Taxi Driver Online

What me, worry?

I'm worried that you WON'T want it, not that you will.

_________________
Former taxi driver

I got the information about your banning second hand - you have to trust some people to tell the truth sometimes; It would appear I was given out of date information.

The truth as ever is a stranger to you and your Lord and Master; regarding my ownership of a taxi - which bit of I don't own a taxi don't you get

Now as ever you and Slapheid have had your fingers flying across the keyboard and produced a load of pixels, which only serves to obfuscate the issue of the simple questions I asked.

So just in-case you're not sure I'll repeat them one at a time:-

Who's responsible for the screw up on the Companies House document?

Where does it leave you with your council application?

There you go, just for you kept simple.

Now, any chance of a straightforward simple answer, or will you and Bawheid start with the duplicated attacks, as the steam blasts from your ears and you impatiently click several times in reply. Let's see you being a man and and dealing with the question in the mature manner you profess to possess

_________________
Keyboards and Cretins : Facts - not opinions - are the only truths

Damascus Moments - easy excuses for a sociopath

TDO the website of double standards and changing identities

Hey, if poacher jimbo is worried about Scottish independence then that must mean it's a good thing for Scotland.

Unless he's double bluffing of course? He wants us to think he's worried we'll leave the union, so that we think it's a good thing to do and leave, then he wins because the monkey's off his English back?

Wow, there are some clever guys hooked into this site.

I guess we shouldn't disappoint him then. We'll take the last dribble of oil out of the North Sea, bin Trident, manage our own affairs and go it alone. 300 years of a shotgun marriage ending in divorce.

That good enough for you poacher lad?

I think if the Scottish lads want to go independant, then good luck to them. I wish them well.

Provided they take all their MPs back, including the Scottsih mafia in the cabinet.

_________________
IDFIMH

Thought we'd leave those numpties to you

Anything that stops Gordon becoming PM is OK by me.

Tell me though. Do you just want indepence from England, or do you want to quit Europe too?

_________________
Former taxi driver

I think they want towed out into the middle of the North Sea, personally I reckon we should get the Poles in and have them rebuild Hadrians Wall.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin

To be honest I'm just pulling your leg.

I'm not sure that independence is a good thing.

We're in a world where folks are getting to gether, the global gig, why should we split.

Anyway, the Holyrood experience has been a pile of merde. They've got it consistently wrong as they desperately seek the big haymaker policy which is supposed to get us all enthusiastic about them.

But a pile of new labour merde from Holyrood is no different to a pile of new labour merde from Westminster.

I guess I'm just becoming cynical about politicians who are all ears before an election but become deaf after it.

No wonder that MSPs attracted no more than one in five of their electorate to vote for each of them.

Kinda tells a tale does it not?

I ws saying that the information I had was, that you weren't banned - turns out I was right, and you had the cheek to accuse me of lying

You also know that you're not banned, as you've been reading Fastblacks and quoting it here on this forum. Infact on the same thread you cut and paste from Alan G states that you are not banned, but rather than face him like a man (a phrase you and your puppetmaster are fond of) you sit in front of him on the Baxters Place rank, and pretend he's not there - you couldn't be scared of him could you - it's not like he's physically intimidating like your stringpuller - though I hear he's pretty good at holding his own in a "debate"

So back to the questions -

Who's responsible for the screw up on the Companies House document?

Where does it leave you with "your" council application?

Any chance of an answer before the your next lie is published

_________________
Keyboards and Cretins : Facts - not opinions - are the only truths

Damascus Moments - easy excuses for a sociopath

TDO the website of double standards and changing identities

So Alan G is good at debate, is he?

Consider his post on fasties.

<begin>

Taylor in his infinite stupidity writes in his Dark Orifice...

"Incidentally, I had a very sheep-ish, fidgety Gladstone behind me on the rank last night. It was very entertaining watching his antics.

I wonder if his discomfort had something to do with all the new night buses tht are coming on. Introduced by the very people that Mr G would tug his forelock to in total subservience, because they know best how to meet his needs."

Now I find his first comment extremely insulting; particularly when one considers that the only view Taylor has of a sheep is when he takes it from behind. I regard being likened to a sheep's arse somewhat distasteful. Once more it shows how he always puts his own spin on the truth.
After all his claims of sidelining Fasties and all who post here and declaring to all and sundry that we were irrelevant, left behind and various other things too stupid to mention, why does he still feel threatened enough to continue his insults and lies?
Taylor is not banned from Fasties, contrary to his lies. I could explain to him why a message such as he saw could appear but with his low IQ and infantile mentality, I doubt if he could understand any such explanation. However, I will be out working tonight and if he has the balls to approach me, I could try. But then we all know that Taylor is just a big mouth and without his bum chum to back him up, he'll sit alone in his cab like the pathetic little creep that he is.

Alan G

<end>

Taylor takes a sheep from behind?

What a masterful debating stroke. reduce the debate to the gutter as your first play. Quality.

" I regard being likened to a sheep's arse somewhat distasteful. Once more it shows how he always puts his own spin on the truth."

Where did I say this? Seems Mr G can't even read. Not important for a debater though is it? Well, not a good one anyhow.

"Once more it shows how he always puts his own spin on the truth."

Really? How so, particularly?

After all his claims of sidelining Fasties and all who post here and declaring to all and sundry that we were irrelevant, left behind and various other things too stupid to mention, why does he still feel threatened enough to continue his insults and lies?

Anyone looked at the site recently. It is dead. Even the sewing bee has left it. Course, if he posts an apology for the disgraceful way he has attacked me, I might just post again. And apologises for the way the retard formerly known as Scottie behaved?

Taylor is not banned from Fasties, contrary to his lies.

