Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 2:19 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:07 am
Posts: 74
Location: edinburgh
greenbadgecabby wrote:
JD wrote:
greenbadgecabby wrote:
I'm consulting with my chair on that. :wink:


Your a big fan of the local London trade mag GB, when they write an editorial on the recent Edinburgh decision why don't you ask them to push the PCO and Livingstone to only license vehicles that have ABS? It is quite obvious why the PCO and Livingstone aren't concerned about LTI vehicles not having ABS, but don't you think you lot in London should be highlighting this safety feature?

Regards

JD


I gather it will be mentioned in the next edition of 'Taxi'

Theres a fundamental flaw in that idea.

Livingstone would probably agree, given it would be highlighted as a safety issue.

The new TX3 due out in the Autum is apparantly fitted with ABS, the next thing we would get is an instruction for all current Taxis to have the new equipment retro fitted at great cost.

I think he's made it clear he did'nt want the alternatives in London, Allied seem to have gone very quiet on the legal front to challenge the PCO's decision to retain the monopoly by LTI.

Edinburghs done well to make such a quick decision, and who knows in a couple of years we may get an alternative.


Do you think "lti" will make a challenge in Edinburgh? They have in most other area's in the past 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 6:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
greenbadgecabby wrote:
JD wrote:
greenbadgecabby wrote:
I'm consulting with my chair on that. :wink:


Your a big fan of the local London trade mag GB, when they write an editorial on the recent Edinburgh decision why don't you ask them to push the PCO and Livingstone to only license vehicles that have ABS? It is quite obvious why the PCO and Livingstone aren't concerned about LTI vehicles not having ABS, but don't you think you lot in London should be highlighting this safety feature?

Regards

JD


I gather it will be mentioned in the next edition of 'Taxi'

Theres a fundamental flaw in that idea.

Livingstone would probably agree, given it would be highlighted as a safety issue.

The new TX3 due out in the Autum is apparantly fitted with ABS, the next thing we would get is an instruction for all current Taxis to have the new equipment retro fitted at great cost.


I was under the impression ABS can't be fitted to the old cabs and In order to get ABS on the new vehicle they had to make some major changes. Perhaps someone can enlighten as to what changes were made?

Once LTI vehicles have ABS I wouldn't mind betting it will soon become part of the COF.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 6:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
jackcab wrote:


Do you think "lti" will make a challenge in Edinburgh? They have in most other area's in the past 8)


LTI will only challenge a decision when they believe the decision was reached without proper consultation, as was the case in Leicester. Edinburgh went about it the right way and there is nothing that a court of law would find unreasonable in this decision. Leicester are now doing things right and they also will probably reach the same conclusion as Edinburgh.

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/unions/s ... 06,00.html

Leaked GMB report makes bribery claims



An internal investigation by the GMB, the country's fourth biggest trade union has accused supporters of its former general secretary and his present deputy of alleged criminal acts, a £150,000 " bribe" to a rival candidate to stand down and massive breaches of union rules on campaigning.

The report, a copy of which has been seen by the Guardian, concentrates on allegations against campaigns run for Kevin Curran, the former general secretary, and the current deputy general secretary, Debbie Coulter, who chaired last October's Labour party conference.

Mr Curran described the whole inquiry as a kangaroo court and his solicitor was considering legal action. Debbie Coulter declined to comment.
There is no investigation into their defeated rival, Paul Kenny, now acting general secretary, who told the investigators that none of the people supporting him had done any campaigning at all.

No witnesses came forward with any evidence against Mr Kenny.

Among the extraordinary allegations in the report are a claim by rival candidate, Phil Davies, that he was offered, via a third party, a £150,000 severance package from Mr Curran to withdraw his candidacy against Ms Coulter.

Mr Curran yesterday described the claim as "a fabrication".

Other allegations include the use of £300 of stamps to send out election addresses, and of false accounting by hiding election material in a union magazine print order.

The report says unknown people broke the Data Protection Act by getting access to members addresses so they could be canvassed.

No criminal action is being taken.

The report accuses a Newcastle firm of solicitors of mounting a " phone bank" operation to cold call members, stuffing thousands of envelopes and paying for election addresses.

