Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 2:17 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2026 5:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 18523
Why do cases like this even get to committee - he didn't even turn up, presumably because he knew he was a basket case? :?


Taxi licence bid blocked after assault, drugs and drink‑drive offences cited

https://news.stv.tv/east-central/taxi-l ... ions-cited

A committee heard Thomas Duncan also had a drink-driving conviction – with members deciding he was not 'a fit and proper person' to drive a taxi.

A taxi licence bid has been blocked after councillors heard the applicant had been involved in assault, drug and drink‑driving offences.

Thomas Duncan’s request had to be considered by Fife Council’s regulations and licensing committee because Police Scotland had lodged a representation.

He did not appear at the hearing and his criminal record counted against him – he also had a drink-driving conviction – with members deciding he was not “a fit and proper person” to drive a taxi.

Sergeant Neil Ewing, of Police Scotland, told the committee: “There are three separate offences here.

“The first one being a type of domestic assault where he assaulted his ex-partner’s new boyfriend and was found guilty.

“The second offence was misuse of drugs where he has been found in a vehicle with some herbal cannabis.

“They had then done a search of his home address where they found a mobile phone, scales and cash and he was found guilty at Edinburgh Sheriff Court in 2018 for supply of a controlled drug.

“The last offence is a vehicle collision that took place in Windygates in 2022.”

Sgt Ewing said Duncan was found to be around three and a half times over the legal limit with a reading of 77 microgrammes of alcohol in 100ml of breath.

The legal limit is 22 microgrammes of alcohol in 100ml of breath.

He added: “As a result of the road, drugs and assault offences, we do not believe is he a fit and proper person.”

Councillor Lea McLelland moved that the application be refused.

“He is not a fit and proper person,” she said. “I agree with the police.”

The committee unanimously agreed that the licence application be turned down.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2026 5:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
Why do cases like this even get to committee

The fella was a chancer, and as he has (I assume) paid his fee, he wanted the council to earn it.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 147 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group