alan G wrote:
As expected, when exposed as a liar, you change your tune and claim that your remark was "tongue in cheek." It is a tactic you use extensively when caught out. Be a man and admit you lied deliberately.
I can see you are void of humour Mr Gladstone, which does not surprise me in the least? Has it ever occurred to you of what I said prior to stating
"I had taken the comments on the issue of the E7 from your website with your kind permission". If you read the beginning of the post which I am sure you did you will notice that the very first thing I said was this....
I'll let others decide on your interference in choice by publishing here what you wrote on your website, if that's all right with you? You will notice I had already decided to publish the Text regardless of what your opinion was? However, my final parting shot was one of contempt and I can see it served its purpose.
"Mr Gladstones comments on the issue of the E7 taken from his website with his kind permission".
"Mr Gladstones comments on the issue of the E7 taken from his website with his kind permission".
"Mr Gladstones comments on the issue of the E7 taken from his website with his kind permission".
"Mr Gladstones comments on the issue of the E7 taken from his website with his kind permission". Both you and I and the rest of the world, know that I didn't have your permission but likewise both you and I and the rest of the world also know that I don't need your permission? So why would I ask for it in the first place? If you can't see the irony in the statement then your brain is smaller than many of us contemplate? Perhaps we should run a one-day seminar on how to spot a liar? We could invite you as our guinea Pig and perhaps use this particular statement which miraculously found its way on to your website without anyone putting it there or admitting to having written it? The only thing we know is that you the website administrator totally agree with its content.
I don't know if I was wrong in stating you had written it but I'm pleased you put the record straight by informing us you didn't? You can rest assured we are all a little wiser now? lol
Quote:
Always a problem for liars is remembering what they said. So, read the 2 quotes and tell us, was your remark "tongue in cheek", "sarcastic", or just a lie?
Oh my remark was most definitely a sarcastic comment to you and perhaps tongue in cheek to others? However we both know that I hadn't asked your permission and nor did I need to?
Quote:
Despite being told that I did not pen the item in question, you ignore that fact.
There is no name on the comment so why would anyone assume you didn't write it? Maybe you did write it and wish to disassociate yourself from the comment?
Perhaps you can answer the question why you allowed someone to use the following terminology without submitting a name or Nome de plume? A reference is made to. "I" but who is I? Is it you, or is it someone else who is obsessed with the 25 ft Turning circle?
I and some colleagues have been canvassing opinion on the ranks for some time and now would like to hear your views. Fastblacks does not believe that a satisfactory case has been offered to admit these vehicles and retention of the tight turning circle is vital. However, to complete our information, please feel free to send us your views on this using our online form here…..admin@fastblacks.com.
One might assume that by stating, "Fastblacks does not believe that a satisfactory case has been offered to admit these vehicles" that whoever wrote this comment is speaking on behalf of Fastblacks? I and everyone else are under the impression that the only person who is privileged to speak on behalf of Fastblacks is Mr Alan Gladstone, which for all intents and purposes is YOU?
Now you're inferring that the nameless person or persons who wrote this comment are speaking on behalf of Fastblacks? People on here and elsewhere are going to find it hard to believe that this comment, which advocates retaining the 25ft turning circle, is not stained with your grubby hands. Another aspect of the comment is that whoever wrote it suggests all views on the subject should be sent to you?
Admin@fastblacks.com
I originally assumed you wrote all the comment on that page but you said you didn't? Maybe you can tell us who did write it and who this "I" person is and why all comments are addressed to you and why this person is speaking on behalf of Fastblacks?
JD