Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 12:17 am

Board index » General » News

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 8 of 8
  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
JD wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
Unless of course you have found a case that supports your claim?


Hull vs. Wilson

DPP vs. Com Cab and others

:wink:

regards

CC


And what have these cases got to do with section 75?

I would re read the post again Cap, Mr GA referred to pink ladies, section 75. However by his comments that "he was saving them" it just goes to show how little he knows about the law.

You could have mentioned one particular case but that case doesn't go anywhere near to addressing the circumstance that pink ladies were working under.

Regards

JD


I thought he was referring to the HC cross border malarky.

Albert vs. Motor Insurers Bureau (thrown in for the purposes of mild amusement)

Crawley vs. Ovenden

DPP vs. Sikondar

lyons vs. Denscombe

regards

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
GA
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
My statement was about changing the laws that do not promote every vehicle used for hire and reward to be licensed by the authority in which they operate.

You say you don't get involved with changing law ................. but you do get involved in removing laws which you choose do not suit your private and secret grand plan.

The questions I would like you to answer are -

1 - What do you see as the quality standards you are seeking to have implimented, particularly in the context of replacing quantative restrictions?

2 - You have a "plan" which you do not want to share ................ however you claim that certain laws need to be changed in order for your secret plan to work, what are these law changes?

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.
Top
 Profile  
 
jimbo
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Sussex wrote:
GA wrote:
You standing by quality restrictions Suspect or are you sailing away like your friend JD.

Unlike you I've always had the same opinion that quality standards are the only way forward, not quantity restrictions.


We know you have always held the same opinion, Sussex, (almost as long as JD, by coincidence?) but why?

If you remove Quantity restrictions, the only option would appear to be Quality restrictions. But would quality restrictions be seen for what they often are, an artificial barrier to free and unfetterred trade, surely illegal under EU regulation?

But why, oh why, do you see it as an either quality or quantity situation?


Why not QUANTITY AND QUALITY CONTROL?

It works here!

_________________
Former taxi driver
Top
 Profile  
 
captain cab
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
jimbo wrote:
Sussex wrote:
GA wrote:
You standing by quality restrictions Suspect or are you sailing away like your friend JD.

Unlike you I've always had the same opinion that quality standards are the only way forward, not quantity restrictions.


We know you have always held the same opinion, Sussex, (almost as long as JD, by coincidence?) but why?

If you remove Quantity restrictions, the only option would appear to be Quality restrictions. But would quality restrictions be seen for what they often are, an artificial barrier to free and unfetterred trade, surely illegal under EU regulation?

But why, oh why, do you see it as an either quality or quantity situation?


Why not QUANTITY AND QUALITY CONTROL?

It works here!


now that's a rebelious point of view :lol:

Yahoo! ah higher, higher, higher
Yahoo! ah find your way unto the Lord

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin
Top
 Profile  
 
JD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 7:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
JD wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Quote:
Unless of course you have found a case that supports your claim?


Hull vs. Wilson

DPP vs. Com Cab and others

:wink:

regards

CC


And what have these cases got to do with section 75?

I would re read the post again Cap, Mr GA referred to pink ladies, section 75. However by his comments that "he was saving them" it just goes to show how little he knows about the law.

You could have mentioned one particular case but that case doesn't go anywhere near to addressing the circumstance that pink ladies were working under.

Regards

JD


I thought he was referring to the HC cross border malarky.

Albert vs. Motor Insurers Bureau (thrown in for the purposes of mild amusement)

Crawley vs. Ovenden

DPP vs. Sikondar

lyons vs. Denscombe

regards

CC


Yes but none of them appertain to pink ladies.

Regards

JD
Top
 Profile  
 
GA
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
GA wrote:
My statement was about changing the laws that do not promote every vehicle used for hire and reward to be licensed by the authority in which they operate.

You say you don't get involved with changing law ................. but you do get involved in removing laws which you choose do not suit your private and secret grand plan.

The questions I would like you to answer are -

1 - What do you see as the quality standards you are seeking to have implimented, particularly in the context of replacing quantative restrictions?

2 - You have a "plan" which you do not want to share ................ however you claim that certain laws need to be changed in order for your secret plan to work, what are these law changes?

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.
Top
 Profile  
 
GA
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
GA wrote:
GA wrote:
My statement was about changing the laws that do not promote every vehicle used for hire and reward to be licensed by the authority in which they operate.

You say you don't get involved with changing law ................. but you do get involved in removing laws which you choose do not suit your private and secret grand plan.

The questions I would like you to answer are -

1 - What do you see as the quality standards you are seeking to have implimented, particularly in the context of replacing quantative restrictions?

2 - You have a "plan" which you do not want to share ................ however you claim that certain laws need to be changed in order for your secret plan to work, what are these law changes?

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 8 of 8
  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Board index » General » News

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 549 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group