Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 2:11 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
Sussex wrote:
GA wrote:
Because I think the Law states that a Hackney Carriage is only a Hackney Carriage within its prescribed distance ................. once it leaves that prescribed distance to work continually it becomes unlicensed and therefore unable to undertake work under a PH contract in another area.

A hackney carriage is always a hackney carriage, no matter where it is.

It can only pick up from the streets within it's area un-booked, but it is never a PH.


I'm not saying that it becomes a PH dunderhead ................... and it ceases to be a HC when it leaves its prescribed distance.

SO WHAT DOES IT BECOME

If I drive to Sussex with a fare I am a HC ................ but as soon as that customer gets out I have to comply with any laws I receive dispensation from until I reach the prescribed distance I am licensed to. I am also liable to prosecution if I illuminate my top sign and for hire light until I return to my prescribed distance, why is that I wonder.

Sort yourself out.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
GA wrote:
It has to be both JD.

The hypothetical Berwick driver is licensed as a Hackney in Berwick ............ when the vehicle leaves Berwick it ceases to be a Hackney Carriage and as it cannot be anything else it cannot be used as a PH vehicle in Newcastle.


It is not a hypothetical event.

According to Newcastle licensing, vehicles from Tynedale, Derwentside, Eden and Berwick are operating in Newcastle as private hire. Therefore the Newcastle LO is presented with an abundance of riches of who to prosecute? My money is on Newcastle taking no legal action whatsoever and the reason for that is because they are definitely unsure of their legal standing, even though they have taken Barristers advice?

Quote:
1847 Act that a Hackney Carriage should proceed to the closest available rank after each hiring.


Not entirley, that reference is a bylaw and only if you're plying for hire in the licensing area.

Here is an example.

7. The driver of a hackney carriage shall, when plying for hire in any street and not actually hired:

(a) proceed with reasonable speed to one of the stands fixed by the byelaw in that behalf;
...............................................

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
JD wrote:
Here is an example.

7. The driver of a hackney carriage shall, when plying for hire in any street and not actually hired:

(a) proceed with reasonable speed to one of the stands fixed by the byelaw in that behalf;
...............................................

Regards

JD


But the plying for hire can only be conducted within the prescribed distance.

It seems that a HC is only legislated for whilst within the prescribed distance ................ so my question remains ............. what does that vehicle become when it leaves the prescribed distance.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
The whole thing is as a result of what I believe is a misinterpretation of the Gladen judgement.

Some local authorities have never required HC's to have PH operators licenses, be this before or after the gladen judgement.

The argument does throw up counter arguments such as a local authority issuing a license then not being in a position where it can realistically do spot checks and any form of quality control.

This leads on to the Duty of Care argument.

This leads on to standards of applicants, as presumably the conditions in one area are too onerous so people are going to get licensed elsewhere....shades of a recent thread citing South Ribble spring to mind.

It leads on to standards of vehicles.

It is in my opinion reasonably clear a taxi was and is licensed to operate within its prescribed distance. This was the case in 1847 and is the case now.

It is admittedly a very interesting argument.

I personally can foresee everyone being made to buy a TX4 with CRB checks every year, then it doesnt really matter where you get your license from. :lol:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
GA wrote:
JD wrote:
Here is an example.

7. The driver of a hackney carriage shall, when plying for hire in any street and not actually hired:

(a) proceed with reasonable speed to one of the stands fixed by the byelaw in that behalf;
...............................................

Regards

JD


But the plying for hire can only be conducted within the prescribed distance.


The purpose of that outdated byelaw was to stop horse and carts from causing an obstruction by standing and plying for hire all over the place. There will always be instances when a vehicle is not plying for hire inside the presecribed distance, hence the wording of the byelaw

Sheffield for instance don't include that particular wording in their bylaws

"The driver of a hackney carriage shall, when plying for hire in any street and not actually hired:

(a) proceed with reasonable speed to one of the stands fixed by the byelaw in that behalf"


Quote:
It seems that a HC is only legislated for whilst within the prescribed distance ................ so my question remains ............. what does that vehicle become when it leaves the prescribed distance.


It means a hackney carriage can only stand and ply for hire in the authority it is licensed. Private bookings is an entirely different proposition.

A hackney carriage is always a hackney carriage regardless of where it is. It does not change its spots. Just because a hackney carriage in Manchester cannot ply for hire in Newcastle it does not mean it is not a hackney carriage in Manchester for the purpose of taking a private booking anywhere in the country.

The problem you have to resolve is can a Manchester hackney carriage take a job in Newcastle from an agent in Newcastle? I can see you're at sixes and sevens with this issue but to me and Jim Button it is quite clear? lol.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
The problem you have to resolve is can a Manchester hackney carriage take a job in Newcastle from an agent in Newcastle? I can see you're at sixes and sevens with this issue but to me and Jim Button it is quite clear? lol.


Okay JD describe an 'agent' :wink:

regards

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
The problem you have to resolve is can a Manchester hackney carriage take a job in Newcastle from an agent in Newcastle? I can see you're at sixes and sevens with this issue but to me and Jim Button it is quite clear? lol.


Okay JD describe an 'agent'


An agent is someone who acts on anothers behalf?

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
JD wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
The problem you have to resolve is can a Manchester hackney carriage take a job in Newcastle from an agent in Newcastle? I can see you're at sixes and sevens with this issue but to me and Jim Button it is quite clear? lol.


