Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 6:14 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
kermit2482 wrote:
As for Illegal like i say they were hardly Illegal just exploiting, now what would you of done given the same circumstances fella?

In all fairness I could have done the exemption lark, as could have 150,000 other PH chaps.

But we didn't. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
kermit2482 wrote:
captain cab wrote:
If I can have my ten penneth, these people need licensed and there never should have been a loophole.



CC


I agree totally but its a fact of life that people will exploit loopholes :wink:


Its actually quite sad that people are advised on loopholes :shock:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 961
Location: Plymouth Devon
Sussex wrote:
kermit2482 wrote:
As for Illegal like i say they were hardly Illegal just exploiting, now what would you of done given the same circumstances fella?

In all fairness I could have done the exemption lark, as could have 150,000 other PH chaps.

But we didn't. :?


Fair enough and good on the taxi trade, i wont deny that one!!

_________________
Legal and proud

Loads a love from BERTIE !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 961
Location: Plymouth Devon
captain cab wrote:
kermit2482 wrote:
captain cab wrote:
If I can have my ten penneth, these people need licensed and there never should have been a loophole.



CC


I agree totally but its a fact of life that people will exploit loopholes :wink:


Its actually quite sad that people are advised on loopholes :shock:

CC



Absolutely agree 100% and to be honest i have a foot in both camps here as i have been both a limo op and a taxi driver. I just like to see a fair playing field for both !

_________________
Legal and proud

Loads a love from BERTIE !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
Which is what we will have in 6-12 months.

But I would prefer it to be now. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
Absolutely agree 100% and to be honest i have a foot in both camps here as i have been both a limo op and a taxi driver. I just like to see a fair playing field for both !


Isn't the fairest playing field one where the public are assured the driver and proprietor are correctly licensed, vetted and checked?

What worries the hell out of me is that LA's find its licensees easy targets, where those that operate outside licensing are seemingly immune.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 961
Location: Plymouth Devon
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
Absolutely agree 100% and to be honest i have a foot in both camps here as i have been both a limo op and a taxi driver. I just like to see a fair playing field for both !


Isn't the fairest playing field one where the public are assured the driver and proprietor are correctly licensed, vetted and checked?

What worries the hell out of me is that LA's find its licensees easy targets, where those that operate outside licensing are seemingly immune.

CC


Again i find i have to agree with you , BUT UNTIL NOW most councils have remained ignorant towards limo ops, so whos to blame, I BLAME THE COUNCILS :wink:

_________________
Legal and proud

Loads a love from BERTIE !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 1:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
kermit2482 wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
Absolutely agree 100% and to be honest i have a foot in both camps here as i have been both a limo op and a taxi driver. I just like to see a fair playing field for both !


Isn't the fairest playing field one where the public are assured the driver and proprietor are correctly licensed, vetted and checked?

What worries the hell out of me is that LA's find its licensees easy targets, where those that operate outside licensing are seemingly immune.

CC


Again i find i have to agree with you , BUT UNTIL NOW most councils have remained ignorant towards limo ops, so whos to blame, I BLAME THE COUNCILS :wink:



I am with you on this..my green friend :wink:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
Sussex wrote:
Which is what we will have in 6-12 months.

But I would prefer it to be now. :wink:


Look chaps my statement was not about the rights or wrongs of unlicensed vehicles operating a public service.

Quite obviously the public need to be assured of safe travel and so anyone operating for hire and reward needs to be licensed.

What I was pointing out, was the fact that Sussex and the TDO clan, are arguing FOR yet another restriction ................ and again they are arguing for it because it suits them.

For a "group" of people so opposed to restrictions I find it unbelievable that they are arguing for such a restriction of trade.

Now there are some, of which I am one, who would argue that restrictions allow a better service ................ the TDO clan deny this, stating quite clearly that the public should choose what methods of transport they use and how available they should be.

This argument shows the shortsighted attitude of the TDO clan ........................ you are either for restrictions within the trade or against them ........................ I say restrict everything, manage it properly and deliver the best possible service to the public.

Get the right drivers driving the right number of vehicles.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
GA wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Which is what we will have in 6-12 months.

But I would prefer it to be now. :wink:


Look chaps my statement was not about the rights or wrongs of unlicensed vehicles operating a public service.

Quite obviously the public need to be assured of safe travel and so anyone operating for hire and reward needs to be licensed.

What I was pointing out, was the fact that Sussex and the TDO clan, are arguing FOR yet another restriction ................ and again they are arguing for it because it suits them.

For a "group" of people so opposed to restrictions I find it unbelievable that they are arguing for such a restriction of trade.

Now there are some, of which I am one, who would argue that restrictions allow a better service ................ the TDO clan deny this, stating quite clearly that the public should choose what methods of transport they use and how available they should be.

This argument shows the shortsighted attitude of the TDO clan ........................ you are either for restrictions within the trade or against them ........................ I say restrict everything, manage it properly and deliver the best possible service to the public.

Get the right drivers driving the right number of vehicles.

B. Lucky :D


I did actually see where you were coming from, and your support for the repeal of section 75 (1) (b) was obviously vital :wink: just some others would prefer to see where your coming from but choose to / prefer to see otherwise :shock:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
Sussex wrote:
Which is what we will have in 6-12 months.

But I would prefer it to be now. :wink:


The argument is not about whether these vehicles should or shouldn't be licensed ................... because quite clearly they should be.

The argument is about the TDO clan supporting a restriction ........... when they claim the public should have a choice they quite obviously mean a choice which suits them.

The aim should always be "in the best interest of the public" and not "in the best interest of somebody who doesn't get his own way".

I see the double standards within this argument .............. as will others.

B. Lucky :roll:

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
in the best interest of the public"and the driver :wink:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
If some people can't see the difference between a standards restriction, and a numbers restriction, then that only confirms they haven't got a f***ing clue about the taxi/PH trade. ](*,)

Not that I needed any such confirmation.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
Sussex wrote:
If some people can't see the difference between a standards restriction, and a numbers restriction, then that only confirms they haven't got a f***ing clue about the taxi/PH trade. ](*,)

Not that I needed any such confirmation.


Well its nice to see confirmation that you agree with restrictions when it suits you, or on the grounds that suit you ......................... but oppose them when they don't.

I don't think you know fack all about the taxi trade Sussex .............. just that you know whats best for you.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
If some people can't see the difference between a standards restriction, and a numbers restriction, then that only confirms they haven't got a f***ing clue about the taxi/PH trade. ](*,)

Not that I needed any such confirmation.


They both consist of the word restriction :lol:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 571 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group