Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Apr 26, 2026 10:29 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:35 pm 
diesel wrote:
"An application is exactly that and it has to be "considered" according to the terms of section 3.1. The "consideration" carries a statutory time frame for determination and "only under exceptional circumstances should that time frame be extended."
where in the document was this? i've searched but can't find it


Thing is that there are two issues here. One is the way the council conducted itself over the applications given up by the courts, and they're still behaving as reprehensibly, and the second is the matter of de-restriction.

Bringing these two together is merely to put some meat on the bone for the councillors. To let them believe that there is some degree of justification for the action the council is now forced to take.

But, don't we all know that this is just nonsense. The two are substantially unrelated. The council is being forced into this new course of action because it is being dragged through the courts. My case for instance, highlights how the council used inadequate information to deny my licence - set against a background of unprecedented economic growth for all transport service types - how they exercised their discretion unreasonably, and how they've acted contrary to natural justice in the process.

Imagine a council admitting it broke the rules of justice? That's why I will be seeking a deemed grant from the Sheriff. That's why they will be granting licences while the policy is not to. That's why others will apply. That's why the current policy has been broken.

Now, they can seek to institute a "robust" survey regime to restrict licences. But, whatever they come up with, they will be back in court. Because we know it will still be the same old contrived rubbish and we will keep applying until the council's conduct is scrutinised by the justiciary, supported by councillors taking the witness box. Imagine what we will discover about council actions under oath? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Those who have perpetrated this scam are heading towards serious accountability. Hopefully careers, political and non-political, will come under scrutiny and be brought to the ignominious end they deserve.

I suspect that all the latest meanderings about getting reports and considering options is just a red herring. The council know already what they're going to do. They're just feeding scraps to the saps so it is not a surprise when it hits them.

This is what councils always do. Always have done.

As the Scouts say, be prepared.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
jasbar wrote:
diesel wrote:
"An application is exactly that and it has to be "considered" according to the terms of section 3.1. The "consideration" carries a statutory time frame for determination and "only under exceptional circumstances should that time frame be extended."
where in the document was this? i've searched but can't find it


Thing is that there are two issues here. One is the way the council conducted itself over the applications given up by the courts, and they're still behaving as reprehensibly, and the second is the matter of de-restriction.

Bringing these two together is merely to put some meat on the bone for the councillors. To let them believe that there is some degree of justification for the action the council is now forced to take.

But, don't we all know that this is just nonsense. The two are substantially unrelated. The council is being forced into this new course of action because it is being dragged through the courts. My case for instance, highlights how the council used inadequate information to deny my licence - set against a background of unprecedented economic growth for all transport service types - how they exercised their discretion unreasonably, and how they've acted contrary to natural justice in the process.

Imagine a council admitting it broke the rules of justice? That's why I will be seeking a deemed grant from the Sheriff. That's why they will be granting licences while the policy is not to. That's why others will apply. That's why the current policy has been broken.

Now, they can seek to institute a "robust" survey regime to restrict licences. But, whatever they come up with, they will be back in court. Because we know it will still be the same old contrived rubbish and we will keep applying until the council's conduct is scrutinised by the justiciary, supported by councillors taking the witness box. Imagine what we will discover about council actions under oath? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Those who have perpetrated this scam are heading towards serious accountability. Hopefully careers, political and non-political, will come under scrutiny and be brought to the ignominious end they deserve.

I suspect that all the latest meanderings about getting reports and considering options is just a red herring. The council know already what they're going to do. They're just feeding scraps to the saps so it is not a surprise when it hits them.

This is what councils always do. Always have done.

As the Scouts say, be prepared.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


And, as the SKULL says - apply apply apply

:wink:

_________________
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
George Orwell, "Animal Farm"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
One thing I did notice and that the council are saying surveys should take place every three years in line with English best practise.

I would have thought they would have taken more notice of the two year limit placed on surveys by the Scottish courts.

Or have I missed something? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Sussex wrote:
One thing I did notice and that the council are saying surveys should take place every three years in line with English best practise.

I would have thought they would have taken more notice of the two year limit placed on surveys by the Scottish courts.

Or have I missed something? :?
I must have missed it as well then. Or maybe CEC have.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:41 pm
Posts: 260
Location: Edinburgh
Tomorrow will dawn with the news that the council will not de-restrict for the foreseable future. the only information I have at the moment is that this decision got cross party support.

Not what Taylor and co want to hear !!

I go to my bed now with my central pyjamas, with my central mug of cocoa and a big f**king smile on my face !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
Ross wrote:
Tomorrow will dawn with the news that the council will not de-restrict for the foreseable future. the only information I have at the moment is that this decision got cross party support.

Then why bother with the consultation document? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Sussex wrote:
Ross wrote:
Tomorrow will dawn with the news that the council will not de-restrict for the foreseable future. the only information I have at the moment is that this decision got cross party support.

Then why bother with the consultation document? :?


Maybe it is just to piiss you off... :lol:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57333
Location: 1066 Country
MR T wrote:
Maybe it is just to piiss you off... :lol:

I would be honoured if that were the case. 8-[

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
Maybe it is just to piiss you off... :lol:
I would be honoured if that were the case. 8-[

:lol: :lol:

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
Ross wrote:
Tomorrow will dawn with the news that the council will not de-restrict for the foreseable future. the only information I have at the moment is that this decision got cross party support.

Not what Taylor and co want to hear !!

I go to my bed now with my central pyjamas, with my central mug of cocoa and a big f**king smile on my face !!

yes! youre correct ross :lol:
the council will probably try to operate a restricted system but if you apply they will have to grant, while thier policy says they shouldnt, strange one that eh
well as long as they fool most of the people most of the time eh!
im sure thiers a profit in there somewhere :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
any one want to buy a metrocab newly plated in edinburgh :lol:
had a valuation done cab worth £45k shiny plastic plate worth feck all :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 12:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
oh i forgot to say i can supply a driver (me) ill give you a tun a week
for 6 shifts and i take 8 weeks holiday a year


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
ALI T wrote:
oh i forgot to say i can supply a driver (me) ill give you a tun a week
for 6 shifts and i take 8 weeks holiday a year


Welcome back Ali?

You made a lot of people who disliked the idea of you applying for a license, "eat their words". I suspect they look pretty foolish now?

Is there anything you would like to say to them now? lol. Besides the obvious?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
thanks jd
nice to be back online
its amazing what you can do whith £260 a week when youre not paying a taxi baron a rental :lol:
are none of the detractors gonna ask the question, you know the "got youre plate yet ali" :lol:
or the one about how much it costs to buy and run a vehicle in edinburgh ?
i can now answer all these questions for them with proof if they like.
i think even they will be surprised
:lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
ha nothing changes eh!
gladstones in a huff again what a prat
oh btw alan that vintage vehicle that i put on(1999 metro)you know the one you sniped at that i wouldnt get it through its test.
a strange comment from a guy who drives a 2000 plate heap of [edited by admin] .
and there was no probs at the cab office test you see i know who they work for when they conduct test, and i know what is required and what standards they have to adhere to and i know my way round a vehicle.
of course they did try to treat me the same way as they treat the likes of you
i made a few enquiries and went up to collect the free plate a few days later.
the cockey mechanic couldnt even look at me :lol:
see you on the ranks alan :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 598 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group