Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 8:47 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
South Wales Echo

August 3, 2006, Thursday

HEADLINE: Councillor leads call for traffic-calming

Residents claim traffic-calming must be installed on a busy road before someone is seriously hurt or killed. People in Barry say traffic is going too fast along Robbins Lane.


Now Councillor Richard Bertin has organised a petition for traffic-calming and is urging people to sign. He said: 'I saw a taxi travelling so fast that if a child had crossed in front of him he wouldn't have been able to stop.'

To sign the petition contact Coun Bertin on 01446 736227.
............................................................................


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
JD wrote:
'I saw a taxi travelling so fast that if a child had crossed in front of him he wouldn't have been able to stop.'

But then why didn't he report the driver? :? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Probably because his statement was meaningless piffle and made just to get his name in the press and so that if traffic calming is deployed then that'll be a good excuse for a photo opportunity.

I mean, you could be driving at 5mph and if a child crosses in front of you then you would't be able to stop.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2003 10:45 am
Posts: 913
Location: Plymouth, i think, i'll just check the A to Z!
there a campaign on the TV/radio at the moment. hit a kid at 40 theres a 80% chance they'll die, hit them at 30 theres a 80% chance they live. i'm sure you've seen it some where.

whats wrong with teaching your kids to stay of of the bloody road in the first place?

i remember when i was a little kid, if i crossed the road i'd get a whack off mum or dad.

these days they seem to be telling the kids the road is a safe place to play.
"dont worry jimmy, when the car hits you it will be the drivers fault, we can sue him and get lots of money"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Yes, it's the usual political corectness, just like with cyclists - they're more often on the pavements than the roads, few have lights, and bascically they just ignore every rule in the book. Yet the police ignore them, the politically correct describe them as 'vulnerable' at every opportunity, whereas thier vulnerability seems largely due to their own recklessness.

Remember that EU proposal from a couple of years ago whereby it would automatically be the driver's fault if he collided with a cyclist? But let's face it, it's more or less like that now, at least to the extent that if there is a collision the motorist is deemed guilty until proved innocent.

Of course, cyclists are inherently vulnerable, but the present approach merely shifts the blame and misses the point.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 591 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group