They also discovered a pro-Curran website, a " Friends of Curran" bank account with unknown sums of money donated by MPs and a local employer and a " Friends of Curran and Coulter" organisation operating out of a PO Box address in Brighton.

The report alleged that altogether some 50,000 to 60,000 election leaflets were issued in Lancashire, the north east and Scotland, and lists staff and members who admitted helping Mr Curran.

It says they even seconded a TUC member of staff from the north east to work for him.

All these acts are against the present union rules, which forbid campaigning, sending out election material or using union money to fund campaigns.

The report dismisses serious claims - highlighted in the press - that Mr Curran was involved in ballot-rigging or tried to pervert the course of justice in a tribunal case.

The investigation panel was chaired by Phil King, a lawyer with Thompsons', the union's solicitors.

Mr Curran, on advice from his solicitor, Louise Christian, declined to appear before them until they put the allegations to him. He has not been sent the report.

He told the Guardian: " It was a kangaroo court. Everything that was done by my supporters was done by Mr Kenny's supporters by the bucketful.

"I have boxes of material showing that Mr Kenny did similar things and members of the union know this happened but they never came forward.

"For the very first day I was elected and started to sort out the union's finances and change the way it was run they were determined to get me."

Ms Christian said last night that Mr Curran was considering legal action. " This investigation was not impartial, it was one-sided."

She added that the union appeared to have misled Mr Curran in a letter sent on February 27.

The letter, also on the website, says: "The report makes no finding against your client.. there is no intention to provide any information to the press."

Mr King said yesterday: " It was not a kangaroo court. It was a thorough investigation to look at the situation and make recommendations on any rule changes needed for future elections and we did sent information to Mr Curran for comments.

"We have not sent the report to anybody, we reported back to the union."

Read the GMB lawyer's letter to Kevin Curran (part 1)
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/unions/i ... 81,00.html

Read the GMB lawyer's letter to Kevin Curran (part 2)
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/unions/i ... 91,00.html

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Arrogance that brought downfall of union's high flyer

UNION PERKS: Robert Parker's £150,000 home with his Mercedes in the drive, a union van parked outside his house


HEADQUARTERS: the GMB building in Glasgow


BLACK AND WHITE: a financial statement revealing the union money Mr Parker used to fund the purchase of football tickets and his Mercedes

Robert Parker, Scottish boss of the GMB trade union, has quit. Chief Reporter DAVID LEASK looks at some reasons why he had to go

HE was the darling of Scotland's trade union movement.

Tough-talking and fiercely proud of his modest roots, he was feted by the nation's Labour leaders, new and old.

He enjoyed all the trappings of success – the salary, home and car of a top business executive.

But Robert Parker, the youngest-ever Scottish regional secretary of the GMB, was today accused by his own colleagues of breaking the trust put in him by thousands of the UK's worst-paid workers.

He has already been branded a bully and a sex pest by two women in an ongoing saga of employment tribunals.

And now union insiders have damned him as a bully boss who has brought the whole movement into disrepute.

Despite almost £250,000 being found for the best lawyer to defend him at his tribunals, Mr Parker couldn't spare union cash to hire a legal team to fight for 900 axed workers at Daks Simpson's Lanarkshire plant.

Mr Parker, 44, has always denied allegations made against him – whether inside or outside Glasgow's employment tribunal office.

He was "shocked and disgusted" by claims he pestered his personal assistant, Margaret McAvoy, now 37, for sex.

He tried to rubbish a subsequent claim by another employee, Mary Senior, that he victimised her after she agreed to stand up for Mrs McAvoy in an internal inquiry.

But insiders believe the two tribunals, along with others against the GMB nationally in recent years, reveal a dangerous rot at the heart of Britain's second-biggest union.

GMB bosses have now vowed to review policies on bullying and harassment in the workplace.

But an investigation by the Evening Times reveals Mr Parker has more than the bullying claims to worry about.

Financial documents obtained by the Evening Times show Mr Parker used his own union's contingency fund to help finance his lifestyle.

He borrowed £16,100 from the fund, usually used for charity donations and incidental costs, in May 2002 to pay for a used Mercedes bought from a garage in East Kilbride.

