Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 1:26 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
Dare I say it, no I'll give you a clue people who meet in lodges and wear aprons and have funny handshakes.


Swedes?

hehe

Captain cab

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
Dare I say it, no I'll give you a clue people who meet in lodges and wear aprons and have funny handshakes.


Swedes?

hehe

Captain cab

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Derestriction list
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:56 am 
JD wrote:
deecee wrote:
A couple of errors in the list Crawley was already in the consultation process well before theOFT report.Knowsley hasn't changed its policy since the oft report.


I suspect you read one of the earlier lists, which put Knowsley in the wrong section. If you had read any of the updated lists you would have noticed that Knowsley had been amended.

With respect to Crawley I haven't got a clue what you are talking about. The list categorically states that the changes represent those Authorities that have changed their policy since before or after the publication of the OFT report and that of the recent November 2004 DFT amended report.

I take it you fail to understand what "before or after" means?

Best wishes

JD



very curt, I dont suffer fools gladly answer!

bet you dont get an oscar! lol


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
East Riding are lifting numbers control from the first of April. New policy Qaulity control.

Burnley are keeping a restrricted policy likewise Congleton who have a special policy which also allows 16 wav vehicles. So far only three have been taken up so if anyone wants to go and work in Congleton they can providing you supply a WAV.

Best wishes

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Taxi Consultation
11:24 Wednesday 12 January 2005


Are you happy with the taxi services in Newbury and West Berkshire? West Berkshire Council, the authority that licenses local taxi firms, is seeking the views of local people regarding local taxi services. Brian Leahy, the Council's Senior Licensing Officer, said: "It's six years since the last review and times and needs change."

The Council suggests a number of questions that people might have opinions on: "Are there enough taxis? Are they the right type of vehicle? Are they readily available at the right times? Are they easy to identify? Are they easy for all to use, for example, those with restricted mobility, the elderly, the infirm, or those with a disability?"

You are invited to address your views to Brian Leahy, Senior Licensing Officer at West Berkshire Council:

Email: bleahy@westberks.gov.uk
Post: Council Offices, Market Street, Newbury RG14 5LD
Phone: 01635 519494
A leaflet has been produced, to assist this public consultation exercise, entitled 'Be Safe - a taxi information leaflet'. Copies can be obtained from West Berkshire Council and have also been distributed to local libraries.

In order to be taken into account, any comments or views have to be sumbitted to the council before 31st January 2005.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
captain cab wrote:
Taxi Consultation

The Council suggests a number of questions that people might have opinions on: "Are there enough taxis? Are they the right type of vehicle? Are they readily available at the right times? Are they easy to identify? Are they easy for all to use, for example, those with restricted mobility, the elderly, the infirm, or those with a disability?"


I believe the reason why West Berks are conducting this excercise is because they only have two wav's out of 216 vehicles. Expect to see some movement on that score next year, such as the council no longer licensing Saloon type vehicles.

If you live in West Berks and don't want to pay in excess of 20 grand for a wav vehicle I would get rid of your old car if you have one and replace it with something better, because next year you might find that when you get rid of your old vehicle it will have to be replaced with a WAV.

If they find there are not enough taxis there isn't a lot West Berks can do because they don't limit numbers, maybe they are going to subsidise taxi drivers.

Best wishes

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
Funny bearing in mind they de-limited about 6/7 years ago. The local trade even employed a certain Mr Maddox (Kearns's usual barrister), but the council did it right, thus the council won.

Maybe this has more to do with making HCs WAVs than anything else.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Sussex wrote:
Maybe this has more to do with making HCs WAVs than anything else.


It would seem that way. They have to address the current trend in wheelchair provision sooner or later. I suspect the disabled lobby has been on to them and said hey! you only have two WAV's in west Berkshire, we want 202 wav's lol

Best wishes

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Restricted Quota list
PostPosted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:12 pm
Posts: 4
Location: Wirral
Just a few corrections; Crawley took the decision to delimit before the OFT report, as did Castle Point which was even earlier 92000-2001?) Knowsley are going to survey


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57334
Location: 1066 Country
deecee wrote:
Just a few corrections; Crawley took the decision to delimit before the OFT report, as did Castle Point which was even earlier 92000-2001?) Knowsley are going to survey

I think the original list of restricting councils was taken from the DfT letter to councils, and both Crawley and Castlepoint were on it.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Sussex wrote:
deecee wrote:
Just a few corrections; Crawley took the decision to delimit before the OFT report, as did Castle Point which was even earlier 92000-2001?) Knowsley are going to survey

I think the original list of restricting councils was taken from the DfT letter to councils, and both Crawley and Castlepoint were on it.


Doesn't make any diference, it was clearly stated in the list from 3rd December 2004 onwards that the changes in policy were "since" "before" or "after" the OFT report, so unless he read either of the earlier reports of 31 November or 2nd Dec he should have been aware of what it said.

Best wishes

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Alex wrote:
Well done to JD and TDO for sorting out all these numbers. =D>

I'm thinking of running a book on the number of councils that will still restrict this time next year. :shock:

85-90 Evens
90-100 2-1
100-110 100-30
110+ 10-1
75-80 2-1
0-75 5-1

Any offers?

Alex


Can I have a grand at 2/1 90 - 100 please?

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 11:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 6:09 pm
Posts: 1180
Location: Miles away from paradise, not far from hell.
JD wrote:
Can I have a grand at 2/1 90 - 100 please?

Providing someone has two grand at 85 to 90, then yes. :wink:

Alex

_________________
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ

Simply the best taxi forum in the whole wide world. www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2005 4:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Alex wrote:
JD wrote:
Can I have a grand at 2/1 90 - 100 please?

Providing someone has two grand at 85 to 90, then yes. :wink:

Alex


You would be a grand light if 85 - 90 came in. lol Maybe you should balance the book and offer even money each of two. I definately think 90 - 100 should be favourite. Perhaps you are being overley optimistic at 80 - 90.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Yesterday Eastleigh lifted numbers control in favour of Quality control effective from 1/7/05. This now leaves 60 councils or 17.5% who have yet to decide on policy. 49 councils or 14.2% have already decided to retain numbers control.

Regards

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 822 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group