Taxi Driver Online

Wolverhampton has to 'carry the weight of a national free-for-all': Councillor demands big changes to taxi laws

https://www.expressandstar.com/news/loc ... taxi-laws/

Wolverhampton Council's taxi licensing department is carrying the weight of failings across the rest of the country, say Tory councillors in the city.

Councillor Simon Bennett, leader of Wolverhampton's Conservative opposition group, said the city was paying the price for a 'national free for all' when it came to issuing taxi licences.

In July the parliamentary transport committee announced an investigation into how standards for taxis and private hire vehicles could be improved, amid concern about inadequate regulation that varies from one area of the country to another.

Councillor Bennett said 96 per cent of taxi licences issued in Wolverhampton were for drivers who were outside of the area.

This was because the system was much more efficient in Wolverhampton than elsewhere, he said, but added that it made it near-impossible to enforce the conditions on licenses elsewhere in the country.

Councillor Bennett said Wolverhampton was one of the first authorities in the country to introduce a fully digital licensing system, introduce daily DBS checks and cut unnecessary red tape.

"That innovation showed how modern, transparent regulation could work – but the national framework it operates within is now unsustainable.

"Ninety-six per cent of Wolverhampton licences go to drivers who live elsewhere, and the law gives councils little power to refuse or enforce standards beyond their borders.”

Councillor Bennett said this was no criticism of the council, but about fixing a national system that no longer made sense.

"Wolverhampton’s success in streamlining licensing has inadvertently exposed weaknesses in cross-border enforcement, allowing vehicles licensed in one area to operate almost anywhere with minimal oversight," he said.

Councillor Bennett said Baroness Casey’s review into group-based child sexual exploitation highlighted serious safeguarding failures, including inconsistent data collection on suspects and patchy oversight of drivers in some areas.

"She called for tougher, consistent standards for taxi and private-hire licensing to protect vulnerable passengers, recommendations that mirror concerns long raised by Wolverhampton Conservatives," he said.

“Where the council has innovated, it has shown what can be achieved, but no single authority can carry the weight of a licensing system that has become a national free-for-all.

"The transport committee must deliver clear safety standards, proper enforcement powers and a framework that protects passengers and responsible drivers alike.”

_________________
IDFIMH

Where to start with all that?

Well, in short, the opposition are trying to deflect blame because they didn't, er, oppose.

As usual, they're saying that the council was entirely passive in all of it, and could have done absolutely nothing to stop the whole empire building up.

I mean, for a start a council official said about a year ago that they were trying to 'throttle back' applications from elsewhere, which in itself acknowledges that the council didn't have to just sit back and do nothing while numbers built up.

And it's consistent with the messaging when the council moved from braggadocio mode c. 2016 to being a bit more defensive c. 2022, and claiming that they did absolutely nothing to encourage applications from elsewhere

So the Tories here trying to take the moral high ground as the opposition in Wolverhampton, while blaming it all on external factors because they said nothing at the time when they could have

They're just as much to blame as the rest of them, so it's a bit rich to try to now try to harvest political capital from it all.

Anyway, just politics as usual, so nothing to see here really

I wonder how many times those Tory councillors wrote to the Tory government between 2010 and 2024 lobbying for change?

I suspect the answer is sweet f*** all.

_________________
IDFIMH

Still can't believe this pish

I mean, how does the law give councils little power to "enforce standards beyond their own borders"?

What can Wolverhampton LOs do in Wolverhampton with regard to Wolverhampton-plated cars that they can't do in Manchester or Leeds, say?

The fact is that to enforce things properly from such a distance and with such numbers of licences issued requires an enforcement budget to match. So if the Tories are now claiming that they couldn't enforce properly from afar then that simply means they can't afford to.

Which maybe has something to do with constantly reducing licensing fees to rock-bottom levels?

I don't know, if they're now worried about how problematic the whole thing is then maybe it was due to minimal oversight by politicians in Wolverhampton?

But, of course, even the opposition in the city are portraying the whole thing as a success, and all the fault lies elsewhere

It is the fault of whoever runs wolverhapton licensing nobody else !

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector

In my view the blame lies fairly and squarely at the feet of the councillors.

Their utter ignorance of what they have allowed to be created is astounding.

_________________
IDFIMH

Perhaps they do know and it was all done under the delegated authority syndrome where no one accepts responsibility,councillors or officials.

'Delegated authority syndrome' - nice one, Heathcote

Not sure if they still don't get it, or they're just trying to cover it all up, basically, and deflect the blame - nothing to do with us; blame the legislation

But there's echoes of the whole grooming gang stuff - nodding dogs who just go with the flow, for a quiet life, and for their own self-interest, and also for their own reputation and that of the council generally.

So there's probably an element among Woverhampton councilllors who still don't get it, and also a whole damage limitation exercise going on for when the brown stuff hits the extractor device