Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Apr 26, 2026 3:19 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 146 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
allo allo wrote:
I used to be a proponent of de-limitation, but I'm now having second thoughts.

The reason is simply that without some control you end up with an over supply which simply drives down fares and pushes up the number of hours drivers work just to earn a reasonable living.

If you work 37.5 hrs as a typical Office worker does then you'll be on the breadline. Even doing 45-50 hours as most of us at least do is no use these days.

If there was no control over the number of supermarkets you'd have Asda Tesco Sainsbury Morrisson Lidl Aldi Somerfield Waitrose etc, all in every town killing off smaller shops and reducing the town centres to banks and estate agents. And of course there would be price competition driving down prices.......sound familiar?
Every company employs the correct number of workers for it's workload. The taxi business should be no different.

I have changed my mind about the principle, however I'm not sure what the best way or the correct levels should be and I think PH should be limited as well.

Maybe 50% of a town's PH should become HC as well as the HC already in place then there should be a cap on at that level, but maybe only HC that are independent (ie NOT on a radio circuit should be allowed to pick up from ranks). Then PH should be abolished! Remaining HC drivers could work on circuits and pick up if approached on the street.

I haven't thought all this through ... I am making it up as I type but I hope it provokes a debate, but that we can avoid slagging off each other personally.


Having only independent HC working from ranks and having other HC working from offices that aren't allowed to work from ranks ........................ Yeah that'll work ..................... wouldn't it not be easier to call the vehicles that work from offices PH vehicles.

I think that HC numbers should be limited AT THE RIGHT LEVEL TO PROVIDE BEST SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC.

What needs to happen first is that we need to clearly identify the difference between HC and PH .................. that is so that when the public are consulted they know there is a difference between booking a taxi to pick them up from home through an operator and waiting for a HC at a rank.

The majority of the public believe that there is no point in phoning for a taxi between 11pm and 4 am because all the cars are working from the ranks ................. ffs in many areas the offices are known as ranks.

Delimitation is lazy government ......................... and we should not stand for it.
The public should be regularly consulted through surveys ................... that is so the policies locally can be updated to provide the public's need.

Good post though "Allo Allo" I'm sure the debate will be nice and quiet.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
jasbar wrote:
Kinda makes me wonder how London survives without limitation of numbers.




There's a small bonus which consists of about 8 million residents and another few million business customers during the week.

Plus you can earn £40K driving a tube down here, so theres not a great rush of potential candidates to drive a Taxi.

All in all, London's quite unique, and does'nt make a good example if were talking about a market town in the Yorkshire Dales, or a new town in Fife.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
allo allo wrote:
The reason is simply that without some control you end up with an over supply which simply drives down fares and pushes up the number of hours drivers work just to earn a reasonable living.


So what controls do you propose?

Quote:
If you work 37.5 hrs as a typical Office worker does then you'll be on the breadline. Even doing 45-50 hours as most of us at least do is no use these days.


I don't think anyone has twisted your arm to drive a taxi, have they? What is it you actually want in respect of restrictions and why? And how would these restrictions be implemented?

Quote:
If there was no control over the number of supermarkets


So its the competition you don't like but I suppose competition was alright before you entered the taxi trade? However since you have entered the trade you are now of the opinion that you don't like the number of cabs competing for the limited number of jobs?

Quote:
Every company employs the correct number of workers for it's workload. The taxi business should be no different.


I'm afraid the local council is not a company and the comparison is far removed from reality. A councils job is to issue licenses but perhaps under your scenario the council instead of having a discression under section 16 to limit limiting hackney carriage proprietor licenses, they should also have a discretion to limit hackney carriage driver licenses and only issue proprietor licenses to a person who intends to drive their own vehicle and restrict vehicle licenses to one per person? That would have an effect on supply and demand wouldn't it?

Quote:
I have changed my mind about the principle, however I'm not sure what the best way or the correct levels should be and I think PH should be limited as well.


When you do find the best way and what you think the correct levels should be, let us know, i'm sure it will make interesting reading?

How do you propose to limit private hire competition?

Quote:
Maybe 50% of a town's PH should become HC as well as the HC already in place then there should be a cap on level, but maybe only HC that are independent (ie NOT on a radio circuit should be allowed to pick up from ranks). Then PH should be abolished! Remaining HC drivers could work on circuits and pick up if approached on the street.


How would your new legislation read?

Quote:
I haven't thought all this through ... I am making it up as I type but


From your comments above I would aggree with you and draw the conclusion that you haven't put much thought into what you are saying?

