Ross wrote:
I was told an interesting true story today, about an incident at the airport not uncommon, and the drivers attempt to prove his point.
It is a long story, so I'll cut it short.
POLICE
A driver after dropping off his passenger at the airport, ran into the toilet for a pee, and on return found a parking ticket attached to his windscreen.
To say he was dissapointed is an under statement.
CAMERA
Being a tad p*ssed off the driver had noticed on several occasions police cars parked outside the terminal in different locations whilst their dedicated parking bay was empty. " They must be illegaly parked " he thought, so he started to take photo's of these police vehicles. When he thought he had enough, he past them on tothe authorities asking the obvious question.
ACTION
The driver in question was called up to the cab office and told that these vehicles where on emergencies, and if he takes anymore photographs, he will be banned from the airport.
I asked the driver to approach the evening news about the incident, but he is reluctent to do so in case there are reprecussions.
40 photographs over one weekend, Thats 40 emergencies
your thoughts please
Anyone banned from the Airport can appeal to the courts, as was the case at Heathrow some years ago.
Telling his story to a newspaper reporter is unlikely to instigate a ban and the reporter could most likely obtain details of all emergencies on that particular weekend as all such emergencies are probably logged.
If the exercise of taking photos was meant to show a flagrant disregard by the police for Airport bylaws, then the cab driver has the perfect opportunity to highlight this in the press.
JD