Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Sep 09, 2026 1:02 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 26, 2026 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57883
Location: 1066 Country
London rollout of robotaxis delayed amid lack of guidance for firms to follow

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... uber-wayve

The rollout of robotaxis on the streets of London is unlikely to happen this year, as regulatory and technical hurdles push back the ambitious schedule set out by the UK government.

Only weeks ago Uber and London-based Wayve were granted the first minicab licences in the capital to allow them to offer self-driving taxi rides to paying customers – but with a human safety driver in place, for now – and said they would start trips “later this summer” before a full public launch.

In 2025, Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, accelerated the proposed timeline for commercial trials of fully driverless taxi services by a year, announcing that they would start in the spring of this year.

However, progress has slowed in recent months and Transport for London (TfL) has still not published the guidance that companies wanting to offer services must follow to win its approval.

Last month, Christina Calderato, TfL’s director of strategy, told the London assembly’s transport committee that the transit authority would not be in a position to start accepting applications “for some time”.

She said: “I do not think we are in a rush to get [the guidelines] out. There is a huge amount of work going on behind the scenes.”

Uber and Wayve have said that more than 100,000 Londoners were on their waiting list for self-driving taxis.

They are racing against Google-owned Waymo and its Chinese equivalent, Baidu’s Apollo Go, to launch self-driving taxi services in London. Robotaxis are now available to hire in more than 20 cities across the US, China and the Middle East.

Earlier this month Zagreb became the first European city to offer autonomous rides to the general public, through Uber, but the service still has a human driver for “onboard monitoring”.

On Tuesday, Waymo announced that it plans to launch commercial operations in Munich, Germany, late next year.

Ben Loewenstein, Waymo’s head of policy and government affairs for the UK and Europe, told the Financial Times that the company was currently “working through the safety approval process” with the transport department and was waiting on TfL’s guidance to gain consent.

He added that Waymo was working towards launching a fully autonomous service “by the end of this year” but would not say whether the company would be able to offer paid rides to the general public in that timeframe.

TfL has granted 15 private hire vehicle licences to Ford Mustang Mach-E vehicles equipped with Wayve’s artificial intelligence driving software, as well as surround cameras and radar.

A TfL-licensed private hire driver will sit in the driver’s seat during trips to intervene if necessary, although the software is expected to control the car.

Uber and Wayve plan to launch small-scale commercial pilots with a driver behind the wheel soon.

For its fully driverless launch Wayve plans to switch to a new Nissan Leaf vehicle that is still in production and is due to launch later this year.

Alex Kendall, Wayve’s chief executive, said the company never claimed it would have a fully driverless operation this year.

“I don’t want to put a timeline on it because we want to make sure we pass through [the regulatory process],” he told the FT. “This work is continuing at pace. London is a significant step up in complexity compared to Phoenix or San Francisco.”

Baidu only began testing vehicles in London at the end of last month and has said it plans to launch public rides next year.

Operating taxis without a driver requires approval via a new process, known as an automated passenger services permit, with the government’s Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency. So far, no vehicles have been approved by the DVSA.

TfL was contacted for comment.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2026 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 21072
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
technical issues...


... they've realised they don't work :lol:

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2026 7:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57883
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
technical issues...


... they've realised they don't work :lol:

They work, albeit with a pilot; they just aren't safe.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 28, 2026 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57883
Location: 1066 Country
Launch of fully driverless taxis in London is delayed – here’s why

https://www.independent.co.uk/bulletin/ ... 40976.html

• The introduction of fully driverless taxis in London is facing delays beyond initial 2026 targets due to regulatory hurdles.

• Transport for London confirmed that no operators have yet completed vehicle registrations or submitted permit applications to the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency.

• The Department for Transport indicated that the full regulatory framework to introduce self-driving cars is currently being developed for 2027.

• Transport for London stated that its operational guidance will be published shortly, though no specific release date has been confirmed.
Uber and vehicle partner Wayve plan an interim small-scale pilot offering self-driving taxi rides with a human safety driver behind the wheel.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2026 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57883
Location: 1066 Country
I think the fella makes some good points.

Driverless Uber taxis a 'gimmick' that is doomed to failure, cabbie boss claims

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/d ... n-37623738

Uber’s self-driving taxis that have hit UK roads for the first time will vanish within a few years because Brits will soon tire of the 'gimmick', a leading cabbies organisation has said.

Steve McNamara, the general secretary of the Licensed Taxi Drivers' Association, says London's roads are just too clogged for the Waymo robot cars to operate effectively because of a safety design that sees the vehicles remain stationary at junctions, often for minutes at a time.

A batch of the taxi-hailing app's fleet started taking paying customers in the capital for the first time last Thursday - even though a human will still sit behind the wheel until the green light is given for them to operate totally autonomously.

The futuristic cars use AI to analyse data about what is happening, meaning the artificial intelligence packed kit can make decisions in real time. But while fears are growing for the taxi trade, the boss of the association claimed that the new vehicle's deadheading - travelling between serving passengers - is cause for concern.

