Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 12:57 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Renfrewshire guest
PostPosted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 12:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:45 pm
Posts: 62
Location: Perth Scotland
Anonymous wrote:
Cannot remember where it was ,but noticed PH,had a notice on
the side of the cab,saying that only pre-booked customers were allowed to be carried in the vehicle,and if not,the customer,was not insured.
Thought this was a good idea.



Try Pert & Kinross If advertising appears on the vehicle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 12:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 8:45 pm
Posts: 62
Location: Perth Scotland
Anonymous wrote:
Aren't all the arguments about plating PHV's just nonsense, a distracting side issue to the real one.

Why do we need two licensing systems. It just adds to confusion. The old days where private hire licences were intended to be for chauffeur driven hires, ie limousines, wedding and funerals etc. have long since gone. For the main part, aren't they just operating in the same way as taxis do, except they don't pick up from the street (At least they're not supposed to)?

And, aren't the traditional taxi services also mainly operating like private hire, contributing to the problems of customers having difficulty hailing from the street at peak times, infuriated by seeing empty taxis passing them by hurrying to fulfill a private hire?

This is crazy.

Wouldn't the OFT have served us better, and our customers, by resolving this dilemma?

Why not a single tier public carriage service coupled with flexibility of vehicle types to cover all licensed hire requirements?

Easy for the regulating licensing authorities, easier for those who work within the industry and much easier for the public to understand, possibly even encouraging greater use of our service, which we all want.

And, also much safer for everyone involved.

The current system suffers from the classic british disease of being designed by a committee.

Isn't it time for common sense to prevail?????

:roll:

Jimbo




The 1866 Burgh Police act refers to 'General' & 'Private' Hackney carraiges long before Chauffeur cars were a concept


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: phcs and taxi regulation
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 12:45 pm 
Deregulation would be a disaster. It was tried in Dublin and caused an almost total collapse of the system.
The system in Edinburgh generally works well. Little organised crime running phcs like in Glasgow where phcs can be a front for money laundering (forcing fares down) and drug dealing; few sexual assaults by perverts who see opportunities to pick up and rape drunk women as is the case in London where an estimated quarter of all sexual assaults in the city are committed by "gypsy cab" drivers.
The system in Edinburgh works. If private hire drivers want to be taxi drivers let the put in the time and effort to sit The Knowledge and not by slipping in through the back door.
As Kenny MacAskill said in his article in the Evening News "If it ain`t broke , don`t fix it".


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 4:05 pm 
Anonymous wrote:
Get rid of quotas. Possibly.

Compare taxi licensing with pub licensing.

In the case of pubs, the LA issues the license then substantially leaves the licensed trade to deliver the service to customers. And they stand or fall on the quality of that service.

With taxis however, the LAs issue licences, then proceed to act as if they own the taxi fleet.

They set prices.
They police the trade to the point of harrassment.
They set up disciplinary procedures that make the Spanish Inquisition look like a cheap gameshow.
They limit the number of licences.
They tell cabbies what they should wear to work.
They dictate the maximum age that a vehicle should be used.
They dictate that cabbies should attend a training course of their design (brown envelopes to their pals?).

Can you imagine the licensed trade allowing them to get away with all this nonsense, and more?

We need standards, yes. But the way that LAs are currently behaving is outrageous. They don't make the investment in the trade. Self-employed owners and drivers do. The council doesn't employ these people. They don't provide NI, SSP, pension, holidays or any of the other benefits associated with employment. So why should they "run" the trade as if they owned it?

Isn't it time for them to butt out and let those who deliver the service design how it is delivered?

Jimbo


Jimbo.
One thing I hate to see on these forums is the brown envelope allegation regularly put in by people.

I f you dont understand something a brown everlope can be the only answer.

the reason it all has to be written down for taxi and private hire drivers is, unlike a pub the driver is too often alone with the punter.

now the other thing is councils must be reasonable, and most council rules are not, so when someone points the law out the council has to back down thats it in a nutshell.

Geoff


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 4:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Roselyn wrote:
The system in Edinburgh works. If private hire drivers want to be taxi drivers let the put in the time and effort to sit The Knowledge and not by slipping in through the back door.
As Kenny MacAskill said in his article in the Evening News "If it ain`t broke , don`t fix it".


Roselyn, I couldn't agree more about PH drivers doing the taxi knowledge, if they wish to be taxi drivers.

However do you agree with me, that when they do, they should be given taxi vehicle licenses, instead of having to drive someone else's vehicle? :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: reply to Sussex man
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 5:19 pm 
I don`t agree. Taxi numbers should be limited and councils should not issue licences willy nilly. However I do believe they should only be given to qualified taxi drivers.
In Edinburgh black taxis can only be driven by qualified drivers. PHCs can be driven by anyone with a driving licence and with minimal vetting. That is not to say that most Edinburgh PHC drivers are unprofessional or crooked but they are not black cab drivers.There are also "dodgy elements" amongst them. A few years ago a young woman was raped in the city by a PHC driver in his cab after booking the cab in the normal way. During the police investigation, the company involved was unable (or more likely unwilling)to name the driver it had despatched.
I shudder to think what the situation will be like if such drivers and such companies are allowed to operate with external plates,illegally picking up drunk teenagers from the side of the road. Lets face it, picking up illegally is the real reason why the PHC companies and drivers want external plating in Edinburgh!
As I said before,let them pass the Knowledge and drive a black cab if they want to pick up from the side of the road and use the taxi/bus lanes. Let`s do our best to keep the city safe for vulnerable women at night.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: de regulation
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 5:55 pm 
De-regulation!!!!? Don`t make me laugh!!!! In 2001 there were 233 sexual assaults in unregistered "cabs" in the de-regulated City of London. De-regulation means handing the system over to perverts and cowboys. Lets have MORE regulation so that only serious,reliable and professional taxi drivers are driving our citizens around our towns and cities!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: reply to Sussex man
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Roselyn wrote:
I don`t agree. Taxi numbers should be limited and councils should not issue licences willy nilly. However I do believe they should only be given to qualified taxi drivers.
In Edinburgh black taxis can only be driven by qualified drivers. PHCs can be driven by anyone with a driving licence and with minimal vetting. That is not to say that most Edinburgh PHC drivers are unprofessional or crooked but they are not black cab drivers.


