Stationtone wrote:
gusmac wrote:
http://committees.aberdeencity.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=149&MId=1935&Ver=4[/quote
Gusmac you must be very pleased about this ,professor cooper from Napier university is a good man , same professor that gave evidence in the Perth survey

Dusty bin watch this space

I've spoken to Professor Cooper, and I am sure he would be the first to tell you that surveys are only as accurate as the questions asked and the methodology followed to acquire the data. At best surveys used to monitor demand are a snap shot in time, which is out of date almost as quick as the ink dries. The cost of a survey also has a huge impact on how in-depth a survey can be. Spending a bit more cash could give you a different set of results altogether, it's about factoring in all the variables in an attempt to achieve accurate data.
Take rank surveys, for instance, has anyone figured in mobile phone usage and how this impacts on people waiting at ranks? And what about the expansion of Ph, perhaps this is a demand indicator, which is never looked at? How many people got sick of waiting in rank and started phoning Ph, because they couldn't get a taxi?
The truth is, bringing in consultants like Jacobs or Halcrow is all about justifying a decision, they, for the most part, have already made.
Whether or not you are for or against a restriction is largely irrelevant. The council doesn't care because you don't really matter.
Stationtone, Fairplay, Doom if you believe otherwise, more fool you, you are gullible to the extreme.
