Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 6:46 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: rickshaws York
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:31 pm
Posts: 1409
Location: Grim North, Carrot Crunchers and Codhead Country, North of Watford Gap
now they are going to be hackney i suppose they can then come on the ranks as well
http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/yorknew ... lution.php


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: rickshaws York
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
Stinky Pete wrote:
now they are going to be hackney i suppose they can then come on the ranks as well
http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/yorknew ... lution.php

Not the issue at hand, but is this bit now a given? :?

The issue is being considered now after members decided to remove a previous restriction on the number of hackney carriage licences at their November meeting, subject to review.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
I'll have to check it out but isn't there still an appeal currently outstanding in London over this Rickshaw hackney carriage issue?

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
JD wrote:
I'll have to check it out but isn't there still an appeal currently outstanding in London over this Rickshaw hackney carriage issue?

TfL have been given permission for a Judicial Appeal, but if I remember rightly London's act slightly differs from us in relation to these things. :?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
How the hell do you need a drivers licence for a bike :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
skippy41 wrote:
How the hell do you need a drivers licence for a bike :?:

Same as you do for a horse and cart, and one of those boat things in Cambridge. :shock:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Sussex wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
How the hell do you need a drivers licence for a bike :?:

Same as you do for a horse and cart, and one of those boat things in Cambridge. :shock:


A CAR LICENCE FOR THEM AS WELL :shock: :shock: :shock:

Mind you it is a little confusing having the word DRIVERS LICENCE when they should have said a cycling proficiency test


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Sussex wrote:
JD wrote:
I'll have to check it out but isn't there still an appeal currently outstanding in London over this Rickshaw hackney carriage issue?

TfL have been given permission for a Judicial Appeal, but if I remember rightly London's act slightly differs from us in relation to these things. :?


I was reading this case two or three weeks ago because I intended to refer to it in another thread but as per usual time passed me by.

TFL were granted a judicial review on 24 January 2007 and bug bugs appealed that decision. The appeal was dismissed but the comments of the judge are most significant.

The appeal was heard on 25 October 2007 and struck out.

Bugbugs had sought to strike out the decision, on the grounds of abuse of process of a claim made under CPR Part 8 by Transport for London for a declaration that a pedicab is a "hackney carriage" for the purposes of section 4 of the Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869 ("the 1869 Act").

York would be well advised to wait on this decision before they license any pedicabs.

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
The case I referred to can be found on bailii.org.

Anyone interested in the outcome of whether a pedicab is a hackney carriage or not should pay particular attention to the the references to paragraph 16 schedule 1 of the 1985 act and in particular to the opening words of that paragraph and to the case of Beg.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2007/2987.html

Regards

JD

_________________
Copyright notice © The contents of this post are copyright of JD and are not to be reproduced outside of TDO without written permission.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 433 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group