The withdrawal – which insiders said Mr Parker regarded as an interest-free loan and one of the perks of his job – was against union rules.

Mr Parker had already received £7500 towards a new car from the union, which had changed its rules to give bosses a cash allowance instead of free company cars.

But he needed the extra cash after trading his trademark union-owned jeep – with the private plate M9 GMB – at the town's Milton Motors.

Senior union sources today confirmed the cash was borrowed in clear breach of rules.

Mr Parker's predecessor, Robert Thomson, said: "It would not be appropriate for a regional secretary to buy a car from the contingency fund, which is there to serve the benefit of the members.

"As far as I am aware there are other financial arrangements made for the purchase of cars by regional secretaries."

Mr Parker, who was named in a 1997 telephone "shameline" of Britain's worst employers, has long been sensitive about claims over how union funds were used.

Mr Parker also enjoys a cheap union mortgage for his £150,000 Cambuslang home.

He has accused Mrs McAvoy, whose father-in-law, Robert Thomson, he replaced as regional secretary, of leaking details of his finances – including credit card bills from hotels and restaurants– to the press.

Yet union officials say Mr Parker cut their expenses. GMB organisers were the only officials of their kind in Scotland not allowed mobile phones.

He tried to win friends by regularly picking up tabs for drinks for union officials. At the union's 2001 conference in Aberdeen he sparked scandal by spending thousands of pounds on hospitality at the city's GMB social club.

Robert Parker has also dined out with top Labour politicians, including now First Minister Jack McConnell.

And union reps who stuck close to Mr Parker could expect to be rewarded with foreign trips and perks.

Last summer he sent one of his closest allies to a conference of banana pickers in Ecuador, South America.

Mr Parker also treated associates to tickets for football matches, including last year's Champions League Final in Glasgow, using union funds.

Even now Mr Parker has spared no expense in defending himself against Mrs McAvoy and Miss Senior.

The Evening Times has learned Mr Parker and the union have forked out £247,000 on legal fees for the two tribunals, after hiring Ian Truscott, the country's leading employment lawyer who charges up to £2000 a day, to handle his case.

That figure does not include spending in the last two-and-a-half weeks.

Yesterday, the GMB caved in and offered Miss Senior a settlement of £50,000, pledged to review its bullying policy and agreed to let Miss Senior have her say in public.

Yet Mr Parker, who weeks ago was told to slash £300,000 from his annual budget, last year could not find any cash to hire lawyers to fight for 900 former workers at the crashed Larkhall clothes factory Daks Simpson

As Mr Parker's highly- paid lawyers defended him against allegations from Mrs McAvoy, it was left to two rank-and-file union officials, neither with any legal experience, to try to win some redundancy money for the Daks Simpson workers, mostly women and some of the lowest paid in Scots manufacturing.

The Daks workers got nothing. A union insider said: "It was the ultimate irony. Robert Parker betrayed the very workers he was meant to be representing.

"A union which prides itself on producing some of the best literature on bullying and sexual harassment could find money to defend its own boss, but not the people who pay their subs."

But it was the evidence to come out of the two tribunals – one of which, Mrs McAvoy's, is due to resume later this year – that was to destroy Robert Parker's career.

Mrs McAvoy is claiming constructive and unfair dismissal, citing Mr Parker and the GMB, after she said she had to quit to escape him.

She said he touched her breast at a Christmas party and told her he wanted sex with her. She also claimed he forced her to touch him between the legs, and threatened to put a bottle in her face.

But his lawyers dismissed Mrs McAvoy's claims as fantasy and said she was "looking for excitement and was ripe for an affair".

Mr Parker accused her of having sex with another union official, Robert McGregor, at a Dundee hotel and of wearing revealing outfits to work.

Mrs McAvoy is now so nervous she can't bear to be in a room alone with a man. She was only able to get through the tribunal with the help of powerful anti-depressants.

Mr Parker was again to point the finger at his accuser in the tribunal brought by Mary Senior.

He claimed Miss Senior, 30, also had an affair with the union's north-east organiser Fraser Adam, jeopardising Mr Adam's relationship with his wife.

Mr Parker later withdrew the claim.

