Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 12:53 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 304 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 21  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 8:26 pm
Posts: 8529
kermit2482 wrote:
JD wrote:
Mr S6 conversion specialist.

Summons to appear at Manchester Magistrates court, Crown Square Manchester to answer the charge laid before this court that on the 28th Day of August 2007 you did allow to be used on a road called [TDO ROAD], a certain public service vehicle, namely [registration number XYZ 123] for the purpose of carrying passengers for hire or reward, in respect of which you did not have a public service vehicle operator's licence granted under the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981, Pt II, contrary to the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981, s12(1) and (5).

_______________________


Now you have lost the plot MR JD :lol:


Actually for JD that was quite inventive, Marks out of 10 a very respectable 8..

_________________
Justice for the 96. It has only taken 27 years...........repeat the same lies for 27 years and the truth sounds strange to people!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
kermit2482 wrote:
JD wrote:
Mr S6 conversion specialist.

Summons to appear at Manchester Magistrates court, Crown Square Manchester to answer the charge laid before this court that on the 28th Day of August 2007 you did allow to be used on a road called [TDO ROAD], a certain public service vehicle, namely [registration number XYZ 123] for the purpose of carrying passengers for hire or reward, in respect of which you did not have a public service vehicle operator's licence granted under the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981, Pt II, contrary to the Public Passenger Vehicles Act 1981, s12(1) and (5).

_______________________


Now you have lost the plot MR JD :lol:


lol, I thought it was quite amusing lol.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 111
Location: MIDLANDS
It would be if i operated limousines :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:56 pm
Posts: 7
Quote:
S6 Conversion specialist.It would be if i operated limousines



You sold all yours as you knew the s~it was going to hit the fan 2009.

The Midlands must really proud to have a specialist like you to work on there limousines. With people like you make the limousine industry look like a complete bunch of cowboys. The taxi drivers/P/H limousine operators can see right though you when well you learn to say nothing.

Less said is more gained

By the way are you the limousine repair shop in the Midlands that was making coke can exhausts, as there cant that many S-6 specialist in the Midlands. The man who sold an Converted S-6 Limousine within a week or two got a GB9. On 9 or 10 points but you will put us right on this, as you are so honest. With all your business practices & scams or cons want ever you would like to call them?


Limo Man


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 10:58 am
Posts: 43
Location: Deal Kent
limo man wrote:
Quote:
S6 Conversion specialist.It would be if i operated limousines



You sold all yours as you knew the s~it was going to hit the fan 2009.

The Midlands must really proud to have a specialist like you to work on there limousines. With people like you make the limousine industry look like a complete bunch of cowboys. The taxi drivers/P/H limousine operators can see right though you when well you learn to say nothing.

Less said is more gained

By the way are you the limousine repair shop in the Midlands that was making coke can exhausts, as there cant that many S-6 specialist in the Midlands. The man who sold an Converted S-6 Limousine within a week or two got a GB9. On 9 or 10 points but you will put us right on this, as you are so honest. With all your business practices & scams or cons want ever you would like to call them?


Limo Man


For sale 12000 empty coke cans, Get in quick, there is a bloke from a well known limo w/shop intrested in the whole lot. God knows what he wants them for :?:

i wonder if the floor pans in some of these vehicles has Duckhams written on it? :lol: :lol: :lol:

HI HO SILVER AWAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

_________________
Oi ! get back to work


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:32 pm
Posts: 552
Location: london/croydon
I know that copper said alot of these limos are run by coke dealers BUT I did not think he meant coke can dealers.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
IT'S THE REAL THING!

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
I must be missing the point here, yet again.

But one thing that I can't quite work out is how any converters manage to get the stretch hummer weight under the 3.5 tonne limit.

Especially when you add the telly, the fridge, the booze etc etc. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:
I must be missing the point here, yet again.

But one thing that I can't quite work out is how any converters manage to get the stretch hummer weight under the 3.5 tonne limit.

Especially when you add the telly, the fridge, the booze etc etc. :?


You really do need educating a lot. To get the weight under 3.5 tons you put smaller brakes on the vehicle, remove the exhaust, drill some holes in the chassis, a few other minor mods like this and hey presto. :lol:

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:32 pm
Posts: 552
Location: london/croydon
Quote:
Especially when you add the telly, the fridge, the booze etc etc.

Dont forget the extra big heads and large egos :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
You really do need educating a lot.

That's why I asked the f***ing question.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Sussex wrote:
I must be missing the point here, yet again.

But one thing that I can't quite work out is how any converters manage to get the stretch hummer weight under the 3.5 tonne limit.

Especially when you add the telly, the fridge, the booze etc etc. :?


The answers have already been posted :lol: :lol: :lol:


Quote:
coke can exhausts..........

...........i wonder if the floor pans in some of these vehicles has Duckhams written on it?

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:
grandad wrote:
You really do need educating a lot.

That's why I asked the f***ing question.


Temper temper.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 5:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
grandad wrote:
Sussex wrote:
grandad wrote:
The cost of the driver is NOT included in the hire if the company is operating the system correctly.

But the driver is being paid to take folks from A to B.

Which part of that is not 'hire and reward'? :?


FFS the driver is employed by the person hiring the vehicle and not provided by the company providing the vehicle. This has been gone through so many times before and is perfectly legal.


I'm wondering if you understand the meaning of employment? Paying someone to drive a vehicle is not employment. A service is being provided for payment and employment does not remotely fit the task.

I would like to know if the vehicle owner placed any restrictions on the driver in the way the vehicle was driven for example speed or where the vehicle might go?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
JD wrote:
grandad wrote:
Sussex wrote:
grandad wrote:
The cost of the driver is NOT included in the hire if the company is operating the system correctly.

But the driver is being paid to take folks from A to B.

Which part of that is not 'hire and reward'? :?


FFS the driver is employed by the person hiring the vehicle and not provided by the company providing the vehicle. This has been gone through so many times before and is perfectly legal.


I'm wondering if you understand the meaning of employment? Paying someone to drive a vehicle is not employment. A service is being provided for payment and employment does not remotely fit the task.

I would like to know if the vehicle owner placed any restrictions on the driver in the way the vehicle was driven for example speed or where the vehicle might go?

Regards

JD


Just a guess but I would assume that the driver would always drive within the speed limits applicable to the vehicle and road. I would guess that the driver would go where the person who hired the vehicle asked him to go subject to the vehicle being able to access the particular area. For example he would not be able to go into a multi storey car park or McDonalds drivethrough.
I suspect that the reason for asking this particular question has more to do with establishing who is actually employing the driver.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 304 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 21  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerberus and 313 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group