Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 5:31 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
As the high court has already made judgment on this case, regarding being licenced in one area and working in another, could the same apply in Scotland :?: :?: or are our laws different in this case


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
skippy41 wrote:
As the high court has already made judgment on this case, regarding being licenced in one area and working in another, could the same apply in Scotland :?: :?: or are our laws different in this case

Laws are different either side of the wall, but cases like the Gladen one can have an influence.

In fact from time to time you will see judgments from the likes of Canada and Australia mentioned in higher court appeals.

Don't think any have ever related to the taxi/PH trade though.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
skippy41 wrote:
As the high court has already made judgment on this case, regarding being licenced in one area and working in another, could the same apply in Scotland :?: :?: or are our laws different in this case


The CGSA 1982 doesn't allow this.

Offences

21(1) If any person -

(a) operates, or permits the operation of, a taxi within an area in respect of which its operation requires to be but is not licensed or the driver
requires to be but is not licensed; or
(b) picks up passengers in, or permits passengers to be picked up by, a
private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation requires
to be but is not licensed or the driver requires to be but is not licensed, that person shall be guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding £2,500.
(2) Subsection (1) above does not apply to the operation of a taxi or private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation or its driver is not licensed if the request for its hiring was received by its driver (otherwise than in a public place from the person to be conveyed in it, or a person acting on his behalf, for a journey beginning there and then) whilst -
(a) in the area or in that part thereof in respect of which its operation and
its driver are licensed;
(b) engaged on hire on a journey which began in that area or part or will
end there; or
(c) returning to that area or part immediately following completion of a
journey on hire.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
gusmac wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
As the high court has already made judgment on this case, regarding being licenced in one area and working in another, could the same apply in Scotland :?: :?: or are our laws different in this case


The CGSA 1982 doesn't allow this.

Offences

Quote:
21(1) If any person -

(a) operates, or permits the operation of, a taxi within an area in respect of which its operation requires to be but is not licensed or the driver
requires to be but is not licensed;


The way i read this is, if the cab or driver is NOT LICENCED, there is no reference to being licenced, and working in another area




or
(b) picks up passengers in, or permits passengers to be picked up by, a
private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation requires
to be but is not licensed or the driver requires to be but is not licensed, that person shall be guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding £2,500.
(2) Subsection (1) above does not apply to the operation of a taxi or private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation or its driver is not licensed if the request for its hiring was received by its driver (otherwise than in a public place from the person to be conveyed in it, or a person acting on his behalf, for a journey beginning there and then) whilst -
(a) in the area or in that part thereof in respect of which its operation and
its driver are licensed;
(b) engaged on hire on a journey which began in that area or part or will
end there; or
(c) returning to that area or part immediately following completion of a
journey on hire.


In fact I read the whole thing this way, if a driver or vehicle is licenced hack then they have the right to work as PH in any area, only PH have to return to there own area


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
I don't see how you figure that out :?

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
gusmac wrote:

Offences

21(1) If any person -

(a) operates, or permits the operation of, a taxi within an area in respect of which its operation requires to be but is not licensed or the driver
requires to be
but is not licensed; or
(b) picks up passengers in, or permits passengers to be picked up by, a
private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation requires
to be but is not licensed or the driver requires to be but is not licensed, that person shall be guilty of an offence and liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding £2,500.
(2) Subsection (1) above does not apply to the operation of a taxi or private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation or its driver is not licensed if the request for its hiring was received by its driver (otherwise than in a public place from the person to be conveyed in it, or a person acting on his behalf, for a journey beginning there and then) whilst -
(a) in the area or in that part thereof in respect of which its operation and
its driver are licensed;
(b) engaged on hire on a journey which began in that area or part or will
end there; or
(c) returning to that area or part immediately following completion of a
journey on hire.
You can't operate a taxi in an area you are not licenced for. That licence must be issued by the local authority for that area.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
gusmac wrote:
(2) Subsection (1) above does not apply to the operation of a taxi or private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation or its driver is not licensed if the request for its hiring was received by its driver (otherwise than in a public place from the person to be conveyed in it, or a person acting on his behalf, for a journey beginning there and then) whilst -
(a) in the area or in that part thereof in respect of which its operation and
its driver are licensed;
(b) engaged on hire on a journey which began in that area or part or will
end there; or
(c) returning to that area or part immediately following completion of a
journey on hire.
If you were right skippy, why would they have bothered to include taxis in subsection 2?

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
gusmac wrote:
I don't see how you figure that out :?


Right Gus, if I came up to Aberdeen, and as I am fully licenced as a hack, I could legaly work there as a PH through an office, not that I would want to with them high radio charges :lol: :lol:

Quote:
Quote:
21(1) If any person -

(a) operates, or permits the operation of, a taxi within an area in respect of which its operation requires it to be, but is not licensed or the driver
requires to be but is not licensed;


The way i read this is, if the cab or driver is NOT LICENCED, there is no reference to being licenced, and working in another area


Its this first part that allows me to do it, being fully licenced regardless of what area I paid my licence fee's in.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
gusmac wrote:
gusmac wrote:
(2) Subsection (1) above does not apply to the operation of a taxi or private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation or its driver is not licensed if the request for its hiring was received by its driver (otherwise than in a public place from the person to be conveyed in it, or a person acting on his behalf, for a journey beginning there and then) whilst -
(a) in the area or in that part thereof in respect of which its operation and
its driver are licensed;
(b) engaged on hire on a journey which began in that area or part or will
end there; or
(c) returning to that area or part immediately following completion of a
journey on hire.
If you were right skippy, why would they have bothered to include taxis in subsection 2?


