Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 8:28 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
grandad wrote:
JD wrote:
grandad wrote:
Does this part of "THE ROAD TRAFFIC ACT" refer to your drivers license or to the license issued by the LA to taxi and private hire drivers?

Does this act cover council licenses?


In conjuction with committing any offence it would apply. It certainly covers offences relating to hire or reward in respect of all Taxi licensing legislation and indeed it is backed up with case law, which of course can be found on TDO, if you have the time to search?

I suggest you consult a solicitor if you require information on any other driver license matters.

Regards

JD


But I thought that you knew the answer to this. You are far cheaper than a solisitor. :D


I have told you the position in respect of Taxi legislation and the two sections of the Road traffic act posted above speak for themselves. if you cannot interpret their simple meaning then what chance have you go of interpreting any form of legislation?

It says no person shall drive a vehicle without an appropriate license. thats simple isn't it?

It also says it is an offence permit a person to drive on a road of vehicle of a permitted class where no license exists.

Thats simple as well, isn't it?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
JD wrote:
It also says it is an offence permit a person to drive on a road of vehicle of a permitted class where no license exists.

Thats simple as well, isn't it?

But JD they have had some mythical transport barrister telling them everything is pukka. :^o

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
JD wrote:
grandad wrote:
JD wrote:
grandad wrote:
Does this part of "THE ROAD TRAFFIC ACT" refer to your drivers license or to the license issued by the LA to taxi and private hire drivers?

Does this act cover council licenses?


In conjuction with committing any offence it would apply. It certainly covers offences relating to hire or reward in respect of all Taxi licensing legislation and indeed it is backed up with case law, which of course can be found on TDO, if you have the time to search?

I suggest you consult a solicitor if you require information on any other driver license matters.

Regards

JD


But I thought that you knew the answer to this. You are far cheaper than a solisitor. :D


I have told you the position in respect of Taxi legislation and the two sections of the Road traffic act posted above speak for themselves. if you cannot interpret their simple meaning then what chance have you go of interpreting any form of legislation?

It says no person shall drive a vehicle without an appropriate license. thats simple isn't it?

It also says it is an offence permit a person to drive on a road of vehicle of a permitted class where no license exists.

Thats simple as well, isn't it?

Regards

JD


That is not what the paragraph says at all. You have changed it to suit your view. As I read this bit of the law it is refering to a persons driving license not a council badge.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
grandad wrote:
That is not what the paragraph says at all. You have changed it to suit your view. As I read this bit of the law it is refering to a persons driving license not a council badge.


I gave you condensed simplistic version of what the section means, considering you appear not to understand it.

How big a picture would you like me to draw? If you don't understand the offence in both clauses just say so, we can then try to accomodate your lack of comprehension.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
"none so blind as those who will not see"

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 111
Location: MIDLANDS
The word INTERPRET is very dangerous !

It causes more problems within law than any other word .

Simply because its 1 persons reading and not BLACK LETTER LAW (which usually has a totally different, precise and exact explanation of the law.)

Many Eu Directives presently floating around the net are wrong because they are interpretted, if you look at the title of most it will say INTERPRETATION of etc etc.

Speak to VOSA they will be more than happy to explain how these interpretations are causing a lot of confusion. They have to go by original Documents not INTERPRETATIONS.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
S6 Conversion specialist. wrote:
Speak to VOSA they will be more than happy to explain how these interpretations are causing a lot of confusion. They have to go by original Documents not INTERPRETATIONS.

I'm not saying I have spoken to as many VOSA folks as you, but the ones I have spoke to have been completely useless.

All bar one bloke in Southampton who approves single type small bikes.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2003 9:39 am
Posts: 400
Location: Manchester Airport
Sussex wrote:
S6 Conversion specialist. wrote:
Speak to VOSA they will be more than happy to explain how these interpretations are causing a lot of confusion. They have to go by original Documents not INTERPRETATIONS.

I'm not saying I have spoken to as many VOSA folks as you, but the ones I have spoke to have been completely useless.

All bar one bloke in Southampton who approves single type small bikes.


And that is the BIG problem across the UK, each one has a different view

_________________
you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57347
Location: 1066 Country
Tulsablue wrote:
And that is the BIG problem across the UK, each one has a different view

Mainly because limo folks are using PSV regs to run as PH.

Councils are far from perfect, but illegal plying or booking is as illegal in Newcastle as it is in Plymouth.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 250 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group