Yes I was. I posted the message to prove it. Even TC recognises that that he was told a pile of merde. Now, as it's AG who does the banning, isn't he a liar for pretending that I wasn't banned. Of course, I'm not banned now. I'm double warned with a pretty grren blob. I reckon he knows, through his son-in-law (whom I've met and have immense repsect for) that I am a glorious Hibernian supporter. Hence the appreciation of the green. Sorry I digress. Anyway, I was banned. I wasn't lying. By inference, AG was.

I could explain to him why a message such as he saw could appear but with his low IQ and infantile mentality, I doubt if he could understand any such explanation.

So why doesn't he? And what kind of site is he running? How clever is he as an administrator when he can tell users they're banned, and there's a perfectly good reason why they're told they're banned, but they're not really banned. God save us from computers, and the numpties who put the data in.

And the IQ and mentality thing? Raving jealousy or what?

However, I will be out working tonight and if he has the balls to approach me, I could try. But then we all know that Taylor is just a big mouth and without his bum chum to back him up, he'll sit alone in his cab like the pathetic little creep that he is.

No problem facing him. I would welcome it. But the sideswipe at Garry is a wee bit off. Anyway, how did he know the Skull and I ..... ?

Alan G

This is the only factual part of his post. I think?

Truth is, the Evening news article was an exocet. The worrying thing for AG and his sycophantic protection of the status quo, because he believes it will deliver him some perceived status in the trade, is when drivers approach me and tell me that they've got three kids, and they don't see why they should pay rentals when they can drive their own taxi for £190 per week, which allows them to work around their own family commitments, and doubles up as their private (tax funded) vehicle.

What part of this does AG have a problem with?

So Alan G is good at debate, is he?

Consider his post on fasties.

<begin>

Taylor in his infinite stupidity writes in his Dark Orifice...

"Incidentally, I had a very sheep-ish, fidgety Gladstone behind me on the rank last night. It was very entertaining watching his antics.

I wonder if his discomfort had something to do with all the new night buses tht are coming on. Introduced by the very people that Mr G would tug his forelock to in total subservience, because they know best how to meet his needs."

Now I find his first comment extremely insulting; particularly when one considers that the only view Taylor has of a sheep is when he takes it from behind. I regard being likened to a sheep's arse somewhat distasteful. Once more it shows how he always puts his own spin on the truth.
After all his claims of sidelining Fasties and all who post here and declaring to all and sundry that we were irrelevant, left behind and various other things too stupid to mention, why does he still feel threatened enough to continue his insults and lies?
Taylor is not banned from Fasties, contrary to his lies. I could explain to him why a message such as he saw could appear but with his low IQ and infantile mentality, I doubt if he could understand any such explanation. However, I will be out working tonight and if he has the balls to approach me, I could try. But then we all know that Taylor is just a big mouth and without his bum chum to back him up, he'll sit alone in his cab like the pathetic little creep that he is.

Alan G

<end>

Taylor takes a sheep from behind?

What a master debater AG is. What a masterful debating stroke. Outplay your opponent by reducing the debate to the gutter as your first play. Quality.

" I regard being likened to a sheep's arse somewhat distasteful. Once more it shows how he always puts his own spin on the truth."

Where did I say this? Seems Mr G can't even read. Not important for a debater though is it? Well, not a good one anyhow.

"Once more it shows how he always puts his own spin on the truth."

Really? How so, particularly?

After all his claims of sidelining Fasties and all who post here and declaring to all and sundry that we were irrelevant, left behind and various other things too stupid to mention, why does he still feel threatened enough to continue his insults and lies?

Anyone looked at the site recently. It is dead. Even the sewing bee has left it. Course, if he posts an apology for the disgraceful way he has attacked me, I might just post again. And apologises for the way the retard formerly known as Scottie behaved?

Taylor is not banned from Fasties, contrary to his lies.

Yes I was. I posted the message to prove it. Even TC recognises that that he was told a pile of merde. Now, as it's AG who does the banning, isn't he a liar for pretending that I wasn't banned. Of course, I'm not banned now. I'm double warned with a pretty grren blob. I reckon he knows, through his son-in-law (whom I've met and have immense repsect for) that I am a glorious Hibernian supporter. Hence the appreciation of the green. Sorry I digress. Anyway, I was banned. I wasn't lying. By inference, AG was.

I could explain to him why a message such as he saw could appear but with his low IQ and infantile mentality, I doubt if he could understand any such explanation.

So why doesn't he? And what kind of site is he running? How clever is he as an administrator when he can tell users they're banned, and there's a perfectly good reason why they're told they're banned, but they're not really banned. God save us from computers, and the numpties who put the data in.

And the IQ and mentality thing? Raving jealousy or what?

However, I will be out working tonight and if he has the balls to approach me, I could try. But then we all know that Taylor is just a big mouth and without his bum chum to back him up, he'll sit alone in his cab like the pathetic little creep that he is.

No problem facing him. I would welcome it. But the sideswipe at Garry is a wee bit off. Anyway, how did he know the Skull and I ..... ?

Alan G

This is the only factual part of his post. I think?

Truth is, the Evening news article was an exocet. The worrying thing for AG and his sycophantic protection of the status quo, because he believes it will deliver him some perceived status in the trade, is when drivers approach me and tell me that they've got three kids, and they don't see why they should pay rentals when they can drive their own taxi for £190 per week, which allows them to work around their own family commitments, and doubles up as their private (tax funded) vehicle.

What part of this does AG have a problem with?

"and doubles up as their private (tax funded) vehicle" they would need to check that their ins. policy covers private use. not all do.

You gonna have one Diesel?

and you were doing so so well but thats going to far



CHANGE THAT LIGHT TO MAROON ON FASTIES

Aaaaarrrrrggggggghhhhh!!!!!!