skippy41 wrote:
What could you do in the situation where by your driving along with the punter and he asks you to pull over, and he starts speaking to the tart and she gets in, and the punter says go to a place, but on your way the police pull you, are you doing anything wrong then, in my book no as your doing what the punter requested.
it seams that all the drivers know what goes on in that area and are forever getting pulled by the police but they still take punters there
The problem you have in that respect is that just because a passenger asks you to break the law it doesn't mean you have to comply with such a request.
What you describe is tantamount to kerb crawling, which is an offence.
Soliciting for the purpose of prostitution.
A person commits an offence if he solicits another person, or different persons, for the purpose of prostitution either from a motor vehicle while it is in a street or public place or in a street or public place while in the immediate vicinity of a motor vehicle that he has just got out of or off, persistently or in such manner or in such circumstances as to be likely to cause annoyance to the person (or any of the persons) solicited, or nuisance to other persons in the neighbourhood. A person also commits an offence if in a street or public place he persistently solicits another person, or different persons, for the purpose of prostitution.
A person guilty of either of these offence is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.
1 For these purposes, references to a person soliciting another person for the purpose of prostitution are references to his soliciting that person for the purpose of obtaining that person's services as a prostitute: Sexual Offences Act 1985 s 4(1) (amended by the Sexual Offences Act 2003 s 56, Sch 1 para 4(1), (5)(b)–(e)). As to the meanings of 'prostitute' and 'solicit' at common law see para 224 notes 1, 2 ante.
2 For the meaning of 'motor vehicle' see the Road Traffic Act 1988 s 185(1); and road traffic vol 40(1) (2007 Reissue) para 210 (definition applied by the Sexual Offences Act 1985 s 1(3) (amended by the Road Traffic (Consequential Provisions) Act 1988 s 4, Sch 3 para 29)).
3 For these purposes, 'street' includes any bridge, road, lane, footway, subway, square, court, alley or passage, whether a thoroughfare or not, which is for the time being open to the public; and the doorways and entrances of premises abutting on a street, and any ground adjoining and open to a street, are to be treated as forming part of the street: Sexual Offences Act 1985 s 4(4).
4 Ibid s 1(1)(a) (s 1(1) amended by the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Sch 1 para 4(1), (3)). As to the meaning of 'public place' see para 224 note 4 ante.
5 Sexual Offences Act 1985 s 1(1)(b) (as amended: see note 4 supra).
6 There must be a degree of repetition, either of invitations to one person or to different persons, but two invitations may be sufficient to support a charge: see Dale v Smith [1967] 2 All ER 1133, [1967] 1 WLR 700, DC (decided under the Sexual Offences Act 1956 s 32 (repealed)).
7 Sexual Offences Act 1985 s 1(1) (as amended: see note 4 supra). In convicting a person of "kerb-crawling" contrary to s 1 (as amended), justices are entitled to apply their local knowledge of the area where the offence occurred and conclude that his activities would have been likely to cause a nuisance to other persons in the neighbourhood even though there was no direct evidence that a nuisance had actually been caused to anyone: Paul v DPP (1989) 90 Cr App Rep 173, DC.
8 Sexual Offences Act 1985 s 2(1) (amended by the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Sch 1 para 4(1), (4)). There must be more than one act of soliciting in order to establish the element of persistence: Darroch v DPP (1990) 91 Cr App Rep 378, [1990] Crim LR 814, DC. To prove soliciting, the prosecution must prove that the defendant gave some indication, by act or words, to the prostitute, that he required the prostitute's services: Darroch v DPP supra (act of persistently driving a motor vehicle round an area frequented by prostitutes did not constitute an act of soliciting a woman for the purposes of prostitution; thus although there had been one act of soliciting, beckoning to a prostitute, there had not been persistent soliciting).
_________________________-