GA wrote:
Manchester Council have drafted a set of proposals to allow those firms effected by the repeal of S75(b) to become licensed with certain "concessions".
This is the covering letter, the whole document is about 9 pages long.
[i]Dear Sir,
Consultation - Licensinq of Non-Standard Private Hire Vehicles
The Road Traffic Safety Act 2006, Section 53, repealed part of the Section 75 of the Local Government( Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976, which exempted certain categories of drivers and vehicles from the need to be licensed, if they conducted their business by having hire contracts of not less than 7 days.
**As you are aware this change in legislation has resulted in the need for all vehicles, up to a maximum of 8 passengers, used for non-standard private hire, to be licensed**.
I think people should realise that limos and the like are not standard private hire vehicles and this is how licensing authorities categorise them. Not many people think they are standard private hire vehicles but those that do should take a step a back and consider the obvious.
Quote:
There are a wide range of vehicles, drivers and operators who now need to be licensed.
Manchester city council has never prosecuted any so called executive car or 8 seater limo all the time these vehicles have operated illegally on contracts that didn't last for 7 days or more. The chances of them improving on that dismal record now that section 75 1b has gone, is remote.
Quote:
As a general guide this includes vehicles used for executive hire, chauffeur services, park and ride for private car parks, airport travel and vehicles used to transport employees to work.
If I was an operator who supplied one of these services I wouldn't be overly concerned about Manchester's involvement in licensing because their track record proves that they aren't going to police any of those illegal activities mentioned above.
Quote:
Manchester City Council accepts that, whilst these vehicles have to be licensed, it may not be necessary for them to comply with all aspects of the standard private hire vehicle policy and conditions.
I suppose that means the same policy and conditions that Manchester city council allowed private operators and drivers to illegally ply for hire at an illegal taxi rank at the "print works".
Quote:
The Council proposes that all applications for non-standard private hire are accompanied by a detailed business plan. The business plan will be required to contain sufficient detail to enable the Council to consider both the nature of the business as well as the type of vehicle being used.
Asking for this information is quite within their rights.
Quote:
At a meeting of the Council's Licensing & Appeals Committee on 17 March 2008, members agreed that the draft policy outlining the criteria, which will be used to determine whether a vehicle is a non standard private hire , together with a set of draft non-standard private hire vehicle conditions, should be subject to a 6 week consultation period with affected businesses.
Again take note of the word non standard because limos cannot be classed as standard private hire vehicles because they don't operate in the same way.
Quote:
To ensure compatibility in light of the change in legislation the Council are also reviewing the current policy and licence conditions in respect of private hire drivers and operators.
But I bet these limos don't have to be all the same colour as private hire vehicles do or even have to conform to the conditions of right hand drive? Perhaps private hire owners now have a case for getting rid of the standard vehicle colour and using left hand drive vehicles?
If its not unreasonable to license limos with left hand drive then the same should apply to normal private hire vehicles.
Quote:
I would therefore be grateful if you could take a few minutes to read the enclosed draft policy and conditions.
That's asking too much of Manchester councillors because even if they did read it they wouldn't understand it.
Regards
JD