NTA wrote:
The Association believes that there is a burden now being placed on local authorities to delimit. That is not in accordance with the statement made by Mr Rupert Cope of the Department for Transport following the OFT report...
I can't remember that one
Quote:
...nor paragraph 5 of the Government's Response to the OFT report dated 18th March 2004.
Of course, no mention of para 4 which said:
The Government is therefore stronly encouraging all those local authorities who still maintain quantity restrictions to remove restrictions as soon as possible.Quote:
A recent statement by his successor is placing a burden that was not originally imposed.
The only incosistency subsequent to the Govt's response has been when statements have been made there are a bit less hawkish than the response itself, so I don't think the NTA should be complaining.
Quote:
Local authorities ought to have sole discretion although they should of course justify themselves. The Association believes that surveys are just as important in deciding whether to issue licences as they are in deciding whether not to issue licences.
So that's a brief statment of the applicable law, so why make it sound like something else?
Quote:
The premiums that are said to change hands do of coursereflect a goodwill element often e.g. membership of a radio circuit.
Slight contradiction - one minute they are just 'said' to change hands, but then they become a bit more concrete.
OK, membership positions in radio circuits may be traded, but who has ever mentioned them and who has a problem with them? To equate this with plate premiums is to mislead.
Quote:
They do show a commitment to the trade and heighten standards.
They certainly show a financial committment, but this can just as well exist alongside an endless treadmill of part-time/'between jobs' drivers.
As for standards, what about places like Blackpool? Or the watering down of standards to facilitate the treadmill mentioned above?
Quote:
The question of course is not whether a premium is paid but whether there are sufficient taxis to meet public demand.
A premium reflects excess profits, which means they are coming out of someone's pocket, so isn't that a question that should be addressed as well?
Quote:
The premium is essentially irrelevant.
So NTA members in restricted areas are selling plates for Jack?
Quote:
The Association strongly disagrees with the proposition that peaked demand should be looked at very seriously when looking at numbers. It is rather like saying that a department store, which brings in Christmas staff ought to keep the same staff all year round
So the NTA thinks that government should allow market forces to dictate shop staff numbers, but not as regards the taxi trade. I wonder why that is?
I love it when analogies like this are used, because quite often it just underlines the hypocrisy of those drawing them.