Okay JD describe an 'agent'


An agent is someone who acts on anothers behalf?

Regards

JD


Yes.....and the wording of section 80 describes a PH operator as someone who accepts a booking for a private hire vehicle...

There does appear to be a rather large hole to me.

As there's nothing seemingly getting in the way of a person acting as an agent for a hackney carriage.....which brings us into the shanks case argument.....and a further reason for my bad head :wink:

regards

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
JD wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
The problem you have to resolve is can a Manchester hackney carriage take a job in Newcastle from an agent in Newcastle? I can see you're at sixes and sevens with this issue but to me and Jim Button it is quite clear? lol.


Okay JD describe an 'agent'


An agent is someone who acts on anothers behalf?

Regards

JD


Yes.....and the wording of section 80 describes a PH operator as someone who accepts a booking for a private hire vehicle...


But a hackney carriage is not a private hire vehicle?

Quote:
There does appear to be a rather large hole to me.


Not so large that it cannot be filled? lol

Quote:
As there's nothing seemingly getting in the way of a person acting as an agent for a hackney carriage.


That would appear so.

If I ever get a job going to Carlisle I'll give you a call on your mobile when you are in Newcastle just to test the theory?

That would give me the opportunity to take you to court for obtaining a job in Manchester while being out of your licensed area of Carlisle. Do you think my case would prove successful?

What fascinates you about shanks?

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
But a hackney carriage is not a private hire vehicle?


:roll:
The private hire companies in Sefton as far as I understand it are licensed to operate licensed private hire vehicles, if the company allows any vehicle that is not licensed as private hire then they're committing an offence, so a Hackney from another area becomes a unlicensed private hire vehicle, surely it is the operator and the vehicle driver/ owner who are committing the offence

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
MR T wrote:
The private hire companies in Sefton as far as I understand it are licensed to operate licensed private hire vehicles.


Anyone who operates a private vehicle has to be liecensed. Also the vehicle and driver have to be licensed in the area that the vehicles are being operated.

Quote:
if the company allows any vehicle that is not licensed as private hire then they're committing an offence


All accept a hackney carriage.

Quote:
so a Hackney from another area becomes a unlicensed private hire vehicle, surely it is the operator and the vehicle driver/ owner who are committing the offence


A licensed Hackney carriage or licensed London Cab is not a private hire vehicle and the law distinquishes that fact in section 46 (a) of the 1976 act.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
MR T wrote:
But a hackney carriage is not a private hire vehicle?


:roll:
The private hire companies in Sefton as far as I understand it are licensed to operate licensed private hire vehicles, if the company allows any vehicle that is not licensed as private hire then they're committing an offence, so a Hackney from another area becomes a unlicensed private hire vehicle, surely it is the operator and the vehicle driver/ owner who are committing the offence


What offence would a driver of a hackney carriage commit, under which section and of which act?

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
JD wrote:
If I ever get a job going to Carlisle I'll give you a call on your mobile when you are in Newcastle just to test the theory?

That would give me the opportunity to take you to court for obtaining a job in Manchester while being out of your licensed area of Carlisle. Do you think my case would prove successful?


Hang on a minute ................ I think we are missing the point here ............... its probably just me but can we confirm some details.

A HC vehicle licence is a licence to operate that vehicle as a HC.

A PH vehicle licence is a licence to work through a licensed PH operator.

A HC vehicle propeitor is allowed to accept hirings.

A PH vehicle propietor can only accept hirings via a Licensed PH operator.


None of these facts are disputed .............. at least I don't think thay are.

A HC vehicle can in the same way as a PH operator accept bookings via a telephone. But -

A PH operator must ensure that the vehicle and driver are licensed within the same borough as they are.

A HC vehicle propietor cannot pass that work onto a PH vehicle unless they have a additional licence to operate PH vehicles.


Are we still agreed up to now?

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
GA wrote:
JD wrote:
If I ever get a job going to Carlisle I'll give you a call on your mobile when you are in Newcastle just to test the theory?

That would give me the opportunity to take you to court for obtaining a job in Manchester while being out of your licensed area of Carlisle. Do you think my case would prove successful?


Hang on a minute ................ I think we are missing the point here ............... its probably just me but can we confirm some details.

[i]A HC vehicle licence is a licence to operate that vehicle as a HC.


As long as a licensed hackney carriage driver drives the hackney carriage vehicle it can ply for public hire within the prescribed distance of the authority that issued the license. For the purpose of private bookings, hackney carriage and London Cab drivers who drive a licensed hackney carriage vehicle are exempt from section 46 (a) of the 1976 act. Everything else is immaterial.

The proof naturally resides in the proverbial pudding but Licensing officers have the opportunity to test the law if they think otherwise.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
JD wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
The problem you have to resolve is can a Manchester hackney carriage take a job in Newcastle from an agent in Newcastle? I can see you're at sixes and sevens with this issue but to me and Jim Button it is quite clear? lol.


Okay JD describe an 'agent'


An agent is someone who acts on anothers behalf?

Regards

JD


Yes.....and the wording of section 80 describes a PH operator as someone who accepts a booking for a private hire vehicle...


"private hire vehicle' means a motor vehicle constructed or adapted to seat fewer than nine passengers, "OTHER" than a hackney carriage or public service vehicle or a London cab, which is provided for hire with the services of a driver for the purpose of carrying passengers".

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 609 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group