The one thing that stands out in your post is that you don't like competition so you want it restricted. You don't want anyone else to own or drive a Taxi in your area. It would appear the only solution you offer is for a council to limit proprietor licenses, yet we are already at that position in 2007.

Your post on deregulation of numbers or delimitation whatever you want to call it, is not unique. We have hundreds of them on TDO and obviously some have more substance than others but not surprisingly they all center on one thing, quantity controls. I think if anyone is to carry the argument forward in respect of controls no matter what those controls might be then they should think about what they wan't and how it can be implemented? Especially when you have to take into account that we already have legislation in place that dictates how licenses are issued.

Therefore the bottom line is this, either live with the legislation we have or try and change it, "for the benefit of all".

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
allo allo wrote:
Crawley is a delimited Borough and HC numbers have gone from 79 to 104 in the last 2 years. But it is PH numbers that are really out of control and that is even with a knowledge and DSA TaxiDrivers test to pass as well as the usual CRB and Medical.

Are you saying that de-limitation leads to more PH? :?

I'm of the opinion in many places it leads to the reverse.

But surely the expansion of the airport has a lot to do with any PH expansion, and if their were too many why on earth are those baddies from Mole Valley coming in? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 253
Location: Crawley
JD wrote:
allo allo wrote:
The reason is simply that without some control you end up with an over supply which simply drives down fares and pushes up the number of hours drivers work just to earn a reasonable living.


So what controls do you propose?
I propose limiting the numbers of HC at a much higher level than now and getting rid of PH

Quote:
If you work 37.5 hrs as a typical Office worker does then you'll be on the breadline. Even doing 45-50 hours as most of us at least do is no use these days.


I don't think anyone has twisted your arm to drive a taxi, have they?

That is no excuse for poor returns or working conditions
What is it you actually want in respect of restrictions and why? See above, details to be decided locally And how would these restrictions be implemented?

Quote:
If there was no control over the number of supermarkets


So its the competition you don't like but I suppose competition was alright before you entered the taxi trade? I had no view on this until relatively recently and it's not competition, it's oversupply I object to However since you have entered the trade you are now of the opinion that you don't like the number of cabs competing for the limited number of jobs?

Quote:
Every company employs the correct number of workers for it's workload. The taxi business should be no different.


I'm afraid the local council is not a company and the comparison is far removed from reality.Don't you realise you are comparing apples to housebricks, the council's job would remain the same but we would have a new regime within which it would operate A councils job is to issue licenses but perhaps under your scenario the council instead of having a discression under section 16 to limit limiting hackney carriage proprietor licenses, they should also have a discretion to limit hackney carriage driver licenses and only issue proprietor licenses to a person who intends to drive their own vehicle and restrict vehicle licenses to one per person? That would have an effect on supply and demand wouldn't it? I think I already suggested only one plate per driver and he could rent it out to up to 3 more drivers

Quote:
I have changed my mind about the principle, however I'm not sure what the best way or the correct levels should be and I think PH should be limited as well.


When you do find the best way and what you think the correct levels should be, let us know, i'm sure it will make interesting reading?

How do you propose to limit private hire competition? Please see above this is an ongoing work

Quote:
Maybe 50% of a town's PH should become HC as well as the HC already in place then there should be a cap on level, but maybe only HC that are independent (ie NOT on a radio circuit should be allowed to pick up from ranks). Then PH should be abolished! Remaining HC drivers could work on circuits and pick up if approached on the street.


How would your new legislation read?
If I were clever enough to write legislation I wouldn't be a Cabbie(PH). I would leave the actual drafting to real expert lawyers not rank lawyers like us

Quote:
I haven't thought all this through ... I am making it up as I type but


From your comments above I would aggree with you and draw the conclusion that you haven't put much thought into what you are saying?
True. True, but I do have other things in my life, such as working 60 hours a week to earn a basic living which is what you seem to prefer us to do. Are you a Cabbie?

The one thing that stands out in your post is that you don't like competition so you want it restricted. Only fair competition not ridiculous oversupply You don't want anyone else to own or drive a Taxi in your area. I didn't say that please don't put words in my mouth It would appear the only solution you offer is for a council to limit proprietor licenses, yet we are already at that position in 2007.

Your post on deregulation of numbers or delimitation whatever you want to call it, is not unique. We have hundreds of them on TDO and obviously some have more substance than others but not surprisingly they all center on one thing, quantity controls. I think if anyone is to carry the argument forward in respect of controls no matter what those controls might be then they should think about what they wan't and how it can be implemented? Especially when you have to take into account that we already have legislation in place that dictates how licenses are issued.

