RealCabforce wrote:
chipper wrote:
i see that they are getting worked up on the old fastblacks site over this issue.
And quite right too!!! We all know there is no such thing as a private hire taxi - it is a contradiction in terms.
Coutts is a stupid asshole if he doesn't realise there is a difference between
TAXIS and private hire
CARS. It's just another publicity stunt to get his failing business in the paper.
PH never were were meant to be kid-on taxis - they were meant to be a chauffeur drive service. In Scotland, at least, they only grew through exploiting a loophole in the civic code when it replaced the original burgh police act.
If they are not booked for illegally using the "Greenways" then watch the fireworks that will follow!!!!!
Story goes that Paul Ferris is less than impressed. He's trying to keep a low profile and Coutts is doing this. Crazy.
as you may know the local rag always miss quotes things when they go to print wont be the first or the last time thats for sure.
i had a friend who contacted them with information on a stroy they were running (not to do with this issue) and they never printed all the facts he had given them only the bits that they wanted so the readers never got the true facts. papers always print what they think will make a good head line.
i have never said that iam a TAXI but why should joe public pay extra on there fare? and its fact that Joe public see PH as another form of taxi and you cant blame the PH driver for that. i dont tell anyone that iam a taxi as iam not one but a lot of people think we are.
why then do PH do "TAXI CARD" jobs ????? why do we work off TAXI metered fares???? ask CEC for the answers to that one please.
all i want is to get my passanger from A to B asap and if we had greenways acess life we be a wee bit more simple nothing wrong with that is there.