See that's why Edinburgh has the 'too many taxis, not enough drivers' situation, if new drivers have no other option than to drive someone else's taxi.

As for minimal vetting, if PHs are checked differently than taxi drivers, then the council is not doing it's job.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: de regulation
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Roselyn wrote:
De-regulation!!!!? Don`t make me laugh!!!! In 2001 there were 233 sexual assaults in unregistered "cabs" in the de-regulated City of London. De-regulation means handing the system over to perverts and cowboys. Lets have MORE regulation so that only serious,reliable and professional taxi drivers are driving our citizens around our towns and cities!


Who mentioned de-regulation, to make you laugh?

The unregistered cars in London committed no sexual assaults, it was the unchecked drivers in them, that did.

However London is in the process of licensing PH, as you must know. But in London anyone that does the knowledge can have a taxi vehicle license.

Are they the perverts and cowboys you mention?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: De regulation
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 10:06 pm 
Exactly! London has started dealing with cowboys and perverts by regulating. The way to get a good taxi system is to put in place legislation to get rid of these types and attract professional,"checked"drivers to drive your taxis. Some on this site seem to want a free for all which would no doubt bring in profit to the cowboys but would be detrimental to the overall taxi system and its passengers. Are all you taxi and cab drivers really so blind to all the money launderers and drug dealers who blight the business? Or do you just turn a blind eye?
Somewhere else on this site someone talks of charging below the councils metered price. Sounds good until you realise that anyone laundering money does not need to make a legitimate profit on a taxi business. But in the course of giving the customer cheap fares the legit drivers are forced out of business. It happened in Dublin and has happened for years in Glasgow and Paisley>(Renfrewshire contributor must know this).
Why are some people so afraid of regulation? Do they think councils have a vested interest in undermining their own taxi systems?


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 10:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 9:30 pm
Posts: 990
Location: The Global Market
Oh Fair Roselyn. Please read what is said.

No one is asking for deregulation. No one wants to see any 'Tom, Dick or Harry' role into the industry.

What some of us want is to let anyone who meets the standards set to be able to enter the trade and go about his business legitimately. That means 'De-limitation'. Many of us who want de-limitation would happily see more stringent entry requirements in place.

Perhaps you should be more subjective about the figures you hear and how they are interpreted. Seems to me that Cab Trade News is really the Daily Mail in disguise.

_________________
A member of the Hire or Reward Industry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: De regulation
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Roselyn wrote:
Exactly! London has started dealing with cowboys and perverts by regulating. The way to get a good taxi system is to put in place legislation to get rid of these types and attract professional,"checked"drivers to drive your taxis.


All drivers are checked, the only ones who weren't, but now are being checked, are the London mini-cabs/PH boys and girls.

But we go back to the original point, should all these checked drivers drive their own vehicles, or be forced to drive someone else's.

I happen to believe they should be free to decide themselves.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: De regulation
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Roselyn wrote:
Some on this site seem to want a free for all which would no doubt bring in profit to the cowboys but would be detrimental to the overall taxi system and its passengers. Are all you taxi and cab drivers really so blind to all the money launderers and drug dealers who blight the business? Or do you just turn a blind eye?


Of course no-one should turn a blind eye, but how many times have you complained to the police, or given them evidence of PH wrong doings?

Down here operators have to be licensed, without that they cannot work.
Records have to be kept, and are checked by the powers that be.

Now if you was a drug runner, would you want to keep a record of your drug running?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: De limitation
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 10:52 pm 
Not sure what you mean. Do you mean objective rather than subjective.Never read Cab Trade News nor Daily Mail.
Edinburgh does not have too few taxis : the busy periods are busy here as in any city. Your "de limitation" sounds good but too many taxis and cabs is as damaging as too few in the long term. And those who are in the business for reasons other than legitimately running a taxi business will last longest.
Where does the system run better than in Edinburgh? I know taxi owners and drivers from all over Britain. They are all strong on complaining but light on thoughtful solutions. This is a good site but you have to admit that it throws up more questions than reasoned answers.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: De regulation
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2004 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Roselyn wrote:
Somewhere else on this site someone talks of charging below the councils metered price. Sounds good until you realise that anyone laundering money does not need to make a legitimate profit on a taxi business. But in the course of giving the customer cheap fares the legit drivers are forced out of business. It happened in Dublin and has happened for years in Glasgow and Paisley>(Renfrewshire contributor must know this).


Discounts happen in all trades, and in all parts of this one. Doesn't mean we are all drug runners, just that we are all business people.

Those that discount, are not thick, we may not like it, but do we complain when the diesel is cheaper at Asda. Are they drug runners?

As for Dublin, please don't believe what you read or hear from the scare-mongers. For those people who tried to get a cab prior to sense prevailing, it was a god send.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 719 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group