Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 8:25 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
rambo wrote:
In london he would not be insured, Pre booked work only.

He might not have been insured, but his punters would have been. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
TDO wrote:
GA wrote:
The reason GA wants to protect premiums is that he ...............................................................................................................................



Well I addressed the point yesterday, and in truth I don't know the exact reason.

How about protecting the fleet owners in Gateshead and stopping drivers running their own taxi?


90% of drivers in Gateshead AND 100% of our members are OWNER DRIVERS. The people who own fleets of cars own both HC and PH cars and own PH offices.

TDO wrote:
Or perhaps the threatening nature of your other recent post gives the game away - it's just opposition for the sake of it, and a vindictive desire to see people who've disagreed with you intimidated.

Why else would you want to know the identity of people who self-evidently want to remain anon? Bit sad, innit?


Oh and I've shouted peoples identities from the rooftops haven't I ........... ask you pal Sussex.
TDO wrote:
I well recall the PMs you sent me several years ago when your Metro was torched and saying that you agreed with the need to stay anon. And on this forum even when you've been clear about your ID at later dates you've been PMing Admin bleating that your anonymity had been compromised.

Thus a hypocrite, bully and all-round bullshitter - anything I've missed :lol:


Yeah ............ the truth.

But lets not let something as boring as the truth get in the way of the made up crap you come up with.

B. Lucky :shock:

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
GA wrote:
90% of drivers in Gateshead AND 100% of our members are OWNER DRIVERS. The people who own fleets of cars own both HC and PH cars and own PH offices.

How many would have been owner drivers if your council hadn't de-limited?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
I would say that 90% of plates were held by owner drivers before deregulation Sussex.

As the number of plates and vehicles has tripled in the HC sector the number of PH has risen by approx 50% so your asumption that PH lads would change to HC hasn't been the case here ................. although I do accept the fact that it may well somewhere else.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
My point is that you are representing owners that you would prefer to be non-owners. :shock:

Treating folks the same is really the only way forward. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
rambo wrote:
Skull, I am happy with the fact that someone who broke the law has been punished. What would you prefer?, someone who touts gets away with it.

Just imagine your a driver and you go to pick a job up but a tout has nicked it, you as the driver are the loser. In london where I work, touting is a very bad problem, and i'm glad when someone get's nicked for doing it.
If that makes me sad, then so be it.



I never said he did not do wrong and that he should not have been punished. Nor did I claim he should have got away with it.

But you are right it does make you sad. I feel sorry you need the emotional turmoil of others to feed your own your own lack of self-esteem. That is not to say I do not take satisfaction when beating someone I consider to be my enemy. I just find it shallow to spend your life looking for undeserving victims. There is no guilt in beating an enemy who is equal to or greater than oneself. What makes you sad is your need for a victim, any victim, especially one who is facing the prospect of being punished for the same crime twice.


But at least you are honest about being sad. It's only a pity GA is not the same. :roll:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
TDO wrote:
Well it's drivel from people like you that encourages people to risk their homes, so shouldn't you be taking a good look at yourself in this regard?


Hang on a minute here Dusty .................... what encourages a person to want a plate ............ the people in the industry who are facing bankruptcy or the people claiming having a HC plate is like winning the lottery.

The fact is that all you people fighting to get a HC plate shows that you believe that it has a value, otherwise you wouldn't be fighting.

Accept the truth ........... and come down from cloud cuckoo land.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
Sussex wrote:
My point is that you are representing owners that you would prefer to be non-owners. :shock:

Treating folks the same is really the only way forward. :wink:


I wouldn't prefer that at all Sussex ............... its clearly what you would like me to think so that you could berate me further but I must disappoint you.

Professional drivers should have the opportunity to own the vehicle and licence.

Un-professional drivers should be signing on the dole.

Law breakers should be excluded from this trade as they reflect badly on those who accept the responsibility of being involved in our great profession.

Just wanting to do this job is not enough, for me and the public recognise us as being the same as the worst driver they have met ................. that angers me greatly.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
GA wrote:
Sussex wrote:
My point is that you are representing owners that you would prefer to be non-owners. :shock:

Treating folks the same is really the only way forward. :wink:


I wouldn't prefer that at all Sussex ............... its clearly what you would like me to think so that you could berate me further but I must disappoint you.