Therefore the bottom line is this, either live with the legislation we have or try and change it, "for the benefit of all".
Yes thank you I am trying to that with the e-petition to No10 asking for new laws.

Regards

JD


I have an open mind on this, I used to be a delimiter but I have been persuaded by the arguments on here and elsewhere that quantity controls are right, though I think there needs to be a radical change in methods and numbers. I have given this some consideration but not a full investigation as the DfT might mount. Maybe what I'm suggesting is more of a half-way house than the current yes/no debate. Think about it.

ps if there are hundreds of posts about limiting numbers have you ever thought they might just be right?

_________________
Our safety is Paramount


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 253
Location: Crawley
Sussex wrote:
allo allo wrote:
Crawley is a delimited Borough and HC numbers have gone from 79 to 104 in the last 2 years. But it is PH numbers that are really out of control and that is even with a knowledge and DSA TaxiDrivers test to pass as well as the usual CRB and Medical.

Are you saying that de-limitation leads to more PH? :?

NO I'M SAYING IT IS DUE TO OPERATORS DISHING OUT LETTERS TO PROSPECTIVE NEW DRIVERS CONFIRMING THEY WILL TAKE THEM ON THUS ALLOWING THE COUNCIL TO GIVE THEM A BADGE ONCE THEY HAVE PASSED THE VARIOUS CRITERIA

I'm of the opinion in many places it leads to the reverse.

YOU'RE MOST LIKELY CORRECT BUT WE HAVE SEEN A MASSIVE INFLUX OVER AND ABOVE THE DRIFT FROM PH TO HC

But surely the expansion of the airport has a lot to do with any PH expansion, and if their were too many why on earth are those baddies from Mole Valley coming in? :?


THE AIRPORT IS A CLOSED SHOP.
THE MOLE VALLEY DRIVERS COMING IN IS DOWN TO CERTAIN OPERATORS TAKING ON MV DRIVERS AS THEY COULD GET THEM QUICKER THAN CRAWLEY PH DRIVERS AS MOLE VALLEY DONT DO KNOWLEDGE OR DSA TAXI DRIVER TESTS. ie IT WAS OPERATOR GREED THAT DROVE IT

_________________
Our safety is Paramount


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
allo allo wrote:
THE AIRPORT IS A CLOSED SHOP.

Don't you shout at me. [-X

The fact that it is a closed shop is irrelavant, they still use licensed PH. Which is why PH numbers have risen. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
allo allo wrote:
Crawley is a delimited Borough and HC numbers have gone from 79 to 104 in the last 2 years. But it is PH numbers that are really out of control and that is even with a knowledge and DSA TaxiDrivers test to pass as well as the usual CRB and Medical.


It might be advisable to ask the council to raise the quality control bar.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 253
Location: Crawley
Sussex wrote:
allo allo wrote:
THE AIRPORT IS A CLOSED SHOP.

Don't you shout at me. [-X

The fact that it is a closed shop is irrelavant, they still use licensed PH. Which is why PH numbers have risen. :?


YEH SORRY FOR SHOUTING BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW TO SPLIT UP A POST INTO LITTLE BITS FOR REPLYING TO EACH BIT INDIVIDUALLY.
AS I'D USED COLOUR IN MY REPLY TO JD I THOUGHT I WOULD CHANGE TO CAPS FOR YOUR REPLY.
:D

However it is not growth in airport PH numbers that has happened, they are static. It's the town lot that have got out of hand.

_________________
Our safety is Paramount


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 253
Location: Crawley
JD wrote:
allo allo wrote:
Crawley is a delimited Borough and HC numbers have gone from 79 to 104 in the last 2 years. But it is PH numbers that are really out of control and that is even with a knowledge and DSA TaxiDrivers test to pass as well as the usual CRB and Medical.


It might be advisable to ask the council to raise the quality control bar.

Regards

JD


I presume you mean Mole Valley Council, we have been putting a lot of pressure on them as have the councils at Crawley and Reigate & Banstead which is even more badly affected than we are.

However I can report a degree of success.
MV are introducing a Knowledge test and I understand are going to stop Licensing PH Operators outside their own "controlled district".

_________________
Our safety is Paramount


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
How anyone can suggest that we can operate in any free market when there are so many restrictions through legislation is beyond me.

I'm renting a car next week, and I phoned Hertz ................... you wouldn't believe this but they want more for a E class Merc than they do for a Vauxhall Astra ................ imagine what they would have said if I'd said but why do you want more money for the Merc .................. I'm not doing any more miles in it than I would in the Astra.