That means if I am correct in my assessment, that if your driving along and someone waves you down you are not permitted to pick them up unless they have made a call to you or an office, in the same terms as what a PH operates


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
skippy41 wrote:
gusmac wrote:
I don't see how you figure that out :?


Right Gus, if I came up to Aberdeen, and as I am fully licenced as a hack, I could legaly work there as a PH through an office, not that I would want to with them high radio charges :lol: :lol:

Quote:
Quote:
21(1) If any person -

(a) operates, or permits the operation of, a taxi within an area in respect of which its operation requires it to be, but is not licensed or the driver
requires to be but is not licensed;


The way i read this is, if the cab or driver is NOT LICENCED, there is no reference to being licenced, and working in another area


Its this first part that allows me to do it, being fully licenced regardless of what area I paid my licence fee's in.
Yes you could skippy, so long as you don't mind returning to the scottish borders between hires :lol:

You are not a PH, you are an out of zone taxi.
Your hack licence is only valid in the licenced area which issued it.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
skippy41 wrote:
gusmac wrote:
gusmac wrote:
(2) Subsection (1) above does not apply to the operation of a taxi or private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation or its driver is not licensed if the request for its hiring was received by its driver (otherwise than in a public place from the person to be conveyed in it, or a person acting on his behalf, for a journey beginning there and then) whilst -
(a) in the area or in that part thereof in respect of which its operation and
its driver are licensed;
(b) engaged on hire on a journey which began in that area or part or will
end there; or
(c) returning to that area or part immediately following completion of a
journey on hire.
If you were right skippy, why would they have bothered to include taxis in subsection 2?


That means if I am correct in my assessment, that if your driving along and someone waves you down you are not permitted to pick them up unless they have made a call to you or an office, in the same terms as what a PH operates
Your assessment is wrong. You must comply with a,b or c above.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
gusmac wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
gusmac wrote:
gusmac wrote:
(2) Subsection (1) above does not apply to the operation of a taxi or private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation or its driver is not licensed if the request for its hiring was received by its driver (otherwise than in a public place from the person to be conveyed in it, or a person acting on his behalf, for a journey beginning there and then) whilst -
(a) in the area or in that part thereof in respect of which its operation and
its driver are licensed;
(b) engaged on hire on a journey which began in that area or part or will
end there; or
(c) returning to that area or part immediately following completion of a
journey on hire.
If you were right skippy, why would they have bothered to include taxis in subsection 2?


That means if I am correct in my assessment, that if your driving along and someone waves you down you are not permitted to pick them up unless they have made a call to you or an office, in the same terms as what a PH operates
Your assessment is wrong. You must comply with a,b or c above.


I dont think so Gus, as the wording NOT LICENCED is there, JD may be able to shed some more light on this, I just wish there was a Scottish solisitor on here that we could consult


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
skippy41 wrote:
gusmac wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
gusmac wrote:
gusmac wrote:
(2) Subsection (1) above does not apply to the operation of a taxi or private hire car within an area in respect of which its operation or its driver is not licensed if the request for its hiring was received by its driver (otherwise than in a public place from the person to be conveyed in it, or a person acting on his behalf, for a journey beginning there and then) whilst -
(a) in the area or in that part thereof in respect of which its operation and
its driver are licensed;
(b) engaged on hire on a journey which began in that area or part or will
end there; or
(c) returning to that area or part immediately following completion of a
journey on hire.
If you were right skippy, why would they have bothered to include taxis in subsection 2?


That means if I am correct in my assessment, that if your driving along and someone waves you down you are not permitted to pick them up unless they have made a call to you or an office, in the same terms as what a PH operates
Your assessment is wrong. You must comply with a,b or c above.


I dont think so Gus, as the wording NOT LICENCED is there, JD may be able to shed some more light on this, I just wish there was a Scottish solisitor on here that we could consult
The section above applies to out of area taxis (in your case outwith the Scottish Borders boundary) and any PH anywhere. This states the conditions under which you can accept a hire. This section does not apply to a licenced hack in it's own area.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
the act says:" within an area in respect of which its operation requires it to be, but is not licensed.

A taxi has to have a licence from somewhere to be a taxi in the first place.
With no licence at all it is not a taxi.

You are not licenced for the Aberdeen area, but you are a taxi.

Subsection 2 tells you under which curcumstances you can legally accept a hire in Aberdeen or anywhere else in Scotland, apart from your own area.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gladen court case
PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
skippy41 wrote:
As the high court has already made judgment on this case, regarding being licenced in one area and working in another, could the same apply in Scotland :?: :?: or are our laws different in this case


Errm am I being thick but the judge in Gladen didnt say that did he?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 230 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group