Mr McNamara told the Mirror that the LTDA, the voice of London's black cab drivers for more than fifty years, is not overly worried by today's arrival, despite the AI driver officially entering service.

He said: "It's hype and it's spin, it's clever marketing but that's all it is. It’s a novelty, a gimmick at best. Driverless cars are the solution that we don’t need. Who actually requires one? It'll be a bit of fun for some then that's it.

"They're not even driverless [yet] and may not be for a long time. When you get in one, the safety operator is told not to speak to you. They want to give you a dystopian experience.

"This is not about driverless cabs, it’s about the software they are creating that they want to go on to sell to other countries after testing it in this environment."

Pin-pointing the problems Uber and other firms face, he went on: "There's a number of big issues. New York tried them and they're now banned - not because of safety, but because of deadheading. They'll do the same here. You can't just have empty cars cruising the street for hours on end.

"When a cabbie hasn't got a fare, they are usually at a rank or parked up or at home in bed. London will not tolerate thousands of cars just moving for no reason. What do they do with no fares? Aimlessly run? And that's just one of the issues.

"Another problem they can't get around are the road junctions. These cars are cautious by nature. They cannot move from a junction if another car is anywhere near - it'll be there until Christmas on our roads! We are currently the fifth most congested city on the planet, and we have big ambitions to be number one. London is just too busy for this idea to work."

Mr McNamara added that, longer term, Brits simply won't buy into cabs with no driver unless they are making a big saving.

He said: "There’s no money in it. The car is three times the price to start with, they aren't employing drivers so who maintains them? Where are they stored?

"It is all about the mighty dollar and the money they do make going back to America I’m afraid. The Mayor [Sadiq Khan] is watching it very closely, he is no fool. Senior people at TFL are also watching it like hawks - even though we’ve never agreed on anything, we seem to agree on this.

"But the bottom line is that once the hype stops, who will need one? Last week, one of our drivers found three iPhones in his cab and drove around all day with them. Who would get that person's property back to them?

"Who will help people with their suitcases? Or elderly people, or those with bad backs? It's like the cycle lanes - it works for the fit, the rest can sod off. We're supposed to be an inclusive society"

Waymo, part of tech giant Google, claims its technology dramatically cuts traffic accidents and even prevents pedestrian and cyclist injuries.

But many campaigners are not convinced and the firm were forced to pause its self-driving car service in five areas earlier this year after a software issue saw some vehicles get stuck down flooded roads.

David McMullen, GMB union's Senior Organiser, has urged caution over the arrival and isn't so certain the threat to jobs is minimal.

"With hundreds of thousands of people employed to drive every day, we need to be really careful with the roll out of driverless cars unless we are prepared to see unprecedented levels of social and economic disruption," he said in a statement.

"GMB has called on TFL and the Government to urgently take responsibility for developing a plan that protects drivers and holds operators accountable for the disruption that these services will ultimately cause.

"Until a plan is put in place to manage this transition and support drivers, it is premature to move to 'driverless' services. It’s vital that we consider the implications of this before it’s too late.”

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2026 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 6:33 am
Posts: 19241
Quote:
"When a cabbie hasn't got a fare, they are usually at a rank or parked up or at home in bed. London will not tolerate thousands of cars just moving for no reason. What do they do with no fares? Aimlessly run? And that's just one of the issues."

Is this the 'deadheading' thing? Why can't the cars just park up between jobs until another is allocated? You know, like bog standard PHVs? :-s

Quote:
"Who will help people with their suitcases? Or elderly people, or those with bad backs? It's like the cycle lanes - it works for the fit, the rest can sod off. We're supposed to be an inclusive society"

Fair point - but maybe that's the thing - if it all does take off then the Uber punters etc will lap them up, while we'll be left with the mega-suitcases and hospital runs etc :roll:

Reminds me of stuff locally, where there are subsidised buses running here, there, and everywhere compared to back in the day :x

So often the only people getting taxis from the station are those with three tons of suitcases :roll:

Or people arrive on the new airport coach at the bus station and you have to take their three ton of suitcases a few hundred yards as opposed to a run from the airport :roll:

Anyway, more broadly I can see why the trade is sceptical and say it's gimmicky. But, of course, the problem is that all the shortcomings will probably be ironed out in time, or at least alleviated. I mean, who'd have guessed twenty years ago that it would even get to this stage? :-o

And the powers-that-be won't be at all bothered about the loss of jobs in the trade - good riddance, a lot of them will say :-|


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2026 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57883
Location: 1066 Country
Quote:
Is this the 'deadheading' thing? Why can't the cars just park up between jobs until another is allocated? You know, like bog standard PHVs? :-s

There is nowhere to park in London, which clearly also applies to manned PHVs, but those men can see traffic wardens and move when they approach.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 881 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group