Professional drivers should have the opportunity to own the vehicle and licence.

Un-professional drivers should be signing on the dole.

Law breakers should be excluded from this trade as they reflect badly on those who accept the responsibility of being involved in our great profession.

Just wanting to do this job is not enough, for me and the public recognise us as being the same as the worst driver they have met ................. that angers me greatly.

B. Lucky :D



Oh spare me the moral indignation you sad little man. The only value you see in law breakers being excluded from anything is you climbing on to your pedestal to look down on everyone while having a wan*.

If you had your way no one would be driving taxis unless rubber stamped by you…. The trade is full of guys who have broken the law at one time or another and this doesn’t make them unfit to drive a taxi.

What about having the public vetted before they can hire your taxi? As ridiculous as this may seem it’s no different than having toss** like you passing judgment on everyone else.

Are you telling us you have never had so much as a parking fine?

What a wan* stain you really are. :roll:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
GA wrote:
Professional drivers should have the opportunity to own the vehicle and licence.

Welcome to the gang. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Quote:
90% of drivers in Gateshead AND 100% of our members are OWNER DRIVERS. The people who own fleets of cars own both HC and PH cars and own PH offices.


So you're saying that the PH offices can run fleets of HC, yet a new HC driver can't run one unless he pays a premium for a licence?

Yes, great achievement that =D>


Quote:
Oh and I've shouted peoples identities from the rooftops haven't I ........... ask you pal Sussex


No, you're more subtle about it.

I mean, you didn't publish the name of a sports injury specialisit solicitor on a website and said that he was running TDO :lol: when he was actually in hospital having an operation :? , but you know a man who did :shock:

And what exactly did you mean by this the other day?

As far as stopping digging goes I'm in a win win situation ..................... I either find out who you and JD are or I end up in OZ .................... either way I have a big smile on my face.

Do you want me to give you 21 to hide ready go 1...........2...........3..............4.................5..............


You never did say why finding out who we are is such an imperative, and the second part of your message speaks for itself.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
GA wrote:


Professional drivers should have the opportunity to own the vehicle and licence.



So why is your crowning achievment to stop drivers from doing just that?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
TDO wrote:
GA wrote:


Professional drivers should have the opportunity to own the vehicle and licence.



So why is your crowning achievement to stop drivers from doing just that?


The aim of the restriction is to stop everyone from gaining access into the trade in an area where there is no management of operation.

This restriction is temporary and should be in place until such time as the council can be assured of a superior quality standard from those entrusted to carry the licence.

The aim should be the right people driving the right number of vehicles.

Skull suggests that I believe myself to be whiter than white ............. whereas I just consider myself to be professional in my approach and have pride in the service I offer. I can only imagine that Skulls couldn't give a fook attitude has landed him in quite a bit of trouble, the accusations that he has more than one count of assault against him seems to suggest his attitude could well question his fitness and propriety.

I don't want thugs driving taxis ............... I don't want them tarnishing MY reputation or the reputation of the profession we all choose to work in, it seems others aren't so bothered and just use the "quality" argument to try and substantiate their otherwise self centred argument.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
GA wrote:
The aim of the restriction is to stop everyone from gaining access into the trade in an area where there is no management of operation.

But if the restrictions you want had happened say 5 years ago, then many of the folks you represent now would be not be owners.

And they would be forced to work under the ops you don't think too highly of. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
Sussex wrote:
GA wrote:
The aim of the restriction is to stop everyone from gaining access into the trade in an area where there is no management of operation.

But if the restrictions you want had happened say 5 years ago, then many of the folks you represent now would be not be owners.

And they would be forced to work under the ops you don't think too highly of. :?



No Sussex ................. if the changes had happened 5 years ago we would have entry to the trade controlled by professional standards and not by numbers.

By the end of this year people who wish to act proffessionally as a professional driver within our industry will be able to ........................... and those who couldn't give a fook can just fook off.

We either start looking after our punters and each other or we will have no trade ......................... its really as simple as that.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 126 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerberus and 380 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group