As far as the "plate baron" issue goes ..................... a mate of mine has rented a car off the same bloke for 5 years .................... he pays £150 a week all in for a 24 hours, the car in question is a Vauxhall Vectra and its engine blew up on Thursday. The car was taken to the garage and a reconditioned unit was ordered, it cost £900 and will cost £350 to fit. Rather than seeing my mate off the road he gave up his own car while the Vectra is in the garage, my mate will see no difference in his takings.

What would have happened if my mate had owned the car?

Off work for maybe just over a week .................... no earnings ................ and a £1250 garage bill to pay.

What happens to the so called "plate baron"?

He is off work until the car is fixed, his driver is happy and will stay with him ........................ he recovers his lost weekly takings from the profit he has made from his 2 rented plates.

I know not all plate holders are so inclined ..................... but should these three blokes be stopped from helping each other ............... and should others like them?

We need our industry to be controlled ...................... and this should be done through MORE restrictions and not less.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:31 pm
Posts: 1761
Location: Commonsense Country
JD wrote:
allo allo wrote:
Crawley is a delimited Borough and HC numbers have gone from 79 to 104 in the last 2 years. But it is PH numbers that are really out of control and that is even with a knowledge and DSA TaxiDrivers test to pass as well as the usual CRB and Medical.


It might be advisable to ask the council to raise the quality control bar.

Regards

JD


But how can the quality be raised if the drivers aren't making enough money to achieve them.

That request should be accompanied by a promise of a numbers restriction.

B. Lucky :D

_________________
"Here's a simple solution. If you don't want to pay more for a premium service then wait in the queue, problem solved".
Skull on TDO

TF pi$$ed on his chips.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
GA wrote:
But how can the quality be raised if the drivers aren't making enough money to achieve them.

That request should be accompanied by a promise of a numbers restriction.


I was under the impression obtaining a drivers license came after the issue of quality examination. There wouldn't be much point in a quality controlled entry system if you issued the license first and took the quality control tests second.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
allo allo wrote:
I presume you mean Mole Valley Council, we have been putting a lot of pressure on them as have the councils at Crawley and Reigate & Banstead which is even more badly affected than we are.

However I can report a degree of success.

MV are introducing a Knowledge test


Well of course the knowledge test in MV is down to MV and them alone.

Quote:
and I understand they are going to stop Licensing PH Operators outside their own "controlled district".


Wasn't this the major problem to begin with? Does this mean they are going to revoke the license of the one existing private hire operator in Crawley, or is it to remain? If they don't, then the situation hasn't changed.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
allo allo wrote:
I propose limiting the numbers of HC at a much higher level than now and getting rid of PH


And how do you propose to do that when DfT best practice is to remove restrictions?

Quote:
That is no excuse for poor returns or working conditions


So you blame the council for your poor returns and working conditions. Just exactly what working conditions are the council obliged to provide and how can the council be held responsible for your poor returns? Are you suggesting the council owes you a duty of care to provide you with a living?

Quote:
I had no view on this until relatively recently and it's not competition, its oversupply I object to


Let me guess, you think you should be the one who dictates the taxi licensing policy of Crawley council? Just how many vehicles would you license under the circumstances? If I were a councillor and you came to me and said I can’t make a living as a cab driver, I would put my arm around you and say look Mr Allo, no one forces you to drive a cab, the first priority of this council is to the public, therefore I suggest you choose a profession that will provide you with the level of income to which you are accustomed. That may seem harsh to you but it’s the reality of the world we live in and you only have to see that by the response from the representatives of the various councils in the north East.

Just because you drive a cab and have done for some considerable time you think the council owes you a living. The reality of the situation is that they don’t.

You want future competition restricted and the councils current policy of a level playing field dispensed with to suit you. It is your intention to make the playing field lopsided in your favour by restricting entry thereofre at the same time restricting competition for custom. You have a new soundbyte for competition called "oversupply."

I think we can all associate ourselves with the word oversupply but in the main the word is normally associasted with those areas like your own that are derestricted. However even though we all understand the effects of delimitation, if delimitation is done right and with real tough quality controls then oversupply should not present itself as a problem.

Quote:
you realise you are comparing apples to house bricks, the council's job would remain the same but we would have a new regime within which it would operate


I was comparing your analogy of a company who employs people with that of an administrative body. For the purpose of employment the two are as different as chalk and cheese.

Quote:
I think I already suggested only one plate per driver and he could rent it out to up to 3 more drivers


You better put some meat on the bones of this idea because it’s more than a little ambiguous. Are you suggesting that people who don’t drive their own vehicle shouldn’t be allowed to hold a proprietor license? What about transfer of license? Is it your intention to have a clause in future legislation that states licenses are non transferable.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 146 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 688 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group