And then there's the misspelling of the word chassis - thought that was maybe the plural of chassis, but as far as I can make out via Google, the plural is the same as the singular :-o :-o

Quote:
...looking for things like corroded chasses and illegal tyres.

So I had a look for the original source to maybe work out where the error came from (because I'm like that :roll: ), but couldn't find anything, so I'd guess there's no press release, or whatever, and that any such release was sent directly to the press rather than on the council's website. And the photos via the press link in Sussex's post credits the photos to the journo, so maybe that indicates it was a joint operation involving the council, police, DVSA and the press :lol:

But the council's website does contain a very similar news release from October last year (which in fact Captain Cab posted on here via a Birmingham Mail rehash), which indicates where the c-word came from. (No, not that c-word 8-[ )

But this maybe indicates why there was a follow up recently, and maybe why the press were involved this time round. And maybe why there wasn't much found this time :-o


Council leads on operation to catch unlawful drivers

https://councilnews.dudley.gov.uk/news/ ... ul-drivers

Dudley borough taxi drivers who have flouted agreements on school transport are facing tough action, following a sting operation led by Dudley Council this week.

The local authority undertook an operation in conjunction with West Midlands Police, DVLA and DVSA on Monday 21 October.

Taxis taking children to a special school in the borough were ordered for a spot check in the area, with council officers, police and compliance officers from DVSA in attendance.

Dudley Council has contracts with a number of providers, who are paid to transport children with additional needs to and from school under a stringent agreement with the authority.

Most of the drivers stopped during the operation were compliant, but some drivers were found to have not been meeting their contractual obligations on the day.

Drivers who were found to not be meeting the requirements included a vehicle with corroded chassis, a vehicle with no working lights on the rear, two illegal number plates, some drivers not having badges with them and one driver with no insurance.

The individuals and companies concerned could now face penalties including loss of contracts, endorsements on their licences, and possibly criminal proceedings.


Councillor David Stanley, cabinet member for children’s services, said:

“Safety of our children and young people is paramount, and our school transport contractors must adhere to the stringent terms of our agreement.

“The majority of drivers and vehicles were found to have the standards expected, and I would like to thank them for their patience.

“Sadly, there were a small number of drivers who were found to be contravening their licence. These individuals will now face the ramifications.”

Jonathan Poole, Centre Manager at Merry Hill, said:

“We are pleased to have supported the council for its vehicle-check, which was hosted at Merry Hill this month.

“These checks are important for continuously ensuring services across the community operate safely, and that vulnerable children and adults across Dudley are protected."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2025 4:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18443
A few months ago, Dudley Council wrote:
Drivers who were found to not be meeting the requirements included a vehicle with corroded chassis, a vehicle with no working lights on the rear, two illegal number plates, some drivers not having badges with them and one driver with no insurance.

Which explains why they were looking for corroded 'chasses' six months on :-o

But you wonder what kind of formal inspections the vehicle had been through such that a routine stop check later managed to find a corroded chassis :?

But it at least explains the unusual rationale for stopchecks - they're looking for vehicles with corroded chassis. Are they really expecting to find many in future :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18443
Well the official council 'media release' has appeared a couple of days after the press article.

And the quote including the word chassis/chasses isn't included in the official release, so the plot thickens :-o

But it looks like the mystery of where the misspelt 'chasses' came into being will never be solved :lol:

https://councilnews.dudley.gov.uk/news/ ... -providers

There's another wee detail that wasn't included in the press article last week:

Dudley Council wrote:
Two vehicles were found to have bulbs out, and work was done to correct this during the inspection, and another vehicle was not showing the correct licencing sticker.

So if the bulbs were actually sorted out at the time, then out of 47 cars all they found was one tyre and a sticker issue...

And the Birmingham Mail's rehash has used the word 'defunct' to describe the bulbs. Quite an unusual use of the word 'defunct', I'd say :-o

Also this new bit:

Councillor David Stanley, cabinet member for children’s services wrote:
"I would also like to thank the owners for Merry Hill for allowing us to utilise one of their car parks for this important operation.”

Which is pretty unremarkable, obviously. But check out this from last year's release, which is with hindsight maybe looks a bit odd:

Last year, an official Dudley Council news release wrote:
Jonathan Poole, Centre Manager at Merry Hill, said:

“We are pleased to have supported the council for its vehicle-check, which was hosted at Merry Hill this month.

“These checks are important for continuously ensuring services across the community operate safely, and that vulnerable children and adults across Dudley are protected."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is the council here getting the manager of a shopping centre to make safety-is-paramount style statements to the press after a taxi spotcheck? :-s

Anyway, I really should stop reading stuff like this :lol: :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2025 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57306
Location: 1066 Country
So two vehicles had bulbs out and were sorted when it was pointed out to the driver.

I just wish councils would say they were delighted that the only problem on these vehicles was blown bulbs, which happens to 10s of 1000s of vehicles every week.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2025 7:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18443
Sussex wrote:
I just wish councils would say they were delighted that the only problem on these vehicles was blown bulbs, which happens to 10s of 1000s of vehicles every week.

Maybe the council were just gutted they didn't find any rotten 'chasses' :lol:

(I think the press swapped the word 'corroded' with 'rotten' :? )


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 561 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group