Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2025 11:23 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56830
Location: 1066 Country
I know the heart is in the right place, so 10 out of 10 for that.

But will it really work? :?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6270318.stm

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Sussex wrote:
I know the heart is in the right place, so 10 out of 10 for that.

But will it really work? :?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6270318.stm


It might work but it sure would be a lot of extra work for all concerned so under those circumstances it might be a little too complicated as was pointed out by the police.

The police comments about CCTV are interesting and it would seem from previous utterings from these quarters that practically most if not all forces are in favour of CCTV. Combined with the opinion of the DfT these two bodies make a powerful ally for the mandatory option of owners installing their own cctv.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
'The chairman of one of the biggest taxi associations says he hears stories like that every week. So Steve Wright...'

He may be a few things, but he's not that.

Interesting they never took any quotes from old Flanaguff.
I can't imagine why? :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56830
Location: 1066 Country
GBC wrote:
He may be a few things, but he's not that.

TBH it wouldn't be a bad thing for your side of the trade if he was. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
It would help protect drivers in theory, but I can't see many firms adopting it because it would deter a lot of one-off bookings.

And it would be for the trade to implement, whereas reading the article it sounds like it's a government thing:

"[The GMB and Steve Wright] are in talks with the Mayor of London Ken Livingstone to have the scheme trialled in the capital, with plans to extend to the rest of the country if it is a success."

I can't see the relevance of the Mayor, except if it's going to be compulsory, but that ain't gonna happen.

Any firm taking bookings could implement safeguards of the type mentioned if they wanted, but for obvious reasons they haven't (perhaps that's one reason why the Pink Ladies went belly up).

And, of course, the article is clearly talking about the private and public hire trades, but the safeguards would have no relevance to public hire.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Sussex wrote:
GBC wrote:
He may be a few things, but he's not that.

TBH it wouldn't be a bad thing for your side of the trade if he was. :wink:


Having Terry on the opposition is good enough for us. \:D/


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 146 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group