A year after Mrs McAvoy had quit her job in 1999, Mr Parker made suggestive remarks to a female colleague at a national conference, sparking a complaint that was also ultimately to lead to yet another employment tribunal, this time against GMB's boss in the north-west of England.

A GMB source said: "The real scandal about Robert Parker was that he was never suspended and was allowed to go on bullying people for years – even after serious allegations were made.

"The tragedy is we work for a union, but don't have a union to turn to when our bosses victimise us."

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/print/news/5013490.shtml

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
With branch reps like the very bitter Mr Flannigan, does the above really surprise you Captain?

I gather from Steve Hawes that his initial 'nicely nicely' approach has resulted in about 10 further members out of a potetial 30'000. :D

So now he's onto the 'shock' tactics, perhaps another 6 sympathetic souls will join. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
greenbadgecabby wrote:
I gather from Steve Hawes that his initial 'nicely nicely' approach has resulted in about 10 further members out of a potetial 30'000. :D

I'm reliably informed that the London GMB drivers sections has over 1500 members. Agreed nowhere near the LTDA, just yet (perhaps because your not forced to be a member), but far more taxi/PH drivers than the T&G has nationwide. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Sussex wrote:
greenbadgecabby wrote:
I gather from Steve Hawes that his initial 'nicely nicely' approach has resulted in about 10 further members out of a potetial 30'000. :D

I'm reliably informed that the London GMB drivers sections has over 1500 members. Agreed nowhere near the LTDA, just yet (perhaps because your not forced to be a member), but far more taxi/PH drivers than the T&G has nationwide. :wink:


Your not forced to join the LTDA, only if you join ComCab, and thats only a few thousand out of 25'000.

In my opinion everone should be in a trade organisation, (not the GMB) but the reality is only about 50% of the trade is represented.

Talking of the premier trades premier reps, heres this weeks TAXI paper online.

http://www.ltda.co.uk/taxi/issue_120/pg01.htm

Theres a cover feature on Edinburghs E7 decision.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
greenbadgecabby wrote:
Your not forced to join the LTDA, only if you join ComCab, and thats only a few thousand out of 25'000.

Remind me please?

How many members does the LTDA have?

And how many of them are made to join as part of the entry conditions for Comcab? :-k

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
About the 9000 mark, which regardless of the manner in which about 3000 ComCab drivers were recruited, is still a formidable force outnumbering any other trade org. in the UK.

The LCDC has about 2000.

The T&G has ??

The GMB, I can safely say, has none of the 25'000.

Perhaps they should have stuck to Boilermakers :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 974
Location: london
Union's for taxi driver's?, what's the point, we don't stick together.
What have the LTDA done about being forced to adopt taxi's that meet the emmision's control early? nothing.
The whole point of a union is unity, stick together to change thing's, but when it come's to taxi's it does'nt happen, why? because we are all self employed. Imagine the taxi driver's in london/birmingham/manchester etc going on strike for a week, it would never happen and the council's know it.

_________________
stressed controller!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
rambo wrote:
Union's for taxi driver's?, what's the point, we don't stick together.

Blimey I must have had a bad day, cos I'm agreeing with everyone at the mo. :shock:

As for the unions, I think their legal back-up and political support, are the only things that have any use for the taxi/PH trade.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
I been very lucky in avoiding a copy of CTN, but by all accounts the T&G aren't very happy with old Terrance. :lol:

And of course with Edinburgh over the E7. :lol: :lol:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Sussex wrote:
I been very lucky in avoiding a copy of CTN, but by all accounts the T&G aren't very happy with old Terrance. :lol:

And of course with Edinburgh over the E7. :lol: :lol:



It would appear the Edinburgh branch of the TGWU supported the introduction of an alternative vehicle.

Local people, local decisions and all that . . . . . . :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
rambo wrote:
What have the LTDA done about being forced to adopt taxi's that meet the emmision's control early? nothing.


A lot more than is available in the public domain.

Thats the beauty of membership you can phone up and find out whats being done for your £16 a month.

Suffice to say ALL legal avenues were explored by the legal team (and the LCDC's) in the end it would appear some things would just have been too risky and too expensive to fight.

On the other hand, the need for the low emissions zone was perhaps demonstrated well the other day during the heatwave when Londons air turned into a